Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "Who Will Dominate Eastern Europe?" video.

@ZAMAKOVO yeah. Besides certain parts of actual way of thinking I do think one is from Eastern Europe, the other is American. So I often saw them more reasonable for American oriented content, but then saw so many .. dno what to call it... From wrong stuff to just either ignoring or having no clue about the underlying cultural contexts
28
How would you describe them over all. You said they are pro Ukraine but what about other opponions. LGBT, other alliances, economic outlook (desire to have more trade elsewhere) or language policies? I as as I myself send to describe myself as Progressive Traditionalist (eh I am pro choice, I am accepting of Gays (I am one heh) even though I myself have no clear option the deeper LGBT stuff (general don't care much but observe it). I personally want traditions to be around, even religion in many forms, thought I believe many need to adapt to suit modern values.
20
For the demographics of Poland. How much do you reckon will immigrantion into Poland better Poland. I mean east European immigrants. As due to the well prevention of Poland and it's similarities to the rest of counties might make people assimilate and take on Polish culture more than any other immigration
17
It's not fear mothering. He isn't stating it as some conspiracy. He states it as the Facts and Data state it. 1. Religious groups tend to have higher birth rate and retention of culture. This in Atheistic Europe with low birth rate, and hight immigration with high Religiosity (and birth rate) will over time cause a demographic ethnic change. Eh. Britain went from 94% British to 74% in leads than 30 years. This has nothing to do with race tho, as stated, it's about culture, ideas, ideology and understanding of the society of the country where large influence of people from non democracies and from regions with vastly different value systems will inevitably affect the democraticy of the country they move into. Descendants of migrants don't tend to harbour any form of patriotism be it showed in Democratic care, general care fro the area nor if it came to the defence of the country in case of an attack. Hence even stated in the vide that even Emigration from Ukraine into Poland is not a good thing long term wise (talking decades). These are long term goals which are needed in Europe to have a functioning democracies which is someone Americans rarely understand. You often connect these demographic things with Nazis and their Nationalism... Meanwhile forgoing the fact that it was Nationalism, The threat of Outside and the continuation Ethic and linguistic erosion of the region which made the brand of Eastern Nationasim... Which developed and established Nation States. Meanwhile akin ideas when put onto Imperial powers such as Germany, Britain or even the Ottomans harbour danger where they connect it to their Imperialism Glory and this it just another extension of such Imperial Glory.
15
Well. It even ironic what you read about Slavic history and Christianisation. Slavs were a decentralised tribal democracy akin to the native Americans and resided in Europe for 1000/1500 years before 5/6th century CE. Rome kept the region around as they were peaceful and non problematic, meanwhile they fought the Germanic and Celtic peoples more west. Rome fell. The Franko-Germanic states be it East Frankis empire or Later HRE then expend east around 5/6th century. Sonia, Byzantium also went north... And the Horde came from the east. It's said that Slavs centralised due to external threat where the clans were unified under a leading clan in order to defend from external attacks. Centralisation of Slavs mirrors the periods of attacks a lot. Especially that of Poland which united a fair amount of Slavic Tribes.
12
@DungeonMarshal I mean they have a small population but far more productive population than Russia. They have higher birth rate than Russia and a lower demographic decline than Russia. Russia runs on pensions and pensioners.. it's bound to collapse
10
@purpledurple621 like I said... That's the very Anglo-sphere point of views which in fact does not reflect the majority of the word. Once again you mixed what ethnic and race is. You made ethnics a race issue which it isn't. Ethnicity is not a race, norna sub race, it a mix of cultural, linguistic and sup-racial. Which is also why emigration form closely allied and akin places works more and also has a lot more assimilation which results into the people becoming nominally ethic and their descendants becoming part of the Ethnicity over all. You point something that was racial and centered around places which actually had slavery and influx of people of colour. Not the case in Easter Europe which still is mono ethnic with Nation States dividing these ethnicities on agreed terms, and these Nations sovereignties respected by one another due to common cultural and historic struggles. Somehow you managed to suggest that 95-85% mono ethnic groups should become a mixed race group within 50 years because that is the trend of America, which begin an influx of foreign immigrant both from Europe and Africa, as well as parts of Asia... And then developed into a Federalised Nation where over time these groups mix. Completely different contexts. And the effects which you described would be pretty much forced ethnic cleansing if forced onto any foreign nation.
6
For you lot... I know I am a Slav from a west Slavic country as my name suggests.... What I mean Lt it that people from similar cultures are more willing to assimilate,or certainly their children would be near fully assimilated to Poland. Which is different with fortger removed foreign cultures
6
Born in Germany and raised in Germany, influence by German culture and social structure. Differences yes, but so are there among any Jews from Different places as they get influenced by their environment too
5
@sancaisancaii Thank you. It sounds like a bit of a crisis of "ideology" which I seem to see more in Eastern Europe. In a sense, first of all (some someone else reading this) Conservatives are pro rural and working class in general in Easter Europe (unlike in the west) but do share a similar voting population. They, as you described seem to have few "revolutions" where their opinions and stances on long term issues shifted and developed. It think it because these parties are often conservative and traditionalist at their core but understand that there is a new value base and that times are different, whilst they often retain their (For monoethnic Eastern Europe) ethnic national stances (which in the west would be Racial- egg US for Americans- who is an American? And you get Black hate- such difference makes no sense in Eastern Europe) They developed or are developing what their actual stance to let's say gays are, as you showed, but want it to be still a Nation State. It's lie.. far right parties shifting more progressive to be able to be conservative for the culture and Nation, languages and identity as a whole
5
@alexandrub8786 exactly my point about them (Americans) starting as immigrants form many places. They had a new start, and so intermarium happened, especially as the spread of Christianity was enforced, even on the people of colour. Yet still, native Americans and even Afro Americans more often than not do not inter many. They do, but the rate is the rate
2
@lvnick915 Climate change stuff won't go out mate. Not until the issue gets solved. The issue which is observable by naked eye..... TBH eastern Europe could take of and shift from car manufacturing to green technology manufacturing which is not that far off... Which would also put us at the economic frontier and utilise Capitalism to rise, strengthen whilst reconnect (in a modern way) with the old Slavic tradition of nature preservation..
2
Which is where most of Easter Europe differs as they like to keep separate and respect the separation and Sovereignty of nation states.... Yet see large tourism between one another and closeness, often, with Slavs atleast, even celebrating the differences in a friendly way such as Poles and Slovaks meeting and trying to speak with one another, using each others language and doing the customs of the place you go to exactly as they do it.
2
They weren't. Slavs existed since 1500 BC according to archeological evidence. Germanic people existed since 400bc according to archeological evidence
2
@mitonaarea5856 I'm the context of history:. Germanic tribes migrated out of the region, slavic tribes settled there. Replacing the population. Afterwards, Germanic people conquered, assimilated and crusaded the region, whilst gradually resettling and mixing with the Slavs on the region. Later Prussia, an originally Slavo-Baltic but akin turned into Germanic through conquest and crusades became pomôcke of East Germany. Hence, whilst yes Germanic people were in the region prior, they moved out and were replaced by Slavs. Afterwards, the Germans gained the territory back but didn't replace the population, they assimilate it and culturally conquered it. Largely akin to how Franks ended up giving name to France and Italy basis in culture and Politics, but most of its population remained Latin and celtic.
2
It's not given as a very long term policy... We are talking min of 50 to 500 years. Given the danger of the weapon and longevity of effects. If anyone had it and for any reason they had a revolution, or a new sudden regime....
1