General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Django
BBC News
comments
Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "Is the UN warning of 3.1C global warming a surprise? | BBC News" video.
@cd0071 Childish response from someone with nothing to say.
2
Except its not. A handful of rich people have much higher carbon footprints than scores of poor people. It's not about overpopulation, it's about overconsumption.
1
How?
1
Happer isn't a climate scientist and takes money from fossil fuel interests to push the denial narrative. Lindzen has also taken a lot of money from the fossil fuel industry; Cato Institute, Heartland Institute, Peabody Coal. He also doesn't believe that smoking is a primary cause of lung cancer. That's how seriously he should be taken...
1
That's a mad claim. You got any evidence for that at all?
1
@cd0071 Nine people who "may" have been involved. "May" being the operative word there but you've got it doing some serious heavy lifting.
1
Well, we aren't in control. We started something that's spiralled out of control.
1
@jamesjamieson6181 Enough to cause at least 1.5c of warming.
1
@jamesjamieson6181 It wasn't.
1
Yet you believe in chem trails...
1
@paulpalmer9970 I should ask you that. For you to ask me that doesn't make sense. Which is probably on brand.
1
You sound really intelligent.
1
What has Musk done for clean energy?
1
To control what?
1
The rich countries ARE the massive polluting countries.
1
What's funny to me is how obviously your comment is just a template with the blanks filled in. I swear, AI is getting worse as people get lazier.
1
@cd0071 They're actually not. You can look this up for yourself, don't take my word for it.
1
Only if you're an absolute simpleton who can't get their head around cause and effect.
1
Overconsumption. Driving everywhere, buying manufactured goods you don't need, having everything possible delivered direct to your door by a driver, wanting foods from halfway around the world... yeah, "our" way of living. And CO2 is proven to trap solar radiation, they discovered this in the 1800s... keep up.
1
And how would you provide these means? Does it involve burning more fossil fuels?
1
Couldn't be clearer that you're painfully gullible.
1
@Eyeswideopen916 Don't start worrying about making sense.
1
Who is "they"?
1
CO2 was proven to have a warming effect in the 1800s.
1
If there was a solar flare big enough to do that, you'd have much bigger problems.
1