Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "Canada wildfires: Thousands flee city in 'apocalyptic' scenes" video.

  1. ​ @Mike-tb5gj Even if that was the only solution (it's not and no-one serious has ever suggested that it is), what kind of future do you think we have otherwise?
    2
  2. You obviously haven't done any research on energy weapons. If you had, you'd know that it's impossible for them to be the cause of these fires. The atmospheric bloom alone would negate any attempts.
    2
  3. You sound all kinds of confused.
    1
  4. Ah yes, the "Dominic plans"... idiot.
    1
  5. What's informing you then?
    1
  6. You've lost it.
    1
  7.  @mdb3102 You're using "anecdotal" wrong.
    1
  8.  @mdb3102  "Saving face"? In what respect? Seems like you're just throwing out terms without knowing their meaning.
    1
  9.  @mdb3102  How are you managing to be so wrong?
    1
  10.  @mdb3102  You've provided no examples and no "counter-proof" (normally, you'd just say "evidence") to show that what OP stated is wrong. Your criticism has been shallow and belies your bias. Yet you want to call other people superficial? That's pathetic.
    1
  11.  @mdb3102  As opposed to you, with your empty statements and frequent use of terms in the wrong context. Such as how you just used "context" wrong. Which is how we know you're definitely NOT a bot. Because a bot would be smarter.
    1
  12.  @bgnikstov  That's a truly idiotic statement.
    1
  13.  @bgnikstov  Meaningless nonsense.
    1
  14.  @jerryfirth6985  Nah. He and yourself are just idiots with an overinflated sense of value in your own uninformed opinions.
    1
  15.  @Mike-tb5gj  Why is it that those who feel the need to express their entitlement to their views are always the ones with the stupidest views?
    1
  16.  @Mike-tb5gj  You like to waffle, that's obvious. You seem averse to saying anything meaningful or relevant, though.
    1
  17.  @Mike-tb5gj  Case in point.
    1
  18. You clearly haven't.
    1
  19. Interesting, did you just acknowledge the dry conditions?
    1
  20.  @edmundblackadder2741  That's not what I asked.
    1
  21. What evidence do you have of this?
    1
  22. No, you've just not been paying attention for a very long time.
    1
  23. Wouldn't work. Read up on atmospheric bloom.
    1
  24.  @seanjones1020  So because you didn't understand it, that means it can't be true?
    1
  25.  @seanjones1020  You're not interested in civil discussion, you're interested in disinformation borne of ignorance.
    1
  26. Couldn't be employed in these scenarios.
    1