Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "Government assessing five groups under new definition of ‘extremism’" video.

  1. Aren't a single organisation. And it'd be quite worrying for a government to come out and say "we're not in favour of people who oppose fascism".
    2
  2. Being compassionate doesn't just mean siding with those who agree with you.
    1
  3.  @Quetzalcoatlus100 Everything you just said is silly.
    1
  4.  @Quetzalcoatlus100  Because its entirely a presumption based around stereotypes.
    1
  5.  @Quetzalcoatlus100  I'm struggling to find sense, let alone merit, in your "argument". Tell me, would you make the same argument against the existence of gay Christians?
    1
  6. ​ @wft15 That's an interesting question, since the statement you're asking it of speaks only of freedom. Which would suggest that you believe Israeli existence is dependent on Palestinians not being free.
    1
  7.  @wft15  Does it? Why? What it clearly states is that all Palestinians within that land will be free. It doesn't say no-one else can be there. But you're certainly implying that Palestinians can't be free for Israel to exist. Why is their subjugation necessary?
    1
  8.  @wft15  No, you've gone back in a circle. It only implies freedom for Palestinian people. By denying that and stating that it requires the erasure of the state of Israel, you are implying that Israel's existence is predicated by Palestinian oppression.
    1