Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "KaiserBauch" channel.

  1. It's saddening that he makes an objective video but the comments are absolutely ideological. People here seem to see Brasils crime and economics as a result of their racial mixing. That's toxic and Americanism. Brasils success has little to do with it's modern racial structures. This is even more evident as Brasil was better off without American categorisation which always causes spikes in racism. Eg they see Kamala Harris as Black, where as many Europeans would barely see her as Brown and would even call her white in many cases (akin to Spaniards or Italians).
    230
  2. ​ @georgios_5342  that's bit weird. When I was younger I would often see pregnant women even in ther Kate months outside. They went for walks (as one put it... It is a small walk and more sitting outside). I would see them in town centers holding their belly and reading news or magazines, I would see them in parks where they would somethimes just watch kids of various ages interact... Or just be in nature.
    66
  3. ​ @diogo7905  the thing is easily explainable. With the use of policies of Workers. USSR had many towns and cities where they shipped Russians and some other Rus people's such as Belarusians and Ukrainians. These were towns orientated around specific labours. Most skilled labourers were russian. Hence Russian ethnicity was spread under the Workers sentiments. Additionally, Russian was the go to language, hence why the Russification meant that general institution demanded the use of Russian to get anything done. Hence eroding natives in the east and Russifing the Asiatic Russia. Essentially. Yes all ethnic labels were taken down in pursuit of a new Soviet label. However the Soviet label was predominantly and very heavily taken out of Russian cultural context as it was led through Russian ethic majority. Thus it was more of a rebranding of Russian Cultural identity and making it easier to sell to other ethic groups... Because "it does not enforce Russian.. it's a new one, made for us all- just basically made out of Russian"
    37
  4. Thanks for the useless comment which summarises the Author of this Video's point of view and conclusion...
    36
  5. ​ @ZAMAKOVO  yeah. Besides certain parts of actual way of thinking I do think one is from Eastern Europe, the other is American. So I often saw them more reasonable for American oriented content, but then saw so many .. dno what to call it... From wrong stuff to just either ignoring or having no clue about the underlying cultural contexts
    28
  6. "capabilities" based on race is a gross myth. Capabilities is something gained by education...
    26
  7. I know yoh are more on the demographics side but it would be interesting if you could look into the Duch multipilar cultural society compared to others. Essentially. Their policy was that the state had to fund migrant cultural aspects of life and not just the duch ones. They had to built or fund masques or other worship places. Fund the education in mofrant languages.. ex ex. Essentially... Did everything which orevents assimilation into the local culture... And funded it by the state.
    23
  8. ​ @TearThatRedFlagDown  "our" makes no sense here. No one knows where you are...
    23
  9. ​ @OGrandomunknownperson  people relate to their home countries even in a single-race society.... It's very common you know. Pole, Slovak, Czech, German or French living in the UK always refer to their home countries and compare things even after 30 years of residency.
    20
  10. How would you describe them over all. You said they are pro Ukraine but what about other opponions. LGBT, other alliances, economic outlook (desire to have more trade elsewhere) or language policies? I as as I myself send to describe myself as Progressive Traditionalist (eh I am pro choice, I am accepting of Gays (I am one heh) even though I myself have no clear option the deeper LGBT stuff (general don't care much but observe it). I personally want traditions to be around, even religion in many forms, thought I believe many need to adapt to suit modern values.
    20
  11. I would not say it was Germany per say. The Slavs that were assimilated were... Slavs. All slavs have a tendency to quickly adapt the others culture and assimilate within one generation especially with incentives.
    19
  12. That's because the English countryside is usually the more Posh and middle class living where as the Urban areas are more crowded and less traditional (I mean evolved traditional - eg no one has issues with gays as they are no different in their lifestyle than any other people, but anyone with a family simply prefers to live outside of urban areas)
    18
  13. For the demographics of Poland. How much do you reckon will immigrantion into Poland better Poland. I mean east European immigrants. As due to the well prevention of Poland and it's similarities to the rest of counties might make people assimilate and take on Polish culture more than any other immigration
    17
  14. It's not fear mothering. He isn't stating it as some conspiracy. He states it as the Facts and Data state it. 1. Religious groups tend to have higher birth rate and retention of culture. This in Atheistic Europe with low birth rate, and hight immigration with high Religiosity (and birth rate) will over time cause a demographic ethnic change. Eh. Britain went from 94% British to 74% in leads than 30 years. This has nothing to do with race tho, as stated, it's about culture, ideas, ideology and understanding of the society of the country where large influence of people from non democracies and from regions with vastly different value systems will inevitably affect the democraticy of the country they move into. Descendants of migrants don't tend to harbour any form of patriotism be it showed in Democratic care, general care fro the area nor if it came to the defence of the country in case of an attack. Hence even stated in the vide that even Emigration from Ukraine into Poland is not a good thing long term wise (talking decades). These are long term goals which are needed in Europe to have a functioning democracies which is someone Americans rarely understand. You often connect these demographic things with Nazis and their Nationalism... Meanwhile forgoing the fact that it was Nationalism, The threat of Outside and the continuation Ethic and linguistic erosion of the region which made the brand of Eastern Nationasim... Which developed and established Nation States. Meanwhile akin ideas when put onto Imperial powers such as Germany, Britain or even the Ottomans harbour danger where they connect it to their Imperialism Glory and this it just another extension of such Imperial Glory.
    15
  15. Sure. Keep believing that gay rights have any effect on fertility rate ... (They don't). Gay right are not even controversial in the UK and are accepted by all parties left and right. It works, it doesn't have to be discussed. And traditions evolve.. hence why Anglican church accepts gay marriage and openly gay priests. The only topic that's questioned is Trans, which itself has almost nothing to do with gays.
    15
  16. ​@Wendeta-hq2cp MEGA is not even a thing...
    14
  17. The difference goes as far as the 6th century. As stated. It's the Germania-Slavica. East Germany was largely composed of Slavic peoples who were replaced or heavily incorporated into the "German" nation (quotations as it was not unified Germany as we know). The Polabian Slavs such as Sorbs are still around but they were assimilated (by force and without a force) into German language, culture and politics. But the divide is still there. And historic echoes tend to reinforce it - Catholics Vs protestants. Prussia Vs the rest. Iron curtain.
    13
  18. ​ @kaiserbauch9092  from what I keep hearing it's akin to the the other great empires. France gets migration from countries that were in its empire, Portugal gets it from Brazil, UK from Africa and India. I would say it's mainly linguistics.
    13
  19.  @GrosPointRouge  Actually... My comment at least informs you that you managed to summarise this view. Without it copying the video nor trying to create some sort of moral point which was talked about anyway. The topic even being concentrated around the problems of Mass Migration rather than pure migration as it talks about rate of migration and rate of assimilation, with an underlying contextual differences affecting these rates. The legalism or illegalism of migration becomes increasingly null with the rate being so high... As measures are need to limit even legal migration (thus by default affecting illegal migration).
    12
  20. The Hungarian attitude is the Slavic attitude when it comes to it. It's common this way in Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia and Ukraine. The Baltics are like it too. Tbh, apparently this has been somewhat of an old cultural trend where Slavic and protoslavic cultures were in the middle of the plains and thus mixed a lot. Being similar with your neighbours but different also naturally leads to this attitude. Even Russia has it... Be it mixed with an imperial tradition (meaning that they force it on conquered lands, whereas the latter Slavic nations didn't expand much)
    12
  21. Well. It even ironic what you read about Slavic history and Christianisation. Slavs were a decentralised tribal democracy akin to the native Americans and resided in Europe for 1000/1500 years before 5/6th century CE. Rome kept the region around as they were peaceful and non problematic, meanwhile they fought the Germanic and Celtic peoples more west. Rome fell. The Franko-Germanic states be it East Frankis empire or Later HRE then expend east around 5/6th century. Sonia, Byzantium also went north... And the Horde came from the east. It's said that Slavs centralised due to external threat where the clans were unified under a leading clan in order to defend from external attacks. Centralisation of Slavs mirrors the periods of attacks a lot. Especially that of Poland which united a fair amount of Slavic Tribes.
    12
  22. ​ @artilleryman895  it also showed the special phenomenon of Hungary. It was an oppressed nation but also the oppressor. Hence you can see their reaction as both where they still go towards claims of other nations but also act as one of the victims. Mixed mentality
    12
  23. 😂 You speak of Population Numbers... Not population make up. Russian empire indeed had less people.... But the people were younger and had more kids. Today's Russia has the largest population it ever had, and the smallest area it had ... But it's population is old. The average Russian is 40.3 years old. The Russian state runs one of the most hefty pension systems (which depends on constant population growth). Which is why Russia is heading for collapse, because it's ratio of yound to old is too great, because it does not have the technological ability to mitigate these effects and because it is a multinational federation where... Once it's core starts to fall, it's not hard to see the others trying to flee a sinking ship
    11
  24. ​ @kittytrail  Sad to break it to you but this whole Chanel is dedicated to... A Social Science.
    11
  25. Nowadays? It's an old term and they have a lot in common. It a simple termand from the 1800s which first meant Jews that converted to Christianity. Later it became a term for the unified life of Jews and Christians in middle of the 1900s. Meaning that Jews and Christians can coexist. Nowadays it just splits Islam from the Abrahamic religions and means that it Christian and Judean ideal. It's less about religious boundaries and more about cultural influence stemming out of the religions.
    11
  26. ​ @NightinGal89  And this is why the men that actually have a female partner and have a great relationship and understanding with them are the ones with more kids in a modern society. Literally every single woman of such man seems to want kids. My partner's sister wants kids and she is 24 about to get married, our friend is due soon at 25/26 and want more kids. The understanding solves the social issue. The only issues left are the economic and environmental. Heck. Even I as a gay man want kids and I used to want to have loads of kids (7) though unaffordable. We already had plenty of women tell us they would "carry for us". Which felt weird.
    11
  27. European and Homogenous is not comparable when you talk about... Europe. That's like calling East Asia fully Homogenous... Or the whole of Africa. I get that what you mean may differ, but you are grossly misusing the term.
    10
  28. That image is nowhere near the time stamp and the quote... It's at 1:04 and the quote is "in which oligarchy may replace democracy" As that's what happened in ancient Greece.
    10
  29.  @DungeonMarshal  I mean they have a small population but far more productive population than Russia. They have higher birth rate than Russia and a lower demographic decline than Russia. Russia runs on pensions and pensioners.. it's bound to collapse
    10
  30. ​ @pjotrnygard1447 russian white fertility rate is bellow 1.5. there is a fair amount of European countries that have higher fertility rate than that, and most of them are 95% white...
    9
  31. Jordan was part of the mandate of Palestine.... Jordan essentially was the Arab part of Palestine.... Hence why they have so many Palestinians
    8
  32. As stated here. Until 2001 the birth rate was higher in SVK. Then similar. After that, Slovak birth rate went down. Reason is rather simple - Slovakia is worse off hence far more of the younger and able migrate abroad - and mainly migrate into Czechia. That's since 2004. 20 years later - a one Generational circle in Theory, Slovak birth rate is smaller because the Population within Reproductive Age migrated out. Whilst this would likely boost Czech birth rates by the same amount that Slovakia lost it's (more or less). Which seems to align.
    8
  33. Here where I a gay man told people that I want kids.. they ask why and I say: 1. So that I am not alone in old age, 2. So that someone can take care of me when I am old,3. So that I am a part of some innate community (wider family often is). They said that's stupid and even evil. Then proceeded to school me regarding why you should have kids... Stating thing like affording to be able to go with them on Holliday's and so on as necessary. It just seemed weird to me, and from those points on clear to me, that it's not even tied to being liberal or being LGBT or being a man or a woman... None of that matters as each and every group went on about money, then reflecting on their own struggles where their own parents were no enough- mostly financially... To me that's weird. I am a Slovak and I grew up in largely very traditional family full of many catholics and military personnel (yet, neither care much wther I am gay or not- rare but they don't.. ). And even though I am a gay man, through their traditional mindsets (mixed with progressive views), even I still want kids and a family l, and aim in life "to be old grandpa that farms, gardens, helps with grandkids and all"... As I honestly don't see point in living and life without that goal. I might get excited at the thought of travels, especially as I love vernacular architecture, folklore and love learning and exploring these cultural parts from around the world... But even then my mind wonders to "but what then when I am old?". Even my damn catholic grandparents push towards me having kids, if possible (mind you), and they don't care if it's biological or adopted.
    8
  34. ​ @vh5663 Ethnically Czechs are not that related to Austrians... That a given fact. Also, just because someone promotes cultural kingship doesn't mean they are immediately some sort of Pan-slavist in the 20th century sense of the word.... It's as if you ignored all the videos on this channel because you can't understand the pattern on them... Cultural kingship is the entire point of these videos... Hence the mentions of assimilation, cooperation and coordination. Hence the mentions of migrants that are non problematic and problematic..... The more akin, the more friendly, the more it works....
    8
  35. Central yes but Czech east is also nominally poorer than the west (Bohemia Vs Moravia). But Czechia also has sudets which became desolated after expulsions.
    8
  36. Not surprised. The dialectal continuum was almost perfect prior to 1800s. After 1850s it split between Czech and Slovak a LOT due to the standardisation. Hence Moravian declined and standardised Czech (based more in Bohemian Czech) rose up. Meanwhile Slovak, based more on Central and western dialects rose in slovakia, and the regional dialects declined. Even today, a lot of Slovaks from center to west struggle to understand Eastern Slovaks but have no problem with Czech language or even the most Western Czech dialects.
    7
  37. ​​ @poonczey That's your personal perspective. Not a fact for everyone individually. My grandparents loved Czechoslovakia and unity with Czechs... My great grandparents also supported Czechslovakia. Heck my great grandfather who was a Slovak partisan during the war also supported the union... Equally my father also supports the union despite being within Slovak armed forces. They are all from different parts of my family and all are from North of Slovakia. Quite frankly even within Slovakia I could always notice a pattern where the more south and east you go the less Czech loving they got, but the north and north west remained very favourable towards the Czechs.
    7
  38. I like to view US as a post colonial renounce. Similar to many demographic changes throughout the colonial and precolonial eras. Eg. Frank's invading the area of France and mixing up. Or Latins (Portuguese and Spanish) colonising and intermixing in doubt America.
    7
  39. ​ @ep5019 Libia is also over 90% uninhabitable .....
    7
  40. Your comment seems to grossly misunderstand what a traditional United ethnicity means in Europe. As stated. A kid with parent that is Polish and German is mixed. A kid that is Mixed (like the above) and is married into another one that is seen as German is seen as German with Mixed heritage. A kid that is German of mixed heritage and married a German (even of mixed heritage) is German. Hence why Ethnicity is not purely genetics, it's very much an Ethno-Cultural concept. Secondly, an ethnic group can change within itself. Eg how Latins changed to Romans. That's through a natural Ethno-Cultural development. So you cannot state that they are mix of Romans, Saxons, Bavarians and so on... When the German ethnicity is based as an evolved concept from the ones that were listed.
    7
  41. ​​ @johnwotek3816 As much as I hate to admit it they are right. Human rights are rights that humans give to one another on the basis of belief and agreement that they are. The reality of Rights is that a true right is only as much as you are capable of doing yourself as an individual, where no one else guarantees you anything. Eg. If you are in a jungle, shouting that you have the right to clean water won't help you. A Tyger won't stop itself from eating you because you have the right to life... Human rights is a power structure which exists purely because other humans believe it does. But the fact is that even then they are not obliged to confirm to them - less so if they are certain that those they provide them to would not provide them to them or others. (Which is often the case with a lot of Muslim countries). The concept of Human rights essentially evolved from the late Christian churches, both protestants and Catholics. Eg. A basic form was the right to liturgy in native language and not Old Church Slavonic or Latin. This developed into the rights of ethnic groups to their own languages and even to the idea of sovereign individual nations, and to minorities using their minority languages. It is a social construct. A fairly good one. No one is stupid enough to dispute that certain common "laws" even between enemies are good for both. But are man made non the less. Just look at Fantasy writing of GRRM for example - guest rights are a man made rights but most comply with it because they believe them to be right and. Good for both sides. Those who do not are disposed by all sides equally.
    7
  42. What I noticed the most is that as someone who grew up in truly traditional Slavic family (that being within the Rod- clan, not just man and woman... That's not Slavic tradition). I grew up with my grandparents in one house, whilst seeing and visiting my other grandparents every week atkeast once. I have also frequently met siblings of my grandparents several times a months... And even am familiar with my grandmother's aunt. I have always been friendly with elderly and they were good with me. But when I moved to the UK, people do not have that experience. A lot of them do not even know their grandparents... Let alone siblings of their grandparents or their aunts... The animosity towards elderly and generally looking down on them is something I cannot unnotice. But at the same time I do see many elderly here just straight shit on the young too. It's weird but it's also what I see in Slovakia... Usually with those whom were from small families.
    7
  43. You have an obvious fallacy in your statement. "Wouldn't all the rich countries have higher fertility?" Well no. Housing is more expensive. Housing in poor countries isn't and is generally larger even if worse quality. If you want to own a house in the UK you need to have some 11/13 times the average yearly salary. This has literally been covered in this video and previous ones on this channel.
    7
  44. ​ @matpk British Overseas Citizen - a citizen of British overseas territories, e.g. Falkland Islands. British Citizen overseas - Is a British citizen that traveled abroad.
    6
  45. ​ @purpledurple621  like I said... That's the very Anglo-sphere point of views which in fact does not reflect the majority of the word. Once again you mixed what ethnic and race is. You made ethnics a race issue which it isn't. Ethnicity is not a race, norna sub race, it a mix of cultural, linguistic and sup-racial. Which is also why emigration form closely allied and akin places works more and also has a lot more assimilation which results into the people becoming nominally ethic and their descendants becoming part of the Ethnicity over all. You point something that was racial and centered around places which actually had slavery and influx of people of colour. Not the case in Easter Europe which still is mono ethnic with Nation States dividing these ethnicities on agreed terms, and these Nations sovereignties respected by one another due to common cultural and historic struggles. Somehow you managed to suggest that 95-85% mono ethnic groups should become a mixed race group within 50 years because that is the trend of America, which begin an influx of foreign immigrant both from Europe and Africa, as well as parts of Asia... And then developed into a Federalised Nation where over time these groups mix. Completely different contexts. And the effects which you described would be pretty much forced ethnic cleansing if forced onto any foreign nation.
    6
  46. Just like Glorifying UK. Yeah it's richer over all... But even for the poor Slovakia it has higher ratio of people of any kind facing poverty... Meanwhile some of the places are barely any better than the commie buildings (often the commie blocks are fine in EU because they were renovated, painted and so on). But UK... Row multiconnected houses, small rooms and tiny garden.. if not a gravel or concrete plot instead of a garden... If a garden at all. And then.. the cities are still far less green over all. (Ps I live in UK)
    6
  47. I dare you to do a video covering Czechia and Slovakia, their differences and similarities.
    6
  48. This is akin to Germanization and Magyarusarion policies pre WW1
    6
  49. For you lot... I know I am a Slav from a west Slavic country as my name suggests.... What I mean Lt it that people from similar cultures are more willing to assimilate,or certainly their children would be near fully assimilated to Poland. Which is different with fortger removed foreign cultures
    6
  50. The only time we don't hate on Hungary
    6
  51. Irrelevant
    6
  52. Actually, Czech was more defined than Polish even in 1300s. Plus Poland didn't even have a well defined alphabet which is why you ended with so many letters.
    5
  53. Born in Germany and raised in Germany, influence by German culture and social structure. Differences yes, but so are there among any Jews from Different places as they get influenced by their environment too
    5
  54. Haha I am on his 3rd video and I was suspecting it. Based on the way he is talking, the words he choses and his accent in English.
    5
  55. To add to the above. He is Czech, I am Slovak. He made a video about Central and Eastern Europe being "Based". The left within the region is split as you tend to have a fairly conservative left which may be pro LGBT but not keen on migration and cultural changes from outside of the country. It's this weariness built by historic struggle to self preserve in an aggressive area. Hence why I am traditionalist but also keep on progressive issues within the group. He even gave an example of Left Canadian leaders who had a conservative outlook and got called out for it. He made a point there that you don't get a 50/50 split.
    5
  56. I think my main issue is seeing all the issues... On one hand you have the demographic world crisis mentioned. On the other you have clomate chnage where 1.5c in near innevitable and if temperature goes to 2C it will start a loop pushing it to 5C just because of the systems collapsing (at 2C rainforests can't maintain humidity, too much mwlt of permafrost and so on which in a loop adds more greenhouse gasses whilst removing natural ecosystems in a negatively loop). Amd then you get these little things that one can notice... Like humans in cities showing behaviour of caged animals and zoo kept animals ... Also adding to the demographic crisis... And then you see that the temperature and natural environment changes also push wild animals towards different reproductive patters or lowered ones... And you just wonder... Is this demographic crisis a mix of modernity and the climate?... Who knows.
    5
  57. Me a gay man from Slovakia whom always wanted to have kids and family. I did my degree and live here. I talked a lot with people my age (around 19-23) about kids. I mean a lot of us were at the end of Education, live was discussed, goals ext. A lot of the time I was asked what reason do I have for wanting kids. ... Nothing was a good enough answer. To not be alone when I am old is apparently bad and even rude, making me seem like someone needy and controlling. To carry on tradion (I was raised to understand nature around me, explore folk, arts). That was apparently too nationalistic (bearing in mind that I also like to study other cultures, their arts and traditions -by no means calling mine better than others). Saying to have someone to love and care for - too needy and selfish. There just was no good answer. To a certain Irony when it comes to relationships as a whole rather than kids. I was one of the last to be in a relationship, but many of them already had several. They often expressed frustration over the couple culture where cheating, people not being interested or Changing their mid was very frequent. Somehow I was called, almost universally as the "person who is likely to get into a relationship and then stay in it forever". So far that's working out 3 years into a relationship. All the people I know already changed atleast one... Apart from a German girl with a Slovak boyfriend who were together for over 5 years. - so I concluded that these is a strong overlap between what makes it right to have kids and then ... If you don't look towards having then , preservation ext... Your relationship goal becomes much more loose and less Couple Goal oriented. The few couples that I know and we're indeed together for few years are the only ones that keep striving towards housing ownership, more so those who aim to have some kids.
    5
  58. ​ @sancaisancaii  Thank you. It sounds like a bit of a crisis of "ideology" which I seem to see more in Eastern Europe. In a sense, first of all (some someone else reading this) Conservatives are pro rural and working class in general in Easter Europe (unlike in the west) but do share a similar voting population. They, as you described seem to have few "revolutions" where their opinions and stances on long term issues shifted and developed. It think it because these parties are often conservative and traditionalist at their core but understand that there is a new value base and that times are different, whilst they often retain their (For monoethnic Eastern Europe) ethnic national stances (which in the west would be Racial- egg US for Americans- who is an American? And you get Black hate- such difference makes no sense in Eastern Europe) They developed or are developing what their actual stance to let's say gays are, as you showed, but want it to be still a Nation State. It's lie.. far right parties shifting more progressive to be able to be conservative for the culture and Nation, languages and identity as a whole
    5
  59. Please don't. Eastern Europe suffered enough by forced Christianisation and crusades which killed of our ancestors.
    5
  60. Well you might want to look into that... You would realise that it not "Europeans" as much as 14 countries out of 40... In Europe. What you mentioned was done by Western Europeans.. not central nor eastern Europeans. These did not have colonies, often did not even had empires... And often underwent cultural eradication policies themselves. This includes Slavery... The biggest slavery before Atlantic Slave trade was out of Eastern Europe... This includes Crusades (yep... Just like into middle east, there were crusades east...)
    4
  61. In my opinion as a central European who lives in the UK. The UK has somehow remained more culturally British than my home country of Slovakia. It's an ironic thing as in Slovakia the progressive side is too progressive (I say that as a gay man) where as the conservatives take points of Foreign conservatives... And as such destroy the actual traditions of Slovakia. (Best example - family units. Famously conservatives always bring up nuclear family units despite the fact that Slovakia didn't have them until 50/70 years ago and they still aren't a complete norm.
    4
  62. ​ @johnjourneyman  it was quite neutral when it came to the explanation of the Russian demographic and the challenges the Russian federation will face due to it. The topic was just brushed on as a certain new catalyst with a likely result akin to other such wars and the underlying trends.
    4
  63. Perhaps the actual Fairlure of Russia to advance in Ukraine any further, and revolutionary groups popping up within Russia is evidence of the trend not continuing...
    4
  64. It goes to show that it's not always Racism. It's used like a blanket reason for issues. Racism is often but a simptom of different issues from what I keep noticing. That doesn't mean there aren't just racist people. But if you take your home country Sweden, if there wee to be rise in racism it would be a symptom. Not a cause. If you were to imagine that the immigrants taken in were to assimilate, I doubt Sweden would struggle and racism might even go down. On the other hand, if you take the Anglo-sphere. The British empire exported it's culture very much and so, countries like India gained a Hella lot of British culture. This thus makes it contextually far more likely to assimilate into the modern Anglo-sphere culture. The racism as a pure originated from the large social and economic desparity. Be it formally in the US, or informally at the begging of the Atlantic slave trade where the rich, extremely well of people were buying slaves from less rich waring kingdoms. It was the disparity and life differences that enables it, then the race came the obvious visual difference which through generations made it basically the "Jewish star" to be looked out for. There are ofcourse other factors... But you can see that when assimilation into culture happens, the countries rarely care as a whole.
    4
  65. ​ @curious_one1156  lol that is one of the most uneducated comments... "Immigration is a recent concept"... No it isn't Even the Romani Gypsies are immigrants from India that came during... Middle ages.
    3
  66. ​ @joshjonson2368  yeah Right... Because it wasn't the Germanics whom ended up sacking Rome...
    3
  67. Depends. You have to account for the factor that there is never a 1:1 ratio between sexes. Thus statistically many tend to be forced not to have kids. Then you have people who are infertile. You also have people who are told not to have kids due to genetic disorders. And then you have same sex couples which are often not permitted to have kids.
    3
  68. I am a somewhat rarer member of your Audience. I am a Slovak who is close to Czechs... So somewhat similar background. I live in the west.. I am gay... And for an obvious reason i am not a suporter of far right. I often don't see the sense in comparing or setting the ethnic and migration policies as some right wing opposition against gays. I see them as completely irrelevant and not related topics. Sure, the birth rates are down... But they are down everywhere in the world but africa.. and gays already make a rather small portion of the population. So not a trouble related to gays as much to simple living standards and life goals.
    3
  69. ​ @MarketsDriveTheWorld  Africa is not a bordering country... It's a continent.
    3
  70. I mean it wasn't a successor. You don't get to be the successor of something, if you first had to declare a Sovereignty War because you were vasalised, then had to conquer first all of Rus (Belarus and Ukraine). And then you had to conquer the other Eastern countries that already were not Mogol Empire.
    3
  71. There have always been 4. Immortal industries. Agriculture, Building (still need even when people disappear), sex work and funeral services.
    3
  72. Never again. Go away with these unacceptable and indecent proposals that were used to kill millions of Europeans.
    2
  73. I too live in the UK. East Midlands. I wonder if you can see the contrast. The other day I worked with a Pakistani. I thought he was a first generation migrant due to his thick accent and missing words, not using then right..... Turns out he is a third generation migrant, even his parents were born in London. There you kinda see the preservation paradox. Lovely guy but you can see the system is not working.
    2
  74. 3. Canadians cleansed the land of Canada as they settled the region. Ethnic cleansing is also a lot more common in Asia and Africa than in Europe... So you are missingormed it seems, or heavily biased. Plus, he stated that Canadians have the full right to decide and he was not telling them to do one or the other. He just described the situation. You just ignored the whole video
    2
  75. 5. Somehow that means that any culture that has self preservation in mind turns into a genocidal machine? By that logic you would have to enforce colonialisation to prevent the homogenous countries from becoming such machines... Which is two sides of the same coin as
    2
  76.  @jerzyzbiaowiezy6249  um.. that the 1400s not the dark ages...
    2
  77. Umm.. it does.
    2
  78. ​ @alexandrub8786  exactly my point about them (Americans) starting as immigrants form many places. They had a new start, and so intermarium happened, especially as the spread of Christianity was enforced, even on the people of colour. Yet still, native Americans and even Afro Americans more often than not do not inter many. They do, but the rate is the rate
    2
  79. ​ @lvnick915  Climate change stuff won't go out mate. Not until the issue gets solved. The issue which is observable by naked eye..... TBH eastern Europe could take of and shift from car manufacturing to green technology manufacturing which is not that far off... Which would also put us at the economic frontier and utilise Capitalism to rise, strengthen whilst reconnect (in a modern way) with the old Slavic tradition of nature preservation..
    2
  80. Meanwhile the Poles became stereotipednas "the best workers/tradesmen". If you want something done at a reasonable price, or even have it expensive but make it actually work - you hire a Pole. Keep hearing this since i moved here. I have English accent and majority can not tell i am foreign (i am not polisb anyway)
    2
  81. ​ @kaiserbauch9092  Historically speaking that should not be a problem if the place they reside is sufficient... I am sure you know of Multi-generational housing which used to be the norm. 3 generations under one roof was common. But it is not now, and neither is there sufficient housing over all, especially for nuclear families. So i would see this a a culturo-economic factor.
    2
  82. I feel this way to deep being Eastern European in Western Europe... Britain. It's weird for me to see people compare the gypsies to black people in the US. I come from a country which is one of the top in the world, has an extreme equality index by any measure. There is little gun violence and almost no incidents of police killing or abusing them. The state frequently gave them newly built housing blocks which then got destroyed by the people who lived there. Then promoted miriad of different ways to give them housing such as Build Yourself - materials and skilled help free. Most of the issue spans from lack of education for many reasons - not just provisions but refusal by the people themselves to gain primary education ext. It's a complex mess but a very different one to US. Also due to its commie past and post Imperial oppression mindset (the nation was oppressed by another ruling ethnic group)... The old are leaning to Russia due to the commies, whilst being bad... Being the first to care ... A little bit but not that much (they seemed to be good because they redistributed wealth that was already here). They reject US due to Imperialism and cite ... Beside conspiracies actually some sensible points such as Cultural conversion, Forced ideas ext. Whilst the way they put it is BS. The concepts of these lies is in truth.. that there is such influence and that it comes here like a big packaging. At the same time I can see why the young often abandon the older, traditional stuff seeking western benefits... But they abandon everything from traditional symbol, car for the land as a nation, alter the language faster and faster over time. Start to see our history through US lenses. Eh .. there was a Gu of our ethnicity whom managed to get a noble title, learn languages, get big so today. Make his way into French imperial government and administration system which was extremely racists agains any foreigners including us, managed to become administrator in Madagascar ext. A lot of great achievements... He gets called enslavor and that's the end. No strive for determination. The folk hero whom stole from rich and gave to the poor is just a thief. All of the religion and traditions around it are bad.... And so on and so on. This split is then overlayed by another US export... Trumpist Populism and boom. You have a country split 50/50 pro Rus and pro US. I think both sides are somewhat idiotic and personally I would chose progress with adapted tradion. Adapted tradion is still Ours, it's still unique to us, we can relate to where it came from here and what our current values are. A thread that ties this society together. After all what does not adapt dies, what adapts too fast might undergo either a shock or just become something completely different from the original... Which basically is death of the culture.
    2
  83. Slovaks, Czechs and Poles would work. Hungarians would not.
    2
  84. Where exactly did he do so? It's all fairly easily traceable to sources - facts...
    2
  85. ​​@fdhgbjskthe first point makes very little sense since LGBT make a rather small part of the society. Secondly, woke is not LGBT. Woke is many things from race to sexuality, to transgender issues , to Extreme feminism. Especially as the flag he showed was not a pure LGBT flag and includes race. (Plus, the LGB has basically nothing in common with the T) I am gay and I would agree that the woke idea in the extreme sense makes nonsense. I agree with pretty much all of his content regarding demographics. But I fail to see how gays would impact this.. especially as many gay people do want kids and have families. Heck lesbian women often try to conceive themselves. So sure they may not add to the fertility rate but they do aim to raise kids via adoption - which, in many ways, should still increase fertility rates as those who give their kids. Away can still reproduce without the burden of care.
    2
  86. What you mentioned didn't happen. Fall of role didn't force assimilate any non European foreign population. Fall of Rome enabled new leadership of Germanic origin which were European in origin. Some of these adopted the legal frameworks of Rome, like Germany/HRE mixed with their native legal system. Some adopted the culture and remained ethnically unchanged as the leading class was too small. Like France, Spain and Italy.
    2
  87. He mainly just describes the trends. There is racial change. And there is also cultural changes after by it... Which affects economics. Once again, he mitigates any form of racism where he doesn't particularly critique well integrated migrants who don't hinder economy - wherever they are from. He simply admits that based on cultural/ethnically.proximity, one is the more like than the other to do so...
    2
  88. The best things that could happen would be for Russia to lose its influence and propaganda and for Czechia Nd Poland create a "pan-wester Slavism" which they could try to promote at least as a cultural and linguistics connection to be celebrated. This would diverte a lot of pan Slavism and those who find appeal in pan Slavism but aren't keen on Russia.
    2
  89. You can't dilute ethnicity. Ethnicity is not genetic...
    2
  90. ​ @vh5663 it equates. It was the begging of a civilisation in that region because Celts never had a legal nor unified state in the region. Hence the first civilisation - but yes Sami was the first.
    2
  91. Which is where most of Easter Europe differs as they like to keep separate and respect the separation and Sovereignty of nation states.... Yet see large tourism between one another and closeness, often, with Slavs atleast, even celebrating the differences in a friendly way such as Poles and Slovaks meeting and trying to speak with one another, using each others language and doing the customs of the place you go to exactly as they do it.
    2
  92. They weren't. Slavs existed since 1500 BC according to archeological evidence. Germanic people existed since 400bc according to archeological evidence
    2
  93. ​ @mitonaarea5856  I'm the context of history:. Germanic tribes migrated out of the region, slavic tribes settled there. Replacing the population. Afterwards, Germanic people conquered, assimilated and crusaded the region, whilst gradually resettling and mixing with the Slavs on the region. Later Prussia, an originally Slavo-Baltic but akin turned into Germanic through conquest and crusades became pomôcke of East Germany. Hence, whilst yes Germanic people were in the region prior, they moved out and were replaced by Slavs. Afterwards, the Germans gained the territory back but didn't replace the population, they assimilate it and culturally conquered it. Largely akin to how Franks ended up giving name to France and Italy basis in culture and Politics, but most of its population remained Latin and celtic.
    2
  94. ​ @feliz2892  He did not say Muslims are the only ones with kinship... Christians can too. In fact, you whole explanation supports his expansion as High levels of Kinship groups (basically extended family and keeping things to the family) is what actually results in smaller, but more distinct groups... As explained by you. Because if your extended family keeps remarrying around their relatives like second, third cousins.. of someone from other branch of the wider clan, they will keep retaining their features... Hence making a smaller group, but more different from the outside.
    2
  95. ​ @asmirann3636  you totally missed what was written in the comment...
    2
  96. ​ @user-nm9qd6bo6h Reconquista which was nothing like the current situation.... You are comparing carrots to turnips just because they are vegetables.
    2
  97. Wtf would advocation for nuclear family be any sign of progress? You want to split families and tradition and part of the socio cultural make up which is not holding anything else back for what reason?
    1
  98. It's always a bit sad that Czechoslovakia did not work out. The argument that the two people groups are separate is somewhat null in this. Britain is a country of 4 nations. Germany itself was non existent a century before Czechoslovakia - most Germans did not refer to themselves as German until 1900. France is akinly a conglomerate of nations such as Burgundians or Aquatine. All of these groups were in the end about as different as Czech and Slovaks (if not more) and they all managed to become one group or one country. The problem here was that Czechs leadership never subscribed to their own words. EG. The British leadership became British before the rest of the country and they always refered to all as British first. Similar with German unification. Poland as an exception managed to overcome itself regional differences where the east and west of Poland was about as similar as Czechs and Slovaks (but the wars and conquest made them united).
    1
  99.  @EB-jf5oi  yeah Belgian, British, Danish, Duch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Swedish. Adding to it the Imperial power of Austria-Hungary
    1
  100.  @EB-jf5oi   @EB  well, as far as the colonial period goes, Russia was western at the time more than eastern. They very much competed with Western powers, adopted Roman title of Caesar (Tzar) and claimed to be the successor of Roman Empire. Besides... The topic was European... Which Russia still was and is. Not western or eastern colonialism. Besides.. Russia overall is and was the biggest coloniser of Asia... One of the mentioned continents. They were also the biggest Humiliates of China, taking most from them which is a little ironic.... But just further goes to show that at the time, Russia was very much a European Colonial Power.
    1
  101. "this country" where again? How is anyone meant to know where you are? ​ @MarshallTheArtist 
    1
  102. ​ @diogo7905  the numbers are not ordained by EU. You also do not have a clue who He votes for...
    1
  103. Hi. I am a Slovak that lives in the UK. The thing with the UK is that they actively invited people from the commonwealth to migrate into Britain as soon as the 1950s. They did so as a way of maintaining some Imperial influence after the forced US dissolution of the Empire. This is why you have a lot of well integrated migrants of various descent. Basically, you had migrants which traveled for economic reasons but we're already familiar and invested into British culture and language via the Empire, more so, people aspired to become the "posh" image of an Englishman which boosted integration. This is also why some communities, such as Indians, make more money than the British on average (in the UK). Same as Slovaks make more money in Czechia than an average Czech. (Culturally similar, linguistically similar, educated migration). The issue they have with migrants currently is because the nature of migration changed. They are in a housing crisis and need 6. Million more houses, there are more economic troubles which are not as visible as demolished houses post war. The migrants started to come from areas Not from the empire or not from well established imperial areas (not familiar with Britain and it's culture).
    1
  104. Funny how you mentioned Leeds as overwhelmingly white. While it is true that Leeds has 85% white population (80% British) it's also known for being an absolute nightmare for driving due to many middle eastern and Asian (Pakistani or Indian) drivers as they "don't give a F***" and shouldn't really be permitted to drive without having their skills tested by a UK Agency.
    1
  105. There were many things like this. Czechslovakia has Talent for example, or any such cultural singing/performance events are both joined. A lot of Sports are also joined - eg Paragliding always has Czech and Slovak championships at the same time in the same races.
    1
  106. ​ @richie_pp yes there are Non-Serious ones. Both by youth romanticism of the first Czechslovakia and by the communists elderly who like to claim Czechoslovakia akin to some Czech on the desolate Scene.
    1
  107. The thing is that you can have some parts of culture which transcends the different cultures within.
    1
  108. IT not wrongly labeled. It's not a historic map. Just because Czechoslovakia made it illegal to label it doesn't make the map wrong...
    1
  109. Well sorta. In the US the make up of "nations of Nations" is made up of predominantly all immigrant defendants, be it willing or not. And then you still see the enforcement of the largest (white European Decent) onto the other (partial European or non European Decent). In Russia you have a land of lands where the groups are ethnically native, and a major that is non native. So the playing field is fundamentally different
    1
  110. 1. Obviously not. There is a difference between many conservative values and they are very varied. Imeg in Europe it would be a conservative value to be chivalrous and treat women like ladies... It not so black and white as you suggest.
    1
  111. 2. No country in Eastern Europe holds the views you claim. That's just blatant over generalisation based on minority political views...
    1
  112. All of western hemisphere is classed as wester civ.... All of North, Central and Southern Americas.
    1
  113. ​ @FOLIPE  yes. Mainly biological warfare and seigne tactics.
    1
  114.  @andrewpalim1978  That his nothing to do with Polygamy. Simple non nuclear families that are norm even in half of Europe help it...
    1
  115. Not sure how it is a betrayal. If one shows issues which prevent people from having kids... They can't betray their argument by having just one kid.
    1
  116. ​ @IgorDruzhinin-qo2vj why would Rusyns and other Western Ukrainians not be peaceful? In fact, western Ukrainians are likely more peaceful than those in the east. As far as Peace goes for Slavs, Western Slavs are undoubtedly the most peaceful of all Slavs. Essentially being between a Hammer, Second Hammer and an Anvil (ottomans, Germans and Russians) made them not war among one another much, nor expand outwards. Eastern Slavs are war full, the just comes with Russia. Balkans also have some nasty stuff but overall for Europe not that much, and not that much compared to Russia.
    1
  117. Only if you are incapable of interpreting data. Baby boom in communism is equitable with baby boom in western Europe and the US... And with baby boom in Asia. One from better conditions, be that given by USSR as housing and basics of security within pre 70s times. Or the actual post war boom pre 65...
    1
  118. Personally I grew up pretty much considering slovaks and czechs as the same nationality (Narod - nationality - in cz and svk traditionally equated to ethnicity in many ways). I always saw the linguistic continuum/ dialectal continuum from western czechia to eastern slovakia - a single stream of accents and dialects. It also cool to.see that in writing, prior to the Standardisation of both kanguages in the 1800s, the dialectal continuum was far far stronger. But it does sadden me how separated we are now. Many of the cities is slovakia remind me of czechia but there is a lot of small desilated rural areas which oull it all down.
    1
  119. That actually Spain... Sagrada Familia
    1
  120. ​ @c.f.okonta8815 isn't making content for conservatives. He is making content for everyone who is interested in demographics. I am a gay migrant. I come from a kin culture to Kaiserbouch. He is Czech, I am Slovak. The country I moved into is the UK. It's the sort of migration that Kaiser actually supports and voiced his support for. Dno if you don't pay attention to him... A kin culture and a kin ethnic group, with a migration which is willing to assimilate. Sure I won't have my kids but the kids I will adopt will grow up to be white British, in British culture... I am also a traditionalist, support folklore, national and traditional arts, architecture and linguistics. You seem to be making very heavy line in what makes someone far left or strong left rather than just left-leaning. All I tend to support would be classed as conservative, with the exception of women and being gay. You even get a natural lack of understanding for transgender people because the issue between gay Vs transgender is very different and shouldn't even be in the same discussion. Hence you get many conservative people who are left leaning. It's what built the post war boom. Internal tolerance Vs external conservatism. You are good with those on your side and boom, but wary and competitive to those outside..
    1
  121. What does "breaking his cooking streak" mean?
    1
  122. ​ @PradedaCech  Russians turned everything Russian into Slavic, just so they can Claim all things Slavic. Czechs seem to be denouncing all things Slavic, despite being Slávic, to further separate them selves from Russia...
    1
  123. I find it very funny how many comenters claim you make content for conservatives-only. It's like they ignore what your stances are in your videos where you largely suport left ideas within a given ethnicity but also criticize left ideas for their externally (migration) policies. Generally you aren't sexist, you even state suport for left politicians with a sensible conservative outlook (such as the 2 canadian ministers in this video). It's as if one could not support liberal values on the inside whisly aiming to preserve their cukture and ethnic group. Ironic, since you so often mentioned that these liberal views are what we so value in our modern cukture eg great european relationships between neighbours (compared to past), travel, ext .. the general freedoms we gained aftter the fall of socialism in the East (i am slovak, you are czech). But also criticize the migration and lack of assimilation because we love our goven cukture, and by ignoring this factor we would love the very same liberal part we so admire.
    1
  124.  @jerrybi8400  nah. They aren't a proxy because these groups are still not well perceived in "the west". They are seen as simple revolutionary groups that are doing their own thing and are often criticised or talked about critically as they themselves are not all then good. Just as Azov is criticised in the west... But you would not care about that because you just want your native to be one way stream...
    1
  125. Not sure how long you subscribed to Kaiser but he made clear why, especially in his Eastern European video (being from the region himself). 1. Ethnicity is not race. You can get people from different countries in certain amounts and they generationally assimilate. 2. Struggle for survival. Imagine a country, eg Kenya or other colonial settlement that had a history of being slaughtered and forcefully replaced. They struggled to survive and retain their culture. This is similar in eastern Europe in countries that were under foreign imperial Rule. (Eg. Czechia). So, the culture naturally is not keen on drastic ethnic (and by extension racial changes). Of course they don't mind in limited amounts as assimilation is the key. The more akin to the place of origin, the more migrants from there are suitable. You get a lot of Vietnamese in CZ. They are well liked as migrants. First gen usually segregates a little, but within a generation their kids fully culturally assimilate and internariage is common. Within 2-3 generations the culture is beyond fully adopted while they also assimilated ethnically.
    1
  126. I would add to my comment by stating that this cultural understanding of Ethnicity is what makes Europeans recognise Roma and Jews as ethnicities of their own. As they were largely forming bubbles of their own communities in medieval times... For good reasons and bad ones (on their own and with external pressure too). It is why assimilation is crucial as a concept when it comes to keeping far righ from the leadership. Essentially, there is no reason why more unified Europe (be it just cooperation like eu ) wouldn't have became a powerful block rather than a developed battlefield.... If the immigration was not over permitted and assimilation happened whilst they (successfully) promoted or supported fertility even just to 1.8/1.9 (and not 2.1 or higher)
    1
  127. It's not given as a very long term policy... We are talking min of 50 to 500 years. Given the danger of the weapon and longevity of effects. If anyone had it and for any reason they had a revolution, or a new sudden regime....
    1
  128. Since when did US donate any group to attack within Russia.
    1
  129. ​ @Jaba22-t7y Russians can shut the f*** up. They still have an empire and aim to make it even bigger... So they can s.t.f.up about the native peoples of the areas they hold, growing more numerous in Russia... Or even within the European part of Russia.
    1
  130. I wonder where you lived. I came from the north, north west Slovakia and growing up everyone agreed communism was quite bad. You had few unusual people who liked socialism because it basically gave them a job but they weren't loud nor affluent. Even within the military people kept liking Czechslovakia and hated Russia, especially hated 1968. I listened to countless stories by elderly about the events of 68 and the fear and nonsense it brought. And strong hate towards Russia was definitely a thing even among kids in school in Žilina. Dno how that changed. I would even say that Slovaks have a now cultural sentiment to raise their kids with the words "leave as soon as possible" and many were told this in my wider family as well as in school. Hence probably why... They were from the more liberal, Czech liking and Russia hating population that kept seeing the continuous decline.
    1
  131.  @johnisaacfelipe6357  😂 what a joke. "Homely" work is not a work type description. Homely work involved taking care of animals, butchering animals, cleaning carcasses, shoveling shit and cutting fur... It involved a lot of digging and crop maintenance in the field. It required loading of hay and wheat and offloading of it. It was homely purely by being in the area of the home... Meanwhile a man was a set labourer that went to be a labour in a mine, forest, or other set labour force. 😂😂 "Easy and safe" is such an umbrella term. Safer than a mine? Yes, safer than a forest where bears are or trees might fall on you? Yes... Safe from animals? No... Easy? No It's well recorded in writing. Even on film! Plus I can just ask my great great grandmothers and grandfather's, as well as grandmothers and grandfather's ...
    1
  132. I would compare Black Americans and White Americans to old India. In India. The cast system segregated groups. It did so very efficiently to the point that over the millenium there it prevented intermixing between people of different skin colour and led to the creation on A. Overall shared culture and B separate cultures living in one area.
    1
  133. ​ @shezyam460  sure. If you strap a woman on a bed and force her to breed you would have a Patriarchal society with the highest ever recorded birth rate. But that's also against every single cultural aspect that we have. Not sure if you haven't paid any attention to the video or completely ignored any information in it.... But it was stated many times that you can't just roll back the clock.
    1
  134. ​ @vh5663 just because they named the land doesn't make them Civilised in any particular way. The Celts were all but gone even before Western Roman empire or even the Full Roman empire fell.. So yes the Celts were not really a civilisation in their own sense and had no unified nation or state there...
    1
  135. ​ @branimirnikolic4559  you are a hypocrite that shouts that someone is Arrogant and yet you show so much arrogance and ignorance that you are incapable to even entertain a thought without judging it. So yes, you are an idiot that gets easily swayed by propaganda.
    1
  136. People here are so convoluted. They seem to associate the economic issues of Brasil with the races Brasil has... Rather than see the race and the economic issues as two separate entities, which they in reality are. Being white doesn't guarantee cohesion, wealth, education or prosperity. Just looking at many eastern European countries makes that rather clear (where, without being actively pulled by western nations, many in the east would be like a white version of Brasil or worse). Meanwhile you also have factors like Indians making a rather large part of well off people in the UK. On average Indians make more than whites, but that's an average between those very well off and not.
    1
  137. Interesting. I grew up very traditionally in extended family. They are all very traditionally minded people but simultaneously are progressives. I am gay, they don't mind, they still want me to have kids (they just, some of them, partially turn their head when they realise it's gotta be adopted- but they go "oh well"). I am talking about an Eastern European Slavic traditional family with many in the military, many catholics (actual church goers), and a fair amount of elderly including great grandparents, siblings of grandparents, my grandma's aunt.... Yet... They don't care much for race per say (if you marry someone non white it's fine, just raise your kids with the home culture in mind- even when you live abroad, just so the kids are aware). They don't care for me being gay... They still want me to have kids (they actually push my Gay brother to accept himself because he is tooo religious and does not accept himself... Litteraly you have 70+ old catholics that go to church tell a 30yo man to judge shut up, accept he is gay and move on.... He won't) I want kids, always did, and I knew I was gay since age of 8/9. I moved to England and when we talk about kids with anyone... The answers are exactly as you put it. It does not matter if they are gay, or straight individuals or couples... The answers is exactly as you put it. There are few women I know (we are all around 20-25) and these women are some of the few that actually are in a long term relationship. Most are non British (but moved here before the age of 10, thought visited home often), but some are British. These women actually want kids. When in their late teens they said they feel really weird urge to have a child, they could not explain too much why but they do. They are some of the few women whom seem firm on staying in one relationship even if it's not always peachy. And as they grew older (me included) we all started to give up on this child-having goals to some extent. Mainly by concentrating on provision on housing, and by lowering our desire for the amount (one said 5, then jokes about her v*** after, not she wants atkeast 2.... I went down to atkeast 2 too). But the urdmge is still there. Btw... With me, and it's strange and I dno how to describe it. Being a fairly conscious kid (both of my environment and of myself). I figured that I am more attracted to men somewhat simultaneously with my desire to adopt. I wanted to be a father iné day as early as 7/8 years old. I have also figured I am gay around 8/9 years old.... And I have never gelf any desire to have my own biological kids and always felt the urge to adopt instead. Like... I was 9 and I already decided I do not want my own but to adopt.... Weird, but why not. I just sorta thought that well if I am gay (as I only fully accepted it around 13/14) the. I suppose the urge to adopt makes sense biologically rather than to reproduce on my own. ... Only later discovering that many animals that do show gay behaviour do seem to have a tendency to adopt.
    1
  138. I do have to say. Well done dad. He was always a bit philosophical and stoic military man but never unloving and uncaring. He did have more of a Provisional Love language (to provide as an expression of affection) but just listening to him about social development, history, folklore and traditions (where they come from, how they affect us and all) and even hearing the story of a Man who makes 3 coins (one for his father, one for himself and one for his son)... Sorta explained the basics of social economics which most seem to totally ignore.
    1
  139. Not sure if you have not paid attention but Religion, ethnic difference and immigration are all inherently tied to demographic structures and population. They affect birth rates and longevity. Sometimes they affect the rules due to certain ethnicities/religious groups having a bigger say within the ruling of a country... Which then further affects the demographic make up. You effectively cannot afford not to talk about Ethnicity, Religious make up and Immigration when you talk about demographics. Equally... To be even remotely racist, you would have to state that one group is lesser than the other. Which did not happen in the video. So by definition of Racim... It cannot be racist.
    1
  140. ​ @radeksilar543 well no. Despite the thousand year rule many Slovaks have nothing to do with any Hungarians. Heck, even after doing genetic tests there are no Hungarians in them for many. Czechs have been more mixed with Germans.
    1
  141. I always thought and still think tht the biggest mistake of Czechoslovakia was not industrialising and not urbanising slovakia fast enough. Sure, sending educated class there is a help... But czech police won't produce Slovak police supporting Czechoslovakia. The industrialisation and urbanisation would have cretaed a class of inteligencia slovaks wmthat Wii have grown within Czechoslovakia.
    1
  142. ​ @greyralph1637  plus it would be trickier in Eastern Europe for historic reasons. EE is mainly Slavic. There is still a lot of memorandum regarding the enslavement of Slavs for Arabic Slave Trade and for the Ottoman Empire. Including theft of children, raising them for war, and sending them back to kill their own mothers. So the society as a whole is on a "look out"
    1
  143. ​​ @FOLIPE  um. Slavic migration was in 5-6th century into the regions of far eastern Europe (Russia) and southern Europe (Balkans). Slavic "homeland" is in Eastern Poland and Western Ukraine.... As far as 1500BC... So yeah. Slavs did not really migrate. I'll also add context of history. The Slavic migration begun once Rome fell and Germanic tribes moved out of East Germania, and after the Huns mixed power up in Europe. There after, from the 5th century onwards you have the emergence of Slavic states. There all begun as Rod (Clan) confederacies. Most notably Unification of Poland under the Polanian Slavic tribe. With majority of unifications happening from 8-10th century when Germanic tribes stabilised in the West and begun reconquering the east Germania (which they left, they didn't not get conquered). Germanic expansion Eastward, Magyars incoming from the east and Byzantium turning into Theocracy where Christians could not be enslaved (but pagans could) triggered a wave of unification among Slavs. That why Kievan Rus emerged, Great Moravia, Poland... It's also why Slavic Monarchies traditionally do not/did not have Divine Right. Monarchies of Slavs traced their heritage to Farmers and Plovers. The Bohemian kinds even had peasant shoes during coronations. But hey... The Germanics still went eastward and hold and behold they turned Prussia Germanic... Conquered Poland and Habsburgs then got hold of what was great Moravia. Meanwhile Kiev fell and got conquered by Moscovites whom had adopted the tactics and aims of their Mongolic overlords (that rules them for a century or two). This all having a pinicle in WW2 where France and Britain would just disregard the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia, appease Hitler... Hitler expanding eastward and killing off people.... Or claiming the land because there were German colonists. So as far as East Central and Western East Europe goes.... It had indeed been in a Struggle where foreign powers and ethnicities tried to take over the region for 1500 years... Even through, historically, Slavs were extremely Hospitable even to those whom were enemies ... As even Christian Missionaries and Crusaders recorded how Hospitably Slavs were to them as individuals and did not blame them for actions of other Christians (that burned the Slavic temples).
    1
  144. ​ @PistonHonda87 The demographic changes in Spain due to Reconquista was also not ethnic... The people simply assimilated because Reconquista did 2 things - land conquest and forced assimilation/conversion. Linguistic enforcement too...
    1