Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "Forgotten History: Violent Jewish Resistance to the Holocaust" video.

  1. 9
  2.  @mortarriding3913  Wasn't the point of the comment entirely. The point of the argument was "The fact that violence can save lives is often ignored or forgotten." in which the original comment quoted. I made an argument against it. It utterly has nothing to do with who shot first, or who was the most dastardly. In fact how the Allies handled the occupation of Germany and Japan are prime examples on how a lack of 'violence' saved lives, not the other way around, while the German occupation of Poland, Ukraine and Belarus in which were very violent only caused violence in response, that violence didn't save lives, but only encouraged further bloodshed. It was a vicious cycle on the Eastern Front. I guess i can put it bluntly. How many towns, villages were raised to the ground in response to Partisan warfare on the Eastern Front? How many thousands were rounded up and shot in attempts to deny Partisans' access to intelligence, food, and shelter? How many died as a result of these "Violent" agitators? They had reason to fight, but in the end it's easily argued they did nothing but add considerably more fuel to the fire, and more often than not, it wasn't the Partisans or the Germans they fought that paid the price and were burned. That being said. It's also often not told that there were Communist Partisans, Pro German Partisans, Pro Democratic Partisans as well, and they often didn't work together, nor care for eachother. In Ukraine, Belarus, Russia and much of the Balkans these groups warred with each other about as much they did with the Germans. That same Israeli General I mentioned, whom i wish I could remember his name ended up leaving the Partisan group he was in a Communist one primarily because they didn't care a lick about Poland's Independence. Also I do recall one of the concentration camps was also attacked by Partisans, not to save the inmates but they didn't want the Jews released late in the war, ie an antisemitic band of partisans. Similar to the Frei Korps of Germany post WWI, partisans were little better than armed thugs, who cared about their own personal political beliefs and agendas often more than the nations they claimed to be fighting for.
    7
  3.  @Lowlandlord  Well I take my opinions of Resistance in comparison to what happened on the eastern front. Reprisals against armed civilians by both the Germans and the Soviets were brutal. Entire villages were destroyed. Entire towns and some cities emptied into concentration and labor camps. Millions died directly and indirectly often in response to increased violence, and the response to that violence only got worse as the war went on. Even Resistance Fighters in the west were not immune to this violence. Sometimes they're not even shameful about it either. For example in Belgium Leon Degrelle's brother was murdered by Belgium resistance, only because he was his brother, not because he was a fascist. He worked at a pharmacy. The men who killed him are considered "heroes." Despite that they literally just murdered a person just to personally hurt someone else emotionally. Leon Degrelle's response was quite horrific, in a fit of rage he wanted the entire town killed. Ironically the Germans ended up being the more modest ones and rounded up known political rivals they believed had some responsibility, which ended up being only three people. Because some Belgium "Patriots" believed they were heroes for bumping off a Drug store owner, 4 people ended up dying. It is hard for me to respect a lot of Resistance Fighters definitely when I know this likely happened too often. How many of them did something that ended up getting someone else killed? Hey, at least they get to live, hiding in a basement or woods somewhere but the poor farmer and his family down the road didn't.
    1