Comments by "M d\x27 Ph" (@Tititateo63) on "Pro-Ukrainian Russian fighters launch multiple incursions into Russia from Ukraine" video.

  1. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    3
  2.  @_Twink  , 1. Russian regular army easily can neutralize these whatever called whoever controlled small groups of terrorists inside Russia in border area near Ukraine. 2. Russia has lot more to gain to concentrate on crushing systematicly all resistance of the Ukraine army and around in Ukraine. And in that effort is Russia very successfull rapidly destroying the ukrainian infrastructure the army so much needs. You see, in Ukraine is almost just private russian lego soldiers are fighting and not the regular russian army. Russia still has a huge stock of weapons. On the other hand Ukraine is in a desperate situation, they have already a total mobilization and because of high dead rate on the battlefied their human resources decresing very rapidly. Although the corrupt oligarch Zelensky regime has got economic support and weapons for biljons and biljons of USD and euro larger than many country has its yearly deffence budget the ukrainian army could not show any significant results of pushing out the russian troops from Ukraine. It is time for all common people to realize that Ukraine has not enough resources to win this war. Significant ukrainian success is not possible without NATO troops involved in Ukraine = WW3 with high risk of nuclear stike. 4 stars NATO generals know this. Ask yourself if you want to risk your life on the battlefield in Ukraine or you would risk your or the life of your family for Ukraine in a WW3? I don't think you would do that. Neither I would do. It is time to realize that more weapons in Ukraine = more dead without solving any problem in this conflict. It is time for seize-fire to save lives and peace talks in Ukraine!🕊
    2
  3. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    2
  4.  @juliazelenov7447  , Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    2
  5. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    2
  6. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    2
  7.  @matricci2256  , I don't think the US would dare to encourage any "ukrainian" force, any "ukrainian controlled" operation in Russia outside Ukraine because any US involvement of such operation means direct war between the US and Russia = WW3 with nuc. that should also destroy the US. US wants to get Russia weaker in a proxy war but has no gain to be directly involved in a war eith Russia. Thats is why I belive these ops are either controlled and encouraged by Ukraine without any US approval which is bad news for both the US and the world or the ops are beyond control of Ukraine and the US (worst possible scenario). No doubt that russian regulary army will absolutely destroy any attacking troops in Russia.
    1
  8.  @patrikwihlke4170  , haha, U are so naive thinking what is said in a DW report is the truth🤣. In this terrible war one thing is sure: everyone desinforms, the ukrainian side, the russians, the globalists/US/NATO/EU and their servant media like the DW. U need to grow up, pal🤣.
    1
  9. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    1
  10.  @Yukimaru0  , those 2 are the same. All weapons are delivered by NATO.
    1
  11. I don't want that kind of friendship with the US with the condition the EU and Europe sould be enemy of Russia and China. I belive in equal and mutual win-win cooperation/trade and contacts between the EU/Europe and other countries in the world.
    1
  12. This not good news for Zelensky regime: - The main priority for Ukraine should be to press back the russian troops in Ukraine. Other so called military actions show that the ukrainian army has not enough power and resources to concentrate their efforts to start and carry out an effective counteroffensive. - Regarding the so called military actions it is also a question who controls these actions - if not the ukrainian government & army that means Zelensky loosing control over Ukraine. Last but not least 4 stars NATO generals has already said many times before: it is impossible to win a war against a nucklear superpower. Ukraine has not enough resources to push out the russian troops from Ukraine although they got much more military help than a military budget for many countries for a year. Ukraine will never win over Russia in this terrible war and more weapons will only reasult more dead people. Seize fire and work for peace in Ukraine!🕊
    1
  13.  @emailtat5860  , have you ever had a mom, pal🤣🤡? Obviously, it was unnecessary that your father pulled down his trousers🤦‍♂️🤣.
    1
  14.  @davidnoelfranks1124  , the mom of Hunter Biden should be realy scared and ashamed now🤣🤦‍♂️.
    1
  15. This not good news for Zelensky regime: - The main priority for Ukraine should be to press back the russian troops in Ukraine. Other so called military actions show that the ukrainian army has not enough power and resources to concentrate their efforts to start and carry out an effective counteroffensive. - Regarding the so called military actions it is also a question who controls these actions - if not the ukrainian government & army that means Zelensky loosing control over Ukraine. Last but not least 4 stars NATO generals has already said many times before: it is impossible to win a war against a nucklear superpower. Ukraine has not enough resources to push out the russian troops from Ukraine although they got much more military help than a military budget for many countries for a year. Ukraine will never win over Russia in this terrible war and more weapons will only reasult more dead people. Seize fire and work for peace in Ukraine!🕊
    1
  16. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    1
  17. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    1
  18. Everyone should ask: - who controls this so called military op. against russian territiry otside Ukraine? - who delivers the weapons used in this op. and what origin the used weapons have? The US has declared several times for the Zelensky regime that US/NATO weapons are not ment to attack Russia outside Ukraine, that is not acceptable for the US. The US wants to avoid a direct military conflict between US/NATO and Russia. And any attacks in any military op. against Russia outside Ukraine carried out with US/NATO weapons would mean easily that looks like NATO attack on Russia in Russia = WW3 with high risk of nuclear disaster in Europe.
    1