Comments by "nuqwestr" (@nuqwestr) on "" video.

  1. From John Yoo's Claremont Amicus Brief: “This principle,” Chief Justice Chase affirmed, “forbids a construction of the amendment, not clearly required by its terms, which will bring it into conflict or disaccord with the other provisions of the constitution.” Id. Trump did not receive "Due Process" in Colorado, which was stated in the dissent by Colorado Chief Justice Boatright. The Colorado decision created discord with the Constitution and did not harmonize with the intent of Section 3.
    3
  2. Yoo's Amicus Brief makes a compelling argument that a private litigant, like Norma Anderson, has no legal standing to use Section 3, and cites the Griffin decision "almost" precedent. John, loved reading about Chase and the Giffin case. I wonder if I could disqualify any judge using Section 3? Perhaps Trump should claim it against Jack Smith?
    1
  3. Yes, every bootlegger in the 1920s "“engaged” in “insurrection” “against the Constitution,”
    1