Comments by "BoogieMonster Mom" (@boogiemonstermom677) on "Real Stories"
channel.
-
You may not be able to blame people for not being properly trained, but you can most certainly blame the people in the position to ensure they were trained right?🤷🏼♀️
Well they did know you enough to stop and talk to you, and ask a personal question pertaining to someone you all knew. He was automatically trying to distance himself from them to not look suspicious, but still maintain a secure place within this to manipulate the outcome.
Why would they delete a record of someone suspected of child abuse, or any abuse for that matter? It should be mandatory to hold onto to that if there's ample amount of accounts, and the school not doing their due diligence to check their workers out? That's shameful. They're supposed to be our children's protectors away from home.
Hard to pass judgement on the girlfriend. I've personally been abused like her, but I don't think I could've covered for my x if he was a pedophile and child murderer. My life wouldn't have taken precedence over that. Child endangerment was the very reason I got out of that relationship and pressed charges. My son was starting to suffer at the hands of his anger as well, and I couldn't allow that to happen. I didn't care what happened to me. I had to keep him safe.
The whole criminal record system shouldn't be done away with, only revised to show just violent offenses such as pedophilia, rape, voluntary murder.
Well this and many other cases prove that people DON'T do their job properly, so are we just supposed to let children and other civilians pay the price for their laziness?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Personally I don't think I would have a child if I had a disability that would prevent me from caring from them entirely on my own, unless I had one with an able bodied partner. I don't really think it's right for a child to have the responsibility of being a parent to another child, let alone multiple children. If a parent is eligible or has the capability of having outside, adult caregivers come into the home, I feel they should utilize that so they're children can actually be children.
I'm a bit worried for the kids with the blind parents. They don't seem to be being looked after properly. Definitely not saying they should've been removed, but I think it should've been mandatory for them to have outside help. There's way too much put on the eldest ones. Their living space isn't clean, neither are the children, nor is it big enough for a family that size. Seems like the children are in desperate need of more emotional support as well. They're not processing their emotions properly, and they're not receiving adequate mental health aid to combat this. The way the oldest one responds to certain situations is quite disturbing. She showed more emotional response and compassion towards the little neighbor girl committing suicide, than she did towards her own sister's attempt. That's quite shocking imo. The parents just don't seem very emotionally or physically involved with any of them, and that's most likely affecting the way these girls are interpreting the situations their being put in and their responses towards them. It's like they're just having them to guarantee they have at least one or two that will take care of them later on, instead of having them out of genuine love. They're born for specific jobs and nothing more it seems. I find this story the most disturbing and worrisome.
I wish the single boy would've been given outside help too. He seems so depressed, so lonely, and stretched thin. His eyes seem so sad and almost empty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Gap it really depends on how it's done. If they're not keeping a count on the animals, and over hunt them, then no it's not conservation, but if they are keeping a meticulous count on how many there are, how many are being added back into the population due to births, and are putting a cap on how many are allowed to be hunted in a given period that doesn't interfere with a sustainable population growth, then technically it's conservation because it's applying regulations to the hunting of these animals that allows for population growth but prevents overpopulation that could negatively affect their environment and all other animals that live within it, and it makes it difficult for poachers to obtain profit because there's not as much of a demand for them. It's like in the US where some states have specific hunting seasons for specific animals. It keeps the population down so that the ecosystem in that area isn't damaged by overpopulation, but it prevents overhunting as well. It's supposed to provide balance. I'm not sure if that's how it works here though, because I haven't finished the video and I'm not entirely familiar with the area they're hunting in. I'm basically just saying there is a way to hunt animals, no matter if it's for sport or food, and it not have a negative affect on their population and environment, and in some cases it can actually conserve their species because it can have positive affects on the specie's environment if this is all done right. If it's done right, it then just becomes a matter of individual values, ethics, and sense of morality if they choose to engage/support this or not. Again I'll say though, I have no idea if this way of hunting is actually being applied here though. It is Africa, and people have a bad habit of overhunting and exploiting animals over there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I wonder why they're cutting back on legal aid, doesn't everyone have the right to legal aid there?
Aw how sweet, they have matching pants 😂. Sounds like this guy needs some anger management classes. Maybe just separate, they seem pretty toxic together. A court may be able to force him to get some kind of help, but if there's no true desire within, forced help rarely works, or it works for a time but old ways start to creep back in. No desire, no continuous follow through.
Um, get some help too Stephen, seriously. 🥺
Someone obviously identified those boys, so they had to have known of them to know their names or where they lived. Kind of makes you wonder, who did those boys upset enough to give them the impression they'd be capable of violently mugging a little old woman? Does someone have a grudge against them and if so, why? Why was everyone ready to jump in them rather than defend them? They have their killer, but these questions still go unanswered even though they also deserve to be.
The benefit case is kind of sad. From the documentaries I've seen, benefits there are very hard to get by on, and it can be almost impossible to without doing something under the table because if you report that income that's making things a bit easier, they take away from what you're given, and you're put in the same or worse position than before.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1