Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "Biden campaign gets 'massive boost' from South Carolina primary | DW News" video.

  1. 100,000 less votes than 2020, a poor showing for an incumbent.
    3
  2.  @LukVik  The women, not the men, which he gained in 2020
    2
  3. Biden got 100,000 less votes than 2020 in South Carolina. That tells you how unexcited they are in SC for Biden. Shame on DW.
    1
  4. Biden got 100,000 less votes than 2020, a poor showing for an incumbent.
    1
  5.  @dennischiu272  Yes, agreed, so why does that same logic not apply to Trump in Iowa caucus? News media reports great success for Biden even with low turnout, but report Iowa as low turnout being poor support for Trump. This is the post-modern, post-truth double standard, or dialectic inversion of the Woke Left. Oxford English Dictionary (OED) woke, adj.² sometimes derogatory, esp. as a means of characterizing such alertness (or the political and social views stereotypically associated with it) as doctrinaire, self-righteous, or pernicious.
    1
  6. Biden got 100,000 less votes than 2020.
    1
  7. Biden got 100,000 less votes than in 2020 when he ran against Bernie, a poor showing for an incumbent.
    1
  8.  @dennischiu272  Biden got 100,000 less votes than 2020.
    1
  9. Biden got 100,000 less votes than 2020.
    1
  10. DW is quite ignorant of the history of South Carolina and Joe Biden's win there in 2020 when Congressman Clyburn ordered the vote. 2024 Biden only got 126,000 votes, 100,000 less than 2020 when Clyburn burned Bernie Sanders chances.
    1