Comments by "Chef Chaudard" (@chefchaudard3580) on "T-62M vs. T-72: Really as bad?" video.

  1. 800 tanks lost, according to Oryx. Fully documented. From about 2500 the Russian had at the start of the war. Probably more lost in reality as not all of them have been documented.
    5
  2. And there are also old RPGs in the field that were useless against modern tanks and can be useful against old T-62s.
    2
  3.  @doublehelix7880  Where I live, you need to have somethng to backup your claims. Otherwise, Hitchen's razor applies: ""what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." In other words, "trust me, Bro!" is not good enough...
    2
  4.  @megalamanooblol  No. T-62M have no ERA, as far as we can see, unless it is added later, at a cost: increasing the weight will likely overload the chassis. More wear on the power train and less mobility from a tank which is already underpowered by modern standards. A T-72 stands some chances to stop an old RPG7, not a T-62.
    1
  5.  @doublehelix7880  and? Do you have any expertise yourself to backup your claim?
    1