Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "RE: NS is Socialism | Responding to your counterarguments and Further Explanation" video.

  1. Nazis are exactly what they call themselves. They're National Socialist. They supported a Socialist Economic system but backed by an extreme sense of Nationalism, and Cultural and Ethnic Preservation. You can argue, they were neither left wing or right wing. They were something quite different. In some respects the Nazis were magically two extremes combined together. They pretty much created a Right Wing Alternative to Communism in an attempt to "Crush" communism within Germany itself, create a system that supports many of the Socialist ideals that Communist would want, but at the same time support Nationalist Agenda that Anti Communist Want and you make it difficult for either left or right wing followers to have a reason to stand against you. Ironically it's a similar approach to which that Otto von Bismarck took but the Nazis took it so much further.
    1
  2. +White343 "... and you're telling me...." Definition of a Failed Argument when you start your comment with a phrase that "Implies" I said something that i never said. Oh I really hope your composition professor backhanded you while in class. But i guess I can make this more colorful. "Harassing and Oppressing Foreign Minorities (Roma, Jews, etc.) and Intellectuals (Free thinking and well educated people)." Counts on the minorities both regimes targeting different groups. It's no Secret that Stalin as well treated minorities quite badly. His treatment of the Cossack, Tatars, and none White Orthodox Christians was pretty bad. He forcefully migrated most east of the Euro Mountains, if not had them murdered and put into labor camps. On top of that, didn't the USA do the same? With specific Laws literally in place limiting freedoms, and rights to millions of minorities who were not White Christians? She didn't have to be a Communist or Socialist Regime to do so. Marriage and property Laws in states like Alabama and Missouri comes in mind, ironically being in place decades before the Nazis instituted similar Marriage Laws. "Censorship against Free Media." Neither the USSR or the German Reich was Media Free, so how can one Censor Free Media if it didn't even exist? Prior to the National Socialist taking control of Germany sure, there was free Media but that completely disappeared shortly after. USSR it didn't really exist prior to the Soviet Regime coming to power. That being said Censorship of the Media is something that exist even in the USA. Through Finance, Advertising, and Special Interest ownership of Media Companies. If you've been on youtube over the past Decade You'd see it quite loudly how Media on just Youtube Alone is Censored. Videos get Demonetized, Adverts are Pulled, Videos marked as Offensive no longer show up on recommendation list, and what is censored can often derive from a single word or sentence in said video. Ironically and not surprisingly it's the same form of Censorship that existed in the 1930s/40s when Charles Lindbergh gave his speech to the America First Movement, when he stated and I paraphrase, "news papers that carry anti war articles began to lose advertisement." "Making Concentration Camps for a Specific Minority (Roma, Jews, etc)." I doubt there is a major power on "Earth" that hasn't made concentration camps. Be it some worse than others. I can think of the USA in particular had Interment Camps most known the Japanese, but lesser known we also threw German nationals into prisons in a smaller scale, and the Filipino Insurrection's Concentration Camps, and at a larger scale Indian Reservations which were basically Interment Camps without Fences but they were guarded by the US Army and forbidden to leave said territories. That being said in both world wars interment camps and concentration camps were a very popular thing. Even the film 7 Years in Tibet the entire story revolves around a German National captured by the British (ie a Civilian) who was thrown into an Internment Camp. The camps in France the Germans used were already built by the French to house political prisoners before the war even started. "Seizing private companies for Government use." Ironically this primarily happened in the USSR, not Nazi Germany, well unless you're talking about occupied territories. If you were a German Citizen odds are you wouldn't of had your business stolen, property ceased, money taken. Unless you're taking about the later years of WWII but desperation during war time calls often for drastic measures. But you can do a simple google search and you can find plenty of examples of this happening in the USA, a free capitalist society. US Government just has to do a stroke of the pen and it can still forcefully take land if it's considered necessary for national security, and it has in the past. "Never exists in both of these factions." There he goes again putting words into someone's mouth actually thinking he has an argument. It's adorable.
    1