Comments by "Chef Chaudard" (@chefchaudard3580) on "Forgotten Weapons"
channel.
-
@noecarrier5035 No, I was just in the army for military service.
Well, it was fun to shoot, but as greens (we said 'blue' in France, for historical reasons), we were not so confident.
The MAT49 is short, and, in case of a malfunction at the range, you could easily forget you had it and swing your body to call the instructor.
There was no proper safety, and shots could easily been sprayed accidently wherever we did not want.
It was pretty accurate up to 50m, when shot like Ian, not so much from the hip.
The last one looked cool, but would just have frighten the guys in front of you, as most bullets would have hit the dirt at their feet. We practiced it, but not enough to be good at it.
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
@janwitts2688 "a tank has to be able to overcome the enemy it faces...". Antitank capability on tanks was not seen as a priority before the 30s, based on the experience of WWI where tanks were used against entranched infantry only.
Most tanks designed at this time had very limited or no antitank capability, like the numerous tankettes, Pz1, French or British light tanks, etc...
In the 30s, it was recognised that tank could meet other tanks and a fight would follow. Antitank guns were designed in France (the 47SA35, followed by the 37SA38), UK (the 2 pounders), Germany (the 3,7cm PaK36, later adopted by the US) and many other countries, all fielded in the second half of the 30s.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1