Comments by "M Simon" (@msimon6808) on "Trump attorney issues chilling warning on immunity case" video.

  1. Because the immunity was 'de facto'. It was assumed - until Trump.
    2
  2.  @youngmarl9351  We hope to get it again come November. Have you seen food prices? Gasoline?
    1
  3.  @robertwelsh4094  "How did the DOJ control four different Grand Juries in four different states? Are you insane? or just plain evil?" That is the innovation. In 1960 all they needed was Chicago/Illinois. And when it didn't go well they shot him three years later.
    1
  4.  @loneskankster2242  "There's never been a criminal like Trump before" They couldn't find a real crime to charge him with (very unusual as you point out) so they made up crimes.
    1
  5.  @masonhunter2921  The check on the President is impeachment.
    1
  6.  @youngmarl9351  I didn't chose high gasoline or food prices. Joe did when he spent money without taxing. I did make a better choice. And I watched all election night. It wasn't the first time I stayed up to see an election stolen. That was 1960. Nixon was gracious enough not to complain. A mistake.
    1
  7. In a banana Republic - yes. It looks like the GSA shipped pallets of classified documents to Trump just before the raid. That will taint all the cases.
    1
  8. The GSA shipped pallets of classified documents to Florida just before the raid. That will taint all the cases.
    1
  9.  @JellieThePink  The Indians didn't do so badly. They now have a government willing and able to protect their interests. Something they were unable to do.
    1
  10.  @2fuzy  To make sure? The question has yet to be officially decided. That is the trouble with de facto. It is custom "we don't do that" - not law.
    1
  11.  @tankfu1  There isn't any immunity. He can be impeached for misdemeanors. Only Congress can do it.
    1
  12. For 250 years we didn't have Banana Republic, Lavrentiy Beria, prosecutions. We had in 2022 Democrats running on get Trump platforms. That is in fact unconstitutional.
    1