Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

  1. 63
  2. 18
  3. 15
  4. 13
  5. 11
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. I don't think that would work out well for the monarchy (though we till never know). Part of my recent research was observing and analysing the rise of socialism and democracy during 19th century (they were closely interlinked) and what i can see from it is that Industrial societies indeed had a push towards the "left" Because of the extreme wrongs it was doing to day to day people. Death, pollution, noise, accidents, housing crisis in urban cities, rural depletion in the country side. One can see why Marx thought it would be industrialised society like Britain, not pre industrialised like Russia. But really it was because whilst industry caused issues, it enables a lot and the British Parliament was weary of revolution... Hence you see them being 'kinder' through means of services, societies ext... Developing into democracy. But pre industrialised Russia already had extreme amenity/quality of life issue which they didn't solve... Then war broke out and the stabilised UK managed but destabilized Russia fell because of the discomfort and poor conditions of the working majority.... Hence all work related stuff was made central, as means of production, now enhanced by communist industrial efforts, could provide amenities.. But... They instead just provided a war warehouse and corrupted central power... So it fell. So really what the Tsars needed to do was simple... Provide for people. Get schools, clinics, parks ext. Prepare for the industry which is booming in the West... After all you have the advantage to see it's problems before you start...
    2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. Ironic honestly. When you look at sci-fi or any well perceived functional world which people would pick to live in and or inspire real life by ... They are always culturally diverse. Start wars or Mandolorian? Look at the architecture and their clothing first... Very neo classical but also futuristic. Same for star trek- the exploration and meeting people of such varied cultures. Heck, the most popular "alien" race are the ones that are the most Classical in cultural appearance and even philosophy of life (Vulcan, Romulan). Whe we imagine the world of horror and future... It technologically there, but polluted, filled with exploration and cold metal, sleek but dark. People dressed modern but usually poorer... What o mean to show here is that Entertainment can reveal a lot about ourselves. Whether it is US, Korea's, Europe or China.... The moves and costumes as well as world building and architecture that are always popular are the "classical " ones. Korean dramas are on rise set in mediaeval and classical Korea, or else heavily inspired by it. Same for China. US and Europe with said Start Wars, Game of Thrones, Lord of the rings. Entertainment is a seekers game. People like what they see and they seek it in return. What's ironic is that even when we have Apocalyptic movies or TV shows which kill most humans on earth... The survivors rarely Rebuild.... No.... They almost always form a Neo-Classical sort of societies with district art, architecture, folk and even stories.... And even if Futuristic, the Classical/Historic inspiration prevails such as in Marvel Universe. It such a common similarity shared across so many cultures and nations that it does beg you to stop and entertain the idea of WTF Humans actually desire as their Urban or Societal Environment.
    2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. Being a foreigner from a traditional yet liberal upbringing (gay)I was always told by my peers that I seem like the person who would get onto one relationship and that's it. I did get into one and I am still in it. Meanwhile my pool of sexual partners was always low. In many ways I am a very conservative person (in terms of values, tradition... Not your idea of economical and liberal or Capitalist conservatives ---- to me the conservatives would be Commies) but as a gay guy I am liberal and so is my family. They value the old family values and structures without their underlying gender norms per say. Eg. Bringing a boyfriend for a Christmas dinner is a big deal for us... Not to my Western friends. Meeting their whole Family is a big deal for us... Not to western friends. There is still an expectation to be a parent even as a gay person (which would actually be near impossible where I from) but not to my Western friends. I know my upbringing was different as it's liberal side was obviously not the countries norm.... But as someone who comes from an ethnic nation state... My traditional upbringing was that much more around due to my families keen interest in traditions, out ethnic history and development ext ext. In a patriotic way (not nationalistic- you don't spread it, you celebrate it). So quite often I get stuck in the questions like : why kids? Why aim for marriage/partnership ext ext. With always having "some ridiculous answers" such as " so that when I am older there will be people around me whom I know, they know me, I love them, they love me, so that we can spend time together, so that I can pass on history and take joy out of their joy, to have someone to keep me on my feet and someone to keep my brain spinning whilst we explore nature and environment around us". That's apparently ridiculous, selfish and unrealistic reasons to have kids I get told by every peer.... Yet it's litteraly the only thing that you do when you have a good relationship with your parents and grandparents... As what better reason do I have to have kids than to have them and to let them be the way they are whilst spending time together?
    1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. Somehow you started with middle east and israel. And halfway through you just talked about the US, Pax Americana and US internal politics... Kind of barely relevant when it comes to the domino effects of the region and to the world war. As US involvement would not be the first of the dominoes, but one of the last ones... The only relevant info is thatbUS is divided to the point that anyone is willing, and able, to make shots against their foreign policies and stances. But that's not a trigger, not the pattern of stating a ww3... I have been your subscriber for about 5 years now. This is thus far the weakest video from you due to not actually talking about the point of the video. The start was good. A lot of the middle east regional thoughs were excellent... But then it just west down after half of the video. Especially as US entering some middle eastern war at the start would likely not cause a world war, but in fact would prevent it. Not because US would win... But because it would be seen as yet another US conflic to bitch about to gain more PR qnd support. So more of a grinder before war than the world.war. Heck. I offen agree but very kften disagree with a lot of your ideas or conclusions but I see the oatterns you see and a lot of reasoning as to why tou see it. I personally distain Pax americana and it's the N3 in terms of dislike after 1.Russia, 2. China. (I am not American). But i do not mind the US as a country. Not to worry. I dislike the EU too... As an European... A gay one, and a migrant frlm east to west. Not due to the idea of unity, but abismal socio-economic approach.
    1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1