Comments by "Arun Sar" (@arunsar7893) on "Why mosques in rear view mirror, like Kashi’s Gyanvapi, can crash India’s drive into future" video.

Just make sure you don't loose to foreign oppressors yet again while trying to reclaim your own heritage, history and civilisation.
10
And what's you idea of reconciliation?
5
Not really. Looks like you disagree with him after a long time.
5
@iforindia8509 What you are asking is to drive by looking exclusively in the rear view mirror. Everyone knows how that goes. And as for Fact Finding, it was established by the ASI that there existed a structure below the Babri Masjid. But that structure can't be definitively identified as a Mandir. The Structure was built in 12th Century and broken within 60 years of building it. Babur came 400 years later. But those fact didn't change anything. Did they?
4
@shravanraj3108 "Just for argument, if it was a fact, you would support an investigation.. right?" - Nope. Certainly not when ordered by the Court. Investigation with a purely academic intent without any political motives are a different thing.
3
@shravanraj3108 "Communists are popularly anti religion.. how can they want a Religious Sharia law to be state law" - Yes, you are right. Communists are anti-religion. Communists don't want Sharia Law. islamists want Sharia law. And Communists find Islamist of India to be their ally against the politically fighting the BJP. That's why they ally with the Islamists, which is interpreted by some as 'communists want Sharia Law in India. If BJP isn't a force they need to fight anymore then Communists and Islamists will turn on each other. Where there are no Communists or Hindutva, there are sects with Islam which fight to maximize their power. For example, in Pakistan there is an power struggle ongoing between the Barelvis, Deobandis and three other groups.
3
This is "too caught up".
2
ASI investigation established that there was a structure on which Babri Masid was built. But, It can't be definitively said that the structure was a Mandir. We all know how that went.
2
Well, ASI did investigate in case of Babri masjid as well. People ignored what ASI found and continued believing what they wanted anyway. Many still do.
2
@shravanraj3108 That there was a structure built in the 12th century. The structure was demolished with the same century, which was 400 years before Babur ever came to India. And it wasn't established that the structure was a place of worship. Read the report.
2
@shravanraj3108 "Sir, do you believe Shaivas and Vaishnavas never destroyed each others place of worship? Not even once ?" - I don't believe things for which I don't have any evidence for. So, I would say I don't know.
2
@iforindia8509 "What about Hegia Sophia ? Temple mount of Jerusalem? Anthony of Padua church of Bosnia?" - Not sure why i should care about things which aren't in my country and never were. "Nalanda university?Kashi Vishwanath ? Gurdwara Lal Khoohi? priorities
2
@aayushroy0609 Sir, I have read the ASI report. Have you?
2
@aayushroy0609 I didn't find it in the report that I read.
2
@iforindia8509 Ahh! .. So you want to be selective. Got it.
2
@iforindia8509 "Nope bro , let's start fact finding of everything! Everything means everything not to be selective on anything" - Great! .. tell me what you think of what the Marathas did with the Bengalis (after the Mughals and before the British)?
2
@rafaelchowdhury1822 What?!
2
@sumitdutta7043 Obviously. Since I have written the comment. Why did a genius like you need to point that out?
1
@gautam7472 A structure could have been anything, you moron. It needn't have been a place of worship in the first place. So, to answer your question, the investigation didn't "hint" at anything. Stop basking in the moronic glory of you dumb assumptions and borrow some brains, before you ask where people like me come from.
1
@ameo5077 So that says that every mosque must have been build on a temple right?? ... That's your logic?
1
@VivekKumar-rb7zk They will do that cause it's politically helpful. They will never talk about the British though, cause that's useless. No one will ever say, "maybe the Victorial Memorial in Kolkata was built on a Temple".
1
@ameo5077 So which were converted and which weren't?? .. Cause conversion of Babri Masjid hasn't been established even by ASI.
1
@iforindia8509 Are we also going to clear the obscurity of how Marathas raped and Killed Bengalis? or are we going to be selective in choosing what we try to get clarity on and what we leave as obscured based on whether or not it's politically useful ?
1