Comments by "Django" (@django3422) on "Drag queen slams anti-trans discourse, Reform UK's rise, and lies behind the culture war" video.

  1. You'd need to find an anti-trans voice that doesn't have strong links to white supremacists.
    4
  2.  @firestarter1888  Call me weird, I don't think it's good to platform white supremacists. Why, do you?
    4
  3. ​ @test-bu8sw The irony of your comment is so strong you could open a smithy with it.
    3
  4. Could you go on and actually provide some evidence for the claims?
    2
  5.  @test-bu8sw  You don't see how you're electing yourself to speak on behalf of others based on self imposed parameters by dismissing the notion of a trans of lgbqt community?
    2
  6.  @test-bu8sw  No, because... you're not getting it, are you? You don't get to decide, for the other people, that there is no community. That's the irony. You're calling someone else out for speaking on others behalf, while nominating yourself the deciding factor on whether such a community exists. It does, by the way, because people experience it. You can't speak for them.
    2
  7. Because he's a disingenuous PoS who has to create a false narrative.
    2
  8. Its not like this is the only topic this channel is covering.
    1
  9.  @firestarter1888  Democracy means governance by representation. What about that means we should platform white supremacists? And do you agree with platforming white supremacist views?
    1
  10.  @firestarter1888  That's not what a democracy means. It means you have representation in governance, that's all. By your logic, should we not make sure that child molesters are represented? No, because those voices only want to cause harm. As do supremacists. The idea of countering them with logic and fact, are you referring to debates? That doesn't work. What does work is ignoring them and not giving them air. If you think this individual has some valid points for this topic, then make those points. If they're valid and supported by evidence, they'll stand on their own.
    1
  11.  @firestarter1888  That's an absolute mess of words with no point behind it. You've given no reason why there's value in platforming the voices and views of supremacists or child molesters. I have to question why you're more concerned with such people being allowed to have their views broadcast than with trans people simply existing. Why is that?
    1
  12.  @test-bu8sw  Totally missing the point, well done. You literally said that there's no trans or lgbtq community.
    1
  13. ​ @stevejones3868 It wasn't deleted, just filtered. I can see it clearly. No, I don't know Putin and I don't need to. He's been pushing the whole false narrative conflating LGBT people with child abusers for a long time, while never presenting any evidence that supports his claims. Quite the contrary, we know that children are at far greater risk from religious figures. He's just using identity politics. No, I don't follow any BBC rhetoric. Russia has proven itself through its own actions. And "my type"? You assume a lot but clearly don't know anything.
    1