Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "Actually, Leftists aren't STUPID people" video.

@cptpayday2080 That is actually one of the issues I have when dealing with Marxist. Marxist are Nationalist, the Working Class is their Nation. So for a Marxist the Nationalization of the Means of Production = Giving The Means of Production to the Workers. For A Racial Nationalist like the Nazis, Nationalization of the Means of Production literally just means taking business away from those who are outside the "Race" and giving it back to the "People" who are the "Race." Marxist fail to understand that what they want is nearly identical to what Nazis want. The only fundamental difference is one is built around a Social Class, and the other as Racial Class. You can apply the same thing to Feminism as well. Feminist want to use the State to force business to hire more Women regardless of qualifications. For a Feminist this is the Nationalization of Business. If women are in charge, and they're Feminist, their Nation is Women, so Women run business is the Feminist idea of "Nationalization" whether they realize it or not.
47
@WinstonSmith22 Best part between the destination which I did not mention that this subtle difference having a large impact is Private Property. For a Classist Ideology like Marxism built around the Working Class. Private property has to be illegal, regardless. As owning the means of production would forfeit you from being a member of the Working Class. For a Nazi, this isn't true. The Nazis proudly appropriated land/property from Foreign Nationals or what they deemed Resident Aliens. Beyond this as long as you could prove your property was being utilized for Society you technically could still own your business. I know TIK has gone into depth how that technically isn't true, but I'm presenting it from the Nazi's perspective why they consider themselves Socialist yet Marxist can not understand why or how they can be. It all stems on Classim vs Racism. When someone realizes Nazis are Racial Socialist not Class Socialist the fact they didn't Nationalize all the Means of Production but did to Foreign Nationals well it should make sense. As without being classist appropriating all land/property isn't exactly necessary as along as it's owned by the "Race" or by Extension those within the Party.
7
@WinstonSmith22 I find you bring up China a bit fun. I've seen Socialist Argue whether China is State Capitalism or Market Socialism. If they're having that argument it implies the functional differences are vague enough for it to be an argument. Meaning TIKs argument that State Capitalism is just another phrase for Socialism comes off as more true than Socialist want to admit.
6
I think the issue with the left, is they push charity away from personal responsibility, over to the state. Making Charity no longer an individual's responsibility but... a requirement by force. This in turn takes the personal aspect out of charity, and people hired by the state to watch/help people a "Job" and not something they do voluntarily out of their own kind heart. How in any way can that provide a superior service?
3
He didn't say conservatives are fascist/nazis. He was expressing the Leftist point of view of the Right and Conservatives. I mean I literally recently not even 40 minutes ago just got bombarded by someone on one of TIK's videos posted repeatedly copy/pasted quotes from Richard Evans, and Kellner trying to prove the Christian Church was in league with the Nazis, in spite of the fact you can literally go to the Holo** Museum's website, and it literally tells you why, and how much the Church resisted and eventually resorted to collaborating and keeping their heads down because doing otherwise was well dangerous, and the Church decided to protect it's people, ie members of the clergy vs resisting. Which means the Church didn't willingly side with the NS, unwillingly collaborated. Despite being an atheist I'm willing trying to defend the Church's actions and why being conservative didn't have anything to do with it. Yet trying to convince people of such things, when they're already imbedded deep in their minds that the NS Persecuted just about everyone regardless whether left/right conservative or liberal is hard for some to grasp because they've been conditioned one way or the other. He even posted a list of Political Parties he called Right Wing, even though one of them wasn't, that supported Hitler's Enabling Act. I literally had to show him how every single one of those parties was forcefully dissolved within months after the Enabling Act. Literally being bullied/harassed/pressured into closing their doors by the NS who promised they'd be a Collations. Of course he dismissed it and spammed more copy/paste comments. One of the parties leadership even became parts of the anti Nazi resistance, but of course..... that doesn't matter to someone that nuts.
2
Classism is on the same scale as racism. It's an issue most of the world has as well. China and Japan in particular. Instead of treating people as individuals they're treated on their social standing.
2
@WinstonSmith22 I think you'd love Mobile Suit Gundam Unicorn. First episode has the protagonist making so many assumptions based on his "education" while his views are being challenged all around him. Even by episode 2 he still thinks the wrong people attacked his home.
2
Best way to realize it for someone who knows little about Religion is look at the word Capitalist. To me the concept of a Capitalism is made up, and Capitalism technically doesn't exist, at least in the Socialist sense. It's a myth, a naughty word created to make heretics for their follows to destroy. Marx literally took antisemitic stereotypes and merged them with John Locke's pillar to a free society which is "Private Property." Locke made the right to own private property that was untouchable by the collective community, ie the state as a pillar/foundation for a truly free Society. ie without Private Property that couldn't be infringed upon by the Group/Community/State you can not be truly free in Locke's eyes. Socialist rejected this concept, spat in the face of actual liberalism, and worse even dared to steal the word liberal while standing against the primary pillar that is necessary for liberalism to exist. They then merged it with antisemitism named it Capitalism which itself sounds evil, and created a myth, a 'devil' that has never truly existed.
1
Socialism and Conservativism are not forbidden from being a part of each other. I think the greatest mistake people make is mistaking Liberalism/Leftism as being exclusive, and Conservatism/Rightism to being exclusive. In turn they think Socialist cannot have conservative values, and that capitalism is restricted to Conservatism itself, in spite that the entire Capitalist system of Private Ownership is built on a foundation of Liberal Values of Individual Rights, and John Locke's list of said values including Private Property rights outside of the collective community. He didn't just state it should be a right, but it was absolutely necessary for a Free Society. As with private property that was separate from the state in which a state couldn't encroach was the only way a person could be free. Yet.... some how Capitalism is associated with Conservatism. It's a serious contradiction really with the socialist narrative. Capitalism is Liberalism literally practiced at an economic level, Capitalism can not exist, without liberalism. This is why I have no real issue with calling Fascist or Nazis conservative. Just because they are, doesn't mean they're right wing. As it seems Liberalism, at least real Liberalism must be on the Right, or is on neither. If it's on the Right, or Neither, no matter what that means Socialism can include conservatism just by the process of elimination. Though it wouldn't stop me from defending conservatives because many conservative movements resisted Fascism/Nazism. It wasn't entirely liberals.
1
Actually you need to uncorporatize and reduce the regulations on the medical industry. America's medical industry is literally run by large syndicates that do not call themselves syndicates. This ensures there is no competition in the market. Best example when my State tried to make a program to get Drugs cheaper from Canada, the same drugs being sold in the USA, the FDA literally cracked down saying they couldn't ensure those drugs are safe. Seriously..... People have no choice and without choice they can charge whatever they really want and get away with it.
1
"A Person Is Smart. People Are Dumb, Panicky, Dangerous Animals And You Know It." Agent K.
1
TIK has pointed out quite a few times how the UK system isn't capitalist.
1
@mrk8050 Yes but sadly it doesn't turn out like that. I imagine doctors to be civil servants volunteers someone that does it to help people. If they work for the state it is just a job if they run a clinic like an assembly line and sadly some do it's also a just a job. In this respect they have no pitty in bankrupting someone as they didn't become a doctor to help people but as a job.
1
All religion is a cult. Including Ideological "isms" For example, the word Capitalism is not an ism , being a Capitalist isn't an ism as the word itself was created by socialist to damn property owners, heck John Locke style liberals even as Private Property Ownership Separate from the social group/community/state is literally one of Locke's Cornerstones for a Free Society of individuals. Socialist reject this. Marx himself used the stereotype of the J ish people combined with John Locke liberal property rights to damn actual liberalism and tried to tie it with interesting enough pre-existing antisemtism. So by this, the very concept of an actual capitalist doesn't exist. It's a myth created by Socialist. All Capitalist are, are people who have achieved John Locke's idea of individual freedom.
1
@savagesnayle301 Yet Marxism dominates almost every aspect of those who associate with the Left whether they realize it or not. They spend decades touting the "Working Class" and "Feminism" which is Gender Marxism. Now modern day social activist on the left are obsessed with what is accurately described as Race Marxism. All aim to take control of the means of production for "Their" Social Group. Context of marxist including social democrats it's the Working Class. Democratic Party itself is primarily built on a Social Democratic Platform which is a less extreme branch of Marxism, which advocates reforming society unlike Marxist revolutionaries who want a complete changing of the current world order. Feminist replaced the Working Class with women, and demand business be run literally by women, go figure. Their socialization of the means of production is women running the means of production, and the state because men are naturally evil and can not be trusted in their eyes. New Activist now fight for "Social Diversity" though openly want to exclude the new bourgeoisie (white men). So their socialization of the means of production is forced diversity and the removal of social groups from positions of power who they deem not "diverse" enough. Basically they're all Marxist in nature with oppressed vs oppressor. They just have different ideas on who the oppressed or oppressors are. With the goal of giving power to what they deemed to be the Oppressed while stripping it from who they deem to be the Oppressor. It's a core tenant of Marxism and all ideologies built off it. Heck even the National Socialist viewed the world like that, with the International Jewish Capital controlling the world and oppressing those deemed in their way, it's why nazis built their entire world view on Victimhood just like Marxist. Even today Nazis view themselves as victims, the oppressed. it's all the same nonsense just different social groups running the movements.
1