Comments by "Chef Chaudard" (@chefchaudard3580) on "VisualPolitik EN"
channel.
-
2
-
1
-
@marcomongke3116 i understand russian mindset, but that's just paranoia.
Nobody wanted or even want to invade a nuclear power like Russia.
All what European countries want is peace.
If Russia had respected the agreement signed in Budapest, not invaded Ukraine, stayed within its borders and not intervened in neighbouring countries, europe would be at peace, doing business with russia, for the good of everybody.
But because Russia sees threats where there are none, and relies on brute force in place of negociation, thousands of people are dying, left homeless, raped, tortured...
1
-
@marcomongke3116 " doubtful about raping or torturing because some Ukrainians that are actually pro Russia..." That's referenced by Amnesty International and the UN Office of High Commissioner of Human Rights. UN investigations are ongoing.
"However, what should Russia do when US covertly arms and puts actual radicals in power..." Certainly not by invading the country.
"Also Zelensky did threaten Russia with nuclear rearmerments and was collecting nuclear materials at Chernobyl for weapons" BS. Ukraine had no mean to build bombs, enrich uranium to military grade. I found no evidence on IAEA site that Ukraine was planning that. The Russians never mentioned it, at the time, what they should have done if they knew about it.
"In Ukraine its was a legit security concern for Russia If the west just dared to question or did more research..." Thanks a lot for calling me an ignorant. What tells you that I did not do "more research"? What about you doing "more research"? If there is something to know, tell it, source it, and then I'll consider it. You'll not convince me with that "Ukrainian nuclear bomb" bullshit and the assesment that the US "puts actual radical in power" in Ukraine when President Zelenski was elected, through fair elections monitored by the EU and OSCE observers.
Again, I understand Russian mindset (the propaganda of Poutin's regime, in fact), but that's just paranoia. You still have to give evidence of the threats to Russian security that required invading another country.
1
-
@Marco Möngke If your only source of information is a Russian state owned channel, I am sorry to tell you that you live in an echo chamber.
Information coming from the same state that denied shooting down MH017 flight, even presented false proofs that an Ukrainian fighter did it, denied poisoning opponents in foreign countries despite evidence, cannot be trusted.
Furthermore, many things, like your "ukrainian nuclear bomb" make litteraly no sense, or are utter lies, like pretending that Ukrainian government was not elected.
You just keep repeating Russian propaganda.
I know the people you list: there are the same propagandists paid by the Kremlin to spread disinformation
There is free press around the world. Unlike Russia, not all media are funded by their state. And even in those that are, journalists are not under the threat to be imprisoned for 15 years if they don't say what their governement says. They are free to disagree and say it.
And I personnally read Indian press, because they have no horse in the race and are independant. And they don't follow Russian narrative. At all.
So, as you speak English, you can look for independant sources on the Internet (at least the ones that are not blocked by your government. Or maybe use some VPN?), and you'll see by yourself who is lying.
Have a nice day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1