Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "news.com.au" channel.

  1. 3rd supply location I've seen attacked in the last few days. Seems all that 'secured' territory isn't very secured. One of the strikes I watched as a precision mortar strike, and by mortar strike, infantry mortars. Despite being a camp and ammunition depo Ukraine soldiers were able to get close enough to it with mortars to destroy it, so cocky were the Ukrainians they even filmed it with civilian drone so you'd see the strike, flew over the camp so you knew it was occupied with soldiers before the strike as well, 2nd shell that landed, was a direct hit on their munitions supply meaning they knew what they were aiming at as well.
    3
  2. Putin's mistake was not going all the way in 2014. Ukraine wasn't caught with it's paints down this time.
    1
  3. I think it's just equipment falling off the vehicle, it was struck on the back right side. You can see the skid marks on the ground where it abruptly stopped just before the footage we see. Mean while there is burning equipment near the back of the turret at the beginning. When the vehicle turns around some of the reactive armor, and equipment fall off, some still burning. It's not bodies. It was likely hit on the back right side while the turret was still facing forward, turret turned to it's left which is why equipment on the back of the turret is still burning while part of the rear/right side of the hull is also burning. Footage starts already after it stopped and turned it's turret so we don't get to see why it stopped, but you can see the evidence on why it stopped from the fires and the skid marks, it stopped in a hurry. I'm going to say the men in the Trench are likely Ukrainians, and the tank accidentally stumbled into a hornets nest. As it was struck on that right side first, and the trench with the men is on the right side of the road.
    1
  4. The Russian Army is making itself look so unprofessional.
    1