Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "Why Europe is Reinstating Conscription" video.

They showed the graph the way it iseant to be represented to show relative changes within a given time frame.. Often you have many grapes that are far away from 0 and representing them with the 0 shown maked the graph useless because you want to see change between 1000-1200 and you can barely see it due to the wasted zoom-out to show 0-1200
15
@coffeecat8826 Learn how mathematics works. Y should absolutely NOT always be zero
14
The answer to your question is so complex that it would take 2 hours video examining the causes and possible effects and it would turn more into a documentary than a news report.
7
I was never against the concept of Conscription. I am usually against specific parts of Conscriptions. 1. Gender equality, women should be included. They don't have to necessarily have the same training, heck they could have an option which kind they want to do. But they should have a form of it too. 2. I myself am a migrant (EU to other European country) and actively lived in my settled country since 12 (2/3 of the time in one, 1/3 in the other) and since 18 I spend almost all the time in my settled country. For people like me, retrospective Conscription is not possible. Often it comes with a huge fine, or with a demand to return for a year... Quitting your job and leaving your family. I do not see any sense in such law for those actively working, residing and having a family abroad. You may argue - you have the citizenship hence you must. But you cannot legally get rid of your only citizenship and it costs couple of thousands to get the citizenship of the host country... So you are kind of stuck. 3. The training has to be useful for both Wartime and non wartime times. Survival training is good, fighting is good but medical knowledge stays, emergency situation training stays, teamwork and cooperation stays. You are taking young people out of the national economy for a year/two. They deserve to be trained in such a way that it would benefit the wider population and economy even after their training, even if no war happens.
5
Probably because they either have the idea that conscription mean being deployed abroad in a foreign war such as ... Much of the west. Or they have an idea that conscription results in 2 years of wasted time with bullying, no income and no actual training like in the old socialist east.
1
@pite9 😂 Barely anything they show can be considered Propaganda, that are very centrist and purely report without hinting or pushing either narrative. That grap should not be shown from 0 because the 0 is irrelevant to the changes. Don't blame the Chanel for your lack of basic education
1
@damnedmadman Women should be trained in conscription in regards to how to protect themselves, be it from weapons or rape, they should be taught how to protect children - not because they are Mother's per say but simply because women are most commonly teachers and nurses in workplaces. They should be taught how to seek out help, how not to get panicked and what to do in an emergency because they should not be left in the Blank if a war or a disaster happens. They deserve to have training towards survival, fighting and safety just as any man. Yes ,the active battlefield oriented training could be lessened but should be at the very least optional as many women don't appreciate being pushed to the sidelines and are willing to fight to their homelands just as any man. Besides, modern war is a modern war. There is no physical advantage between men and women when it comes to flying drones or making them...
1
@damnedmadman To put it in your boldly to someone with a sexist and blind view of the reality. Strong women make strong mothers. Strong mothers raise strong children... Strong children include stronger men of the future. But you are too blind to think of women as anything else than a birth machine rather than consider them both as individuals, part of the society and members of the nations.
1