Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "Hurricane Helene damage ‘biblical’ say North Carolina officials" video.

  1. How is it biased? Please explain.
    5
  2. Isn't that what Trump has done by turning up and using it as an opportunity to try throw shade at Biden? Seems mighty hypocritical of you.
    4
  3. ​ @guillermoelnino Are you trying to make out that there is no fossil fuel industry?
    3
  4. No, its not. Its a hurricane.
    3
  5. So humans CAN change the climate?
    3
  6. Yeah, we all know the squirrels caused this! Seriously, who else do you think it was?
    2
  7. Ignore all evidence to the contrary...
    2
  8. ​ @debl9756 Maybe that's because he appears to be posing for photos rather than doing any surveying?
    2
  9. ​ @guillermoelnino Who has claimed that the government can control the weather? Climate change recognises the effect of human industry, not of government efforts.
    2
  10. ​ @guillermoelnino Professors and scientists aren't the government. You seem very prone to hearing one thing and turning into something else in your head.
    2
  11.  @bobbobertson6249  I know that only works in the modern English language. The actual etymology of the word comes from ancient Greek via Latin and means "to steer with a rudder".
    2
  12.  @bobbobertson6249  Not really what a rudder does.
    2
  13. No, its a hurricane. If you want to know what war looks like, look at Ukraine or Lebanon.
    2
  14. It doesn't, because that would be stupid.
    2
  15. Why do you think those things are mutually exclusive?
    2
  16. What's dangerous about it?
    2
  17. You don't get out much, then.
    2
  18. Doesn't sound like nothing.
    2
  19. What's Trump actually doing, though? Is he just there for the publicity or is he taking action? Whereas Biden ain't there but he does appear to be acting within his remit to assist the state.
    2
  20. How did they "jab Trump"? They just showed what he's doing and saying.
    2
  21. He's there. He's not doing anything but he's there. That's... good? Seems neutral at best. Whereas Biden and Kamala (seriously chap, it's not hard to spell) appear to be working with relief agencies to arrange help and support.
    1
  22.  @waterloojew  If you don't follow politics then why are you commenting on politics? I don't follow sports so I don't offer an opinion on it because I'd be uninformed. That's what you're doing.
    1
  23.  @waterloojew  You might wanna get your eyes checked. My avatar isn't a picture of me, it's Luffy from One Piece. And he's not wearing a mask, he's grinning. Rash, uninformed takes seem to be your speciality.
    1
  24. Bizarre claim.
    1
  25. Why is that so hard for you to wrap your head around?
    1
  26.  @guillermoelnino  There's nothing fairy-tale about it. The greenhouse warming effect of CO2 has been demonstrated, our output of it is undeniable.
    1
  27. ​ @guillermoelnino No, I'm not interested in Thunberg. The greenhouse warming effect of CO2 was first observed by the Eunice Foote, an American scientist in 1856.
    1
  28. Which scientific paper? Just any of them?
    1
  29. That's not true, annual human output far exceeds volcanic eruptions. Its so easy to fact-check these claims, I don't understand how you fall for them.
    1
  30. They literally showed you footage of Trump taking the opportunity to have a dig at Biden so I don't know why you're acting like it's BS.
    1
  31. For what?
    1
  32. Why do you think it's propaganda?
    1
  33. You think hurricanes are "liberal ideas"?
    1
  34. ​ @mikeync-t4p Its the opposite of ignorant, as its actually choosing to engage with the knowledge on this matter. Why, what do you know that you think invalidates any claim of climate change?
    1
  35. What's your evidence for that claim?
    1
  36. What's he doing to help? All we can see is him standing around for publicity shots.
    1
  37. ​ @guillermoelnino Specifcally what steps?
    1
  38. Manipulated how?
    1
  39.  @guillermoelnino  That's not my solution, it's a gross misunderstanding of the situation.
    1
  40.  @guillermoelnino  No, it's not. Because I just told you that wasn't my solution. So how can it be accurate when it doesn't apply to the person you're ascribing it to?
    1
  41. What's Trump actually doing to help? Bit hypocritical of you to complain about "rude comments", when you're just guessing at Harris' actions.
    1
  42. That's a very disingenuous take.
    1
  43. Why definitely?
    1
  44. And you're certain of that how?
    1
  45. When did he say that?
    1
  46. Yeah, it's not like there's anything else going on in the world right now...
    1
  47.  @rangersnut  When did I dismiss this as nothing?
    1
  48. ​ @guillermoelnino When did she give any indication that she hates white people?
    1
  49.  @bobbobertson6249  If you had even a slightly curious mind you could go look all this up for yourself. Instead, you're proudly broadcasting your total ignorance while telling others that they don't know anything.
    1
  50. I don't think you know what a socialist is.
    1
  51.  @mackvismusic8622  Couple of things. Your personal experience doesn't affect whether OP knows what a socialist is. The only way that part of your comment stands up is if you're admitting to using multiple accounts. The question then would be why? Further, free speech isn't banned in Europe, nor is the continent significantly socialist. I gave no actual opinion on or explanation of socialism, so how have you leapt to the conclusion that my ignorance of socialism is astounding?
    1
  52.  @MVos-md3rp  Oh, you switched back to your other account. Really should try and be less obvious about your duplicity... Yes, my first comment where I certainly did infer that I know something more about it than you seem to. But I never actually explained my concept of socialism so how do you know its ignorant? Also doesn't change your comment about Europe just being completely wrong.
    1
  53.  @MVos-md3rp  You have 4 ipads, each logged in with a different account. Yeah, that's normal. I like how you decided it was easier to admit being part of some kind of bot farm then it was to argue the actual point.
    1
  54.  @MVos-md3rp  To what end? Or you could just answer my initial question, if you weren't lying about everything you're saying.
    1
  55.  @mackvismusic8622  You should go look up "crass" in the dictionary, then you might be able to use it appropriately. I'd say this exchange never developed into a conversation, due to your inability to answer very simple questions and the fact you can't decide which one of your disingenuous accounts you want to use.
    1
  56.  @mackvismusic8622  You obviously cared enough to mobilise your multiple accounts.
    1
  57. So you don't comprehend how climate change exacerbates these storms?
    1
  58. Your government DID help Hawaii. Why do you think they didn't?
    1
  59.  @MISHA33006  You think they've got it hard, you should see the people in the countries you're giving billions to.
    1
  60.  @MISHA33006  Its kinda the point. You're asking why so much aid is leaving the US, well, it's because there's a lot of people who really, really need it. And US foreign policy since WW2 is responsible for most of it, so while you yourself played no role in it, you have to appreciate why as a nation its not sufficient to say "not our problem".
    1
  61. What are you basing that on?
    1
  62. Because only billionaires create pollution?
    1
  63.  @brenzplace65  Right. And consumer culture, that's not a factor for pollution in your opinion?
    1
  64.  @brenzplace65  And that truth being?
    1
  65. This ain't an airport chap, you don't need to announce your departure.
    1
  66. Stop. My aching sides...
    1
  67. No. Natural disasters exacerbated by climate change, the thing we've been warned about for decades.
    1
  68. That's not true. There's actually enough evidence regarding how increased surface water temperature in the gulf of Mexico could have played a part for it to be worthy of further investigation.
    1
  69.  @guillermoelnino  What's cultish about it?
    1
  70. ​ @guillermoelnino You said "cult", now you're talking about religion. Can you get your story straight before getting back to me?
    1
  71. What action did Trump take?
    1
  72. ​ @guillermoelnino Exacerbated by human activity, to be specific.
    1
  73. Okay. But then you'd be facing different problems that people would doubtless be complaining about and demanding something be done.
    1
  74. Not sure how you've reached that conclusion.
    1
  75. So what is your god doing to help?
    1
  76. Why is that?
    1
  77. God ain't real and waiting for them to "save us" means kicking your heels while waiting for this to happen again.
    1
  78. Renegade Tribune is a white nationalist platform with links to known neo-Nazis like Michael McLaughlin.
    1
  79. ​ @EphesianRose Yeah. Because our use of them makes flooding worse.
    1
  80.  @EphesianRose  To what end?
    1
  81. But they have to report on events. If political figures involve themselves, they report on that. What in particular do you take issue with?
    1
  82. The gullible have been singing from this songsheet for centuries.
    1
  83.  @CeeCee962  If that were true then you wouldn't need to evangelise.
    1
  84. Except they didn't. They just reported on what political figures were saying/doing. Where is the bias?
    1
  85.  @christinepro  Vibes are subjective, let's focus on the objective. What about this report did you think was biased?
    1
  86.  @christinepro  If they hadn't fact checked Trump's comment, they'd be promoting a lie unchallenged. Is that what you think the news should do? Also, the channel ain't Democrat because the channel ain't US. Get over yourself.
    1
  87. What propaganda?
    1
  88. ​ @guillermoelnino Such as?
    1
  89.  @kickinkanga7026  What year do you think the industrial revolution started?
    1
  90.  @kickinkanga7026  No, you're about a century late. Mid 1700s.
    1
  91.  @kickinkanga7026  No. I'm saying that human impact on climate change goes back further than you think.
    1
  92. When did they blame Trump?
    1
  93. So are you denying the greenhouse effect of CO2 and human output of said gas?
    1
  94. What action, though? Being there isn't exactly helping. Whereas it appears that Biden was coordinating with state and emergency rescue officials.
    1
  95. It's never been claimed that storms were only the result of climate change. The point is that climate change is exacerbating it.
    1
  96. ​ @guillermoelnino Empty insults, chap.
    1
  97. No, he doesn't. What a weird lie to tell.
    1
  98. Who is "us"?
    1
  99. Industrial revolution started in the mid 1700s, chap. Over 200 years ago.
    1
  100. ​ @guillermoelnino Or just a troll account. You don't know anything about them or their politics, but you've decided it fits your narrative if you can place them in a convenient box. Why?
    1
  101. What about this report seems like propaganda to you?
    1
  102. Industrial revolution kicked off over 200 years ago...
    1
  103. @whatthe3131 He partnered with Samaritans Purse, its unclear how much the aid supplies came from him or were already allotted by the charity. The $1.7million is crowdfunded and I've looked but can't find anything about how much Trump personally committed. But we can agree that he's done something and that shouldn't be sniffed at. I'll concede that. But what is he doing THERE? He wasn't driving the trucks, he wasn't taking them a big cheque. What he actually did, once he got to Valdosta, was lie about the federal response and make jabs at Biden. That's political posturing and that appears to be his motivation.
    1
  104. It's not a hoax, it's scientifically supported.
    1
  105. Got any evidence?
    1