Comments by "M Simon" (@msimon6808) on "Social Media Sites BEG for 1A Protections from SCOTUS as Conservatives Show Political CENSORSHIP" video.

  1. They are publishers if they control content. I have to ask if you got my message. That means they publish.
    5
  2. "So then a private company shouldn’t be allowed to deny service based on personal ideologies or religious beliefs, is this where we are going?" Are they a common carrier or a publisher?
    2
  3. I used to have a clearance. They spy on me anyway.
    2
  4. Absolute consistency is not possible - because language is one reason.
    1
  5. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. etc.
    1
  6. Citizens sue. The courts handle it. Then you get a body of common law.
    1
  7. It actually creates problems. Silencing corps is not a good idea.
    1
  8.  @ComplyAndDie87  There are things you can't advertise to buy and sell. People say.
    1
  9.  @NateWilliams-h8q  If the government can't initiate cases then citizens control. Sue for defamation and censorship. Or publish everything.
    1
  10.  @JasonMaaskant  Categories help limit infringement. Child 5exual exploitation for instance.
    1
  11.  @NateWilliams-h8q  Letting everyone speak = government control. I read about that kind of thinking in a book once.
    1