Youtube comments of Arun Sar (@arunsar7893).

  1. 205
  2. 171
  3. 132
  4. 109
  5. 85
  6. 76
  7. 74
  8. 70
  9. 69
  10. 67
  11. 63
  12. 62
  13. 61
  14. 59
  15. 58
  16. 44
  17. 43
  18. 41
  19. 38
  20. 38
  21. 34
  22. 34
  23. 34
  24. 31
  25. 31
  26. 29
  27. 29
  28. 29
  29. 29
  30. 28
  31. 27
  32. 27
  33. 27
  34. 26
  35. 26
  36. 25
  37. 25
  38. 25
  39. 24
  40. 23
  41. 22
  42. 22
  43. 22
  44. 22
  45. 21
  46. 21
  47. 21
  48. 21
  49. 21
  50. 21
  51. 21
  52. 21
  53. 20
  54. 20
  55. 20
  56. 20
  57. 19
  58. 19
  59. 19
  60. 19
  61. 19
  62. 18
  63. 18
  64. 18
  65. 17
  66. 17
  67. 17
  68. 17
  69. 17
  70. 17
  71. 16
  72. 16
  73. 16
  74. 15
  75. 15
  76. 15
  77. 15
  78. 15
  79. 15
  80. 15
  81. 15
  82. 15
  83. 15
  84. 15
  85. 15
  86. 14
  87. 14
  88. 14
  89. 14
  90. 14
  91. 14
  92. 14
  93. 14
  94. 14
  95. 14
  96. 14
  97. 13
  98. 13
  99. 13
  100. 13
  101. 13
  102. 13
  103. 13
  104. 13
  105. 13
  106. 13
  107. 13
  108. 13
  109. 13
  110. 12
  111. 12
  112. 12
  113. 12
  114. 12
  115. 12
  116. 12
  117. 12
  118. 12
  119. 12
  120. 12
  121. 12
  122. 12
  123. 12
  124. 12
  125. 12
  126. 12
  127. 12
  128. 11
  129. 11
  130. 11
  131. 11
  132. 11
  133. 11
  134. 11
  135. 11
  136. 11
  137. 11
  138. 11
  139. 11
  140. 11
  141. 10
  142. 10
  143.  @BharatThatIsIndia  Autocratic rule, if that is what it actually is, is a good thing for India right now. Indian Demographics is not going to wait for Indian politics to sort itself out so that economic reforms, which are necessary but are politically unfavorable, can be pushed through. A lot of much required economic reforms were stalled because of a weak MMS govt. and the 'Suit-Boot ki sarkar' jibe (which stopped land reforms). Japan, South Korea, Taiwan were all military dictatorships when they grew at high rates. They turned into democracies as the growth slowed down. China and Vietnam are communist autocracies (what happens as the growth slows down is yet to be seen). Malaysia achieved high rate of growth under 22 years of rule by Mahathir. Singapore also grew under the unchallenged and autocratic rule of Lee Kaun Yew. People often ask, why can't we grow as fast as China? .. Why are we celebrating 7% growth when China could achieve double digit growth? I find those questions really stupid. We can't cause we can't do things like China can . We can't even execute a bullet train project timely. Why?.. Because land acquisition can't happen in Maharastra cause the under-serving Uddhav Thackeray wants to be CM. The fact is there is no democracy in this world which grew at very high economic rates which being a liberal democracy that you seem to yearn for (Not even the West). People who don't know history have a very ideological view of democracy with the belief the democracy is good for all situations and even a slightest decrease or perceived decrease in democratic workings of a govt. is the biggest cause for concern. People should stop considering all other factors and only lament the loss (not complete) of democracy.
    10
  144. 10
  145. 10
  146. 10
  147. 10
  148. 10
  149. 10
  150. 10
  151. 10
  152. 10
  153. 10
  154. 10
  155. 10
  156. 10
  157. 9
  158. 9
  159. 9
  160. 9
  161. 9
  162. 9
  163. 9
  164. 9
  165. 9
  166. 9
  167. 9
  168. 9
  169. 9
  170. 9
  171. 9
  172. 9
  173. 9
  174. 9
  175. 9
  176. 9
  177. 9
  178. 9
  179. 9
  180. 9
  181. 8
  182. 8
  183. 8
  184. 8
  185. 8
  186. 8
  187. 8
  188. 8
  189. 8
  190. 8
  191. 8
  192. 8
  193. 8
  194. 8
  195. 8
  196. 8
  197. 8
  198. 8
  199. 8
  200. 8
  201. 8
  202. 8
  203. 8
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 7
  207. 7
  208. 7
  209. 7
  210. 7
  211. 7
  212. 7
  213. 7
  214. 7
  215. 7
  216. 7
  217. 7
  218. 7
  219. 7
  220. 7
  221.  @engalipak  "Syria was the after-shock of Iraq war crime. Its basic factual history. " - Syrian instability was due to the demand of the public for democracy during the Arab Spring and unlike, say in, Egypt where the dictator gave up power, Assad decided not to. You seriously need to check the sources from which you get your 'basic factual history'. " Same is being faced by Pakistan in form of destabilized Aghanistan but hope it will come out of it." - I love how your wash Pakistan of any responsibility and make it sound as if they are the victims. Pakistan was instrumental in destabilizing Afghanistan. They got paid for it too. They are just reaping what they had sown for so long. I hope they get out of it, but, sir the way you are white washing Pakistani involvement, you seem to be a England bred Mirpuri (Pakistani) Patriot. From Bradford by any chance? "Eating halal food , wearing religious clothes etc is a need and requirement for a community" - That NOT what they are demanding though. They are DEMANDING pork shouldn't be served in schools because they don't eat it. Well, how about they ask their children not to eat it while others who want to do? .. They are DEMANDING schools to remove all LGBTQ content. Can't really compare followers of Islam, a religion which wants to spread to every corner of the world and establish a Caliphate and Sharia law under which Kafurs can be killed with impunity, with other religions. It's really a special religion with special demands and needs special treatment. P.S: I am an Atheist. Not a Hindu religiously.
    7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 7
  244. 7
  245. 7
  246. 7
  247. 7
  248. 7
  249. 7
  250. 7
  251. 7
  252. 6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. 6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. 6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 6
  274.  @pratiush1000  China is doing what it's doing because there is a clear difference between India and China's hard power. The difference is structural and can't be bridged in a short period. The current behavior started after 2008 by China first stopping the process of exchanging maps in 2009 and then trouble started in 2012 and has been escalating ever since. It's going to continue to escalate unless India significantly bridges the economic gaps as well as the gaps in military modernization between India and China. That's 15 years at least, if not more. Not sure how being vocal about it on international forum makes any difference on the ground or in the perception of other countries. Pakistan has been and is still vocal against India every chance they get. What has that achieved?? .. Jacksh*t. Instead it has made it more difficult for Pakistan to make the 'Geo-economic' pivot that it so desperately needs to make. China also has a port in India's "area of influence". What difference does it make if India is vocal about it? .. Do you think the King of Bhutan would make a different statement if India protested vocally against China but couldn't make much difference on the ground? .. If anything, it's like telling your Indo-Pacific partners that you are not capable of handling trouble at your own borders. India repeatedly says relations between India and China are not normal and they can't be normal unless the border issue is solved. That's smart, imo. Rather than taking a very hard position publicly without having the capability to see it through on the ground.
    6
  275. 6
  276. 6
  277. 6
  278. 6
  279. 6
  280. 6
  281. 6
  282. 6
  283. 6
  284. 6
  285. 6
  286. 6
  287. 6
  288. 6
  289. 6
  290. 6
  291. 6
  292. 6
  293. 6
  294. 6
  295. 6
  296. 6
  297. 6
  298. 6
  299. 6
  300. 6
  301. 6
  302. 6
  303. 6
  304. 6
  305. 6
  306. 6
  307. 6
  308. 6
  309. 6
  310. 6
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 5
  326. 5
  327. 5
  328. 5
  329. 5
  330. 5
  331. 5
  332. 5
  333. 5
  334. 5
  335. 5
  336. 5
  337. 5
  338. 5
  339. 5
  340. 5
  341. 5
  342. 5
  343. 5
  344. 5
  345. 5
  346. 5
  347. 5
  348. 5
  349. 5
  350. 5
  351. 5
  352. 5
  353. 5
  354. 5
  355. 5
  356. 5
  357. 5
  358. 5
  359. 5
  360. 5
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370.  @PomegranateChocolate  "I am not from the PRC and certainly have nothing to do with CCP" - Would like to know where you are from then cause your statements clearly sound like you are a card carrying CCP member. No one else (Japanese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Burmese, Nepalese and Certainly not Indian) would say things like these: * " Sikkim was a small neighbour of China for several hundred years" * "Tibetans are fine" " It was not like the Tibetans were single out. The whole of China at that period gone through this trauma. It was a crazy period in China called the cultural revolution." - Really?? .. Tibet was annexed in 1950, sir. Full 15 years before Cultural Revolution. Off-course the logic was, it was part of China since "ancient times". * China has no desire to grab other people's land - This is the best one These are classic CCP Propaganda statements. All factually wrong. Just checking if you know about Tienanmen Square or if you think that was Western Propaganda too? "Why would the Chinese oppress Islam and Catholism? It doesn't even make sense from a Chinese perspective." - There is only one perspective that exists in China and that's the CCP's perspective. CCP does what it does cause it wants to preserve it's power. And it can't have religions which have trans-national loyalties and hence the oppression/suppression. I don't mean it in an offensive way, but you seriously lack perspective. A complete absence of perspective actually when it comes to religion and caste system. You don't get it. Another reason why I said, you don't know much about India in my previous comment. Please tell me where you are from though. That answer should be very intriguing.
    5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 4
  395. 4
  396. 4
  397. 4
  398. 4
  399. 4
  400. 4
  401. 4
  402. 4
  403. 4
  404. 4
  405. 4
  406. 4
  407. 4
  408. 4
  409. 4
  410. 4
  411. 4
  412. 4
  413.  @slashybluesy  "If you're arguing that they should be motivated to grow some other crop and the burden of paddy shifted other water rich states while keeping up with the demand. That's a fair argument." - Yes. That's my argument. " If you think no one in India needs the paddy grown there then you clearly haven't looked at the figures. 80% of the paddy grown in Punjab goes to different parts of india. So if you're arguing that the country doesn't need the paddy grown by Punjab and Haryana, that's a false argument." - That's not my argument but anyone looking at figures can easily 'figure' out that they are growing way more than the demand. It's not because of no reason that India sells rice, at a discounted rate, to China to feed it's pigs. "However, even that argument doesn't have legs as of now as many of the other states where it can potentially be moved to doesn't have the kind of storage and transport infrastructure that both these states have." - Don't you think that's a moot argument given "80% of rice they grow is transported to other states", as per you. If the states which consume it also produce it, one wouldn't need "storage and transport" at such big scale. And I can assure you there is enough capacity in other states to produce rice. It's not a coincidence that all southern states, WB, Odisha and North east Indian staple food is rice. It's because the geographical conditions are suitable for rice production. Where is the "Rice Bowl of India"? .. Hint: Not in Punjab or Haryana.
    4
  414. 4
  415. 4
  416. 4
  417. 4
  418. 4
  419. 4
  420. 4
  421. 4
  422. 4
  423. 4
  424. 4
  425. 4
  426. 4
  427. 4
  428.  @debalik8806  "it began with Light industry, moved to assembly of raw materials then slowly indigenized ALL the Sub-Components & then eventually the Raw materials as well, ultimately creating hundreds of Entire industries whose Complete chain of production lies within China." - So, it took decades for China to reach a position but India is supposed to do that from the start and unless that happens we are going to say that no manufacturing is happening in India?? .. What kind o a position is that? .. Manufacturing in any country starts with assembly. Followed by other merchants slowly shifting other parts of the supply chain to where the product is being assembled. "Not even USA dares to put sanctions on China. " - This argument is irrelevant in the discussion but I will answer it cause you have brought it up. That's because US doesn't have alternatives yet. That won't be the case very soon. A consumer(US) always has the option to diversify it's choices, but if US stops buying from China, where are they going to sell their manufactured stuff? .. US, the country which prints dollars has the upper hand here. "So Yes, China supplies 72% of India's raw materials including 80% of the Active Pharma Ingredients, the lifeline of our prized Pharmaceuticals industry. " - This is factually wrong. We only get 30% APIs from China. And that happened not because China produced APIs better or cheaper than India could. It's because India Pharma moved up the value-chain to produce formulations (something that China hasn't been able to do), where there is better margins. Indian API industry used to dominate in 2000s, before moving formulations. So, you need to understand the context before selling India short and making it sound as if Indian Pharma will be crippled if China doesn't give us APIs. "Well I am a Computer Science student so I am not an expert in Economics but I do have a close Friend who is a brilliant Economics student. I understand the basics of Economics very well & Technology " - I am someone working in tech as well and I graduated 13 years back. As far as economics is concerned I am sure Economist advising the India government have more experience than your friend. "So Argue with facts if you can Not with useless barbs." - All my arguments are fact based, always. What you need to do is to stop over glorifying China and self-deprecating India/Indians. RG talks all bullshit through and through to paint a picture as if nothing is happening. You might have been too young to remember how Congress handled the economy and how they execute. BJP wins in that respect hands down. So I could do a little less with Rahul Gandhi's bullshit. If he comes to power (which is unlikely), India can kiss it's manufacturing dream good bye.
    4
  429. 4
  430. 4
  431. 4
  432. 4
  433. 4
  434. 4
  435. 4
  436. 4
  437. 4
  438. 4
  439. 4
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442. 4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474.  @PomegranateChocolate  "Northeasterners in general, and that includes Sikkimese and Tibetans often face ethnic slurs (momos, chinkis..etc.), harassment or even beat to death just because of their appearance. " - Racial slurs are a reality of India. Every person from one part faces it when he/she goes to the other part. The only difference is that you think it's unique to the Northeasterners. "There are a lot of insurgencies operating in the northeast and they are met with brutal suppression by the Indian arm forces.The Nagas people have been fighting for their independence from day one when India was created in 1947 is just one example. " - There were insurgencies in Punjab ,Tamil Nadu and Assam as well. Each of which is Culturally linguistically, historically and religiously related to "India". Do they see "Indians" as occupiers too?? Not to mention the Maoist insurgency in the Indian heart land. Insurgency is a matter of internal security and it will and always has been brutally suppressed by any Nation State across the world. Look at what the Chinese are doing to the fellow- "mongoloid stock" in Tibet. And that was the reason why in 1962, during the Indo-China war, Northeast insurgents could declare freedom, but they didn't. You need to find out Why? Aheto Sema (recently passed away) who was once a fierce enemy joined the ranks of Indian Army.Why? I have many naga (& khasi ) friends, from many diff. tribes Ao, Angami, Sema, Lotha etc. And you present a very one-sided and selective narrative of the situation. "Bollywood is banned in many parts of the northeast while K-pop is popular there. This shows what their cultural orientation is which is no surprise." - Also, goes to show that you can be part of the Indian State and still maintain your 'cultural orientation'. Btw, k-pop is popular in many other parts of India as well, just like Anime is. It has nothing to do with "cultural orientation". " If it is not for the British had an empire in South Asia the northeast would never have been part of India." - Very likely. But then no one can really know what the Indian State would look like. Also, there is no way to say that Northeast would be independent countries.Highly likely that China would see it as a way to bypass the Malacca Strait and instead of building CPEC it would just probably occupy the Northeast, since China's best excuse to do that is "it was part of China since ancient times" and offcourse the "mongoloid stock", which you think is the most important binding factor. You Lack Perspective, my friend.
    4
  475. 4
  476. ​ @PomegranateChocolate  "The land grabbing of Tibet starts before India even exists" - Firstly, I can't respect anyone who uses terms like "before India even exists". Just goes to show you have zero clue of India's history. Indian civilization has been there for thousands of years just like the Chinese Civilization. The Indian Nation state is new, just like the Chinese Nation state is new. "the PRC and the ROC do not recognize each other, meaning as far as the PRC is concern Taiwan is part of the PRC, and as far as Taiwan is concerned mainland China is part of the ROC" - I am well aware of this " Taiwan (the Republic of China) never concedes the independence of Mongolia and vehemently condemned the annexation of South Tibet (so-called Arunachal Pradesh) by India." "You think only Communist China has a problem with India's land-grabbing of South Tibet?" Dude it doesn't matter if what RoC concedes and what it doesn't. RoC doesn't even have the mainland, do you think anyone cares what RoC claims and whether it concedes something or it doesn't?? .. You can call it "South Tibet" or whatever you like. The fact is the area is called Arunachal Pradesh, it is under Indian Control and it belongs to India legally as per the Shimla Convention signed between British India and Tibest govt. in 1914. The only land grabbing that was done was by RoC, which annexed by RoC in 1950. Now, Roc believes Tibet was still under Chinese Rule when it clearly wasn't after Xinhai Revolution in 1912, is Roc's problem. Not India's. " The land grabbing of Tibet starts before India even exists. It starts during the British Raj, a certified expansionist. " - The real land grabbing started even before that. Done by Qing dynasty (which latter lost it), another certified expansionist force. "When India came into existence it continues the footstep of the British and continues the intrusion into Chinese territories." - India inherited it's territory from British India just like RoC/PRC from the Qing Dynasty. China keeps Xinjiang (and Tibet) in it's territory and brutally suppresses their secessionist impulse even today . And just like NorthEast India is culturally, linguistically, religiously different from rest of India, same goes for Xinjiang and China. But you don't seem to have any problem with that. You dismiss it as "western propaganda". But You have a problem bcs North east India is a part of India and you go on to tell me how much they hate Indians. Do you have any idea how much the Ughyurs hate the Chinese? In this whole exercise, you are exposing yourself as the hypocrite you are.
    4
  477.  @PomegranateChocolate  "On August 15, 1947 there were still over five hundred princely states that were never part of British India." - They were all a part of British India. Each one of them. The treaty of accession that they signed was for them to legally agree to accede into the "Nation State" of India, but they were all part of British India just like NEFA. If your logic is applied (which isn't logical at all) probably more than 50% of mainland India is also "land-grabbed". Can't pay heed to such logic. "Shimla convention has no legal standing." - As per you. I keep asserting it cause according to me it does. "Those who are stuck in India with the exception of a few have a lot of resentment towards India. " - You would love to believe that CCP propaganda isn't it? .. Except I have met them in Dharmashala, where they live and they can't stop abusing the Chinese. See how they show their 'love' fr China: In India: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EL4-Ffp0z6Q But also in China: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnBkD_1N1QE "hey have relatives in China and know their relatives are doing much better in China than in India. " - You Chinese morons don't get religion and culture, do you? .Maybe cause you destroyed your own during the Cultural Revolution. Not everything is about money. " I predict in the upcoming years the exiled Tibetans in India will be a big headache for India and may trigger the cessation of the northeast from India" - We have handled much bigger headaches. We will be fine. Moreover, given your low intellect I am not very worried. "the largest third world turd on this planet earth" - A third world country on which China, even after all it's advances, can't assert it's claims. Such is the so called powerful Dragon. India's GDP and per capita GDP is exactly where China's was 15 years back. I guess that means China has only recently evolved from being a third world turd.
    4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 3
  527. 3
  528. 3
  529. 3
  530. 3
  531. 3
  532. 3
  533. 3
  534. 3
  535. 3
  536. 3
  537. 3
  538. 3
  539. 3
  540. 3
  541. 3
  542. 3
  543. 3
  544. 3
  545. 3
  546. 3
  547. 3
  548. 3
  549. 3
  550. 3
  551. 3
  552. 3
  553. 3
  554. 3
  555. 3
  556. 3
  557. 3
  558. 3
  559. 3
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615.  @786checkmate  " I didn't know the UK was in the islamic world " - Islamic world exists where ever the Ummah exists. One only has to go to East ham, London or Bardford , for example to understand what I mean by the Islamic World. "We all know they did. America is the biggest terrorist group in the world. " - "We" stands for the Ummah here, no one else. This is an example of counter-factuals that goes around in the Islamic World, while Leaders of Islamic Countries hug US Leaders to advance their interests. " And they did create, fund and train Taliban and al qaeda. " - Saying it a 100 times doesn't make it true. Taliban was created and funded by Pakistan for it's own geo-political apprehensions. Only funded by the US at a later stage. It's quiet well documented as well. The capability of Muhammads' (calling themselves "Mo") selectively reading of history to suit a narrative is astonishing. "Funny how you had to attribute my claim to the "Islamic world" - there is no such thing. Not after the West destroyed the Caliphate " - Anyone who has read Qur'an and the Hadiths would know why the Ummah yearns for the Caliphate. The Caliphate lives on in Islamist minds. That's what the ISIS was trying to do. Ummah might not like their methods, but the end goal has always been the same. To bring the whole world under an Islamic Caliphate and implementing the Sharia. "Prime example is thanks giving when they have the natives blankets infected with the smallpox disease. " - West has done many evil things. No doubt about that. But that doesn't mean everything that's wrong with Islam should be attributed to the west. For Example, What's happening in Aceh, Indonesia(which is exactly what happened in Afghanistan under Taliban) is independent of any western power's interference. I am as awake as one can be. I have a very good understanding of how 'Power' and 'ideology' work.
    3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636.  @PomegranateChocolate  "Manipur was annexed in 1949 when India forces its leader to sign the so called Article of Ascension under gun point." - Find out how Hyderabad became a part of India. More than 400 Article of Ascensions were signed but that still doesn't mean they weren't part of British India. "Tawang is the Sixth Dalai Lama's birthplace and home to a four hundred yeas old Tibetan monastery. Tawang has never been part of the British Raj." - Tawang is within McMohan Line and hence India territory. British India kept trying to assert control since 1935, after a British citizen went into Tawang and got arrested. It wasn't successful until 1951. That wasn't annexing. That was asserting control on an area which belonged to India as per Shimla Convention. For all these stories of "annexing" tibet, Dalai Lama and 100k Tibetians decided to take refuge in India. God knows why! Especially, since Chinese are such benevolent people. "At the end of 2008, a little over a decade after Britain returned Hong Kong back to China, the Tibet issue finally has no utility for Britain as a bargaining chip of Britain in dealing with China on Hong Kong, Britain finally has no stake in Tibet and can afford to be honest for once. The British government put out a statement recognizing China's sovereignty of Tibet (before it was suzerainty, not sovereignty) " - I already knew this. Not sure what makes you think change in British Govt.'s stance in 2008 should have any bearing on India's idea of sovereignty. UK has it's own interest now and can have different positions based on it's own interest. Trade with China is good, so why antagonise China, can be a very easy explanation rather than your suggestion that UK admits it cause it's true. " Indians are shameless people." - True. Only the China are God Sent and hence center of the world. "No Chinese government, whether the PRC or ROC (Taiwan) ever recognizes the so-called MacMahon line." - Means jackshit really cause that's the only thing India govt. recognises and controls the territory that it claims. "Free South Tibet (so-called Arunachal Pradesh) from India." - As soon as you Free East Turkmenstan. Until then, don't hold your breath. Or do. That's really up to you. I think we have had enough of this. This will be my last reply.Bye.
    3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685.  @__s__tatic  "When crude oil was $110, during congress time I remember we were still paying around 80 rupees and now when crude oil is around $80 people are paying around 100 rupees" - That's because Modi in his first regime Modi changed the the upper cap on the amount of tax that can be collected on oil. He didn't reduce the retail price by increasing the tax collected by the government because he understands two thing, (1) that it's easy to reduce the oil prices but increasing them is a political problem and (2) passing on the lower crude prices effectively implies subsidizing the rich (If you know even the basics of economics you would know how). So he collects the extra tax and targets it to the lower most strata of the population. This is one way he has funded the building of toilets in his first term. that is one way he gets votes. Effective delivery to the lower most strata. Ajay Maken of congress wrote an article on this. You would know this if you weren't the one getting all your info from WhatsApp and had a habit of reading books and articles. "but according to you inflation is still in check even though prices are at an all time high, this kind of logic only you can understand." - Champoo, look at the composition of CPI and WPI. There is no direct correlation between Crude Oil prices and inflation. Your simple mind is having problems comprehending logic cause you think how can inflation be low when crude prices are higher than 2010. For one, the value of 100 Rupees is lower than the value of 80 Rupees 10 years back. In today's value 80 rupees is same as 128 rupees. That's how inflation works. You are paying less than what you used to during Congress regime. Too much of free education. That's it. Not going to reply anymore. Talking to you is a waste of time.
    2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. 2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 2
  789. 2
  790. 2
  791. 2
  792. 2
  793. 2
  794. 2
  795. 2
  796. 2
  797. 2
  798. 2
  799. 2
  800. 2
  801. 2
  802. 2
  803. 2
  804. 2
  805. 2
  806. 2
  807. 2
  808. 2
  809. 2
  810. 2
  811. 2
  812. 2
  813. 2
  814. 2
  815. 2
  816. 2
  817. 2
  818. 2
  819. 2
  820. 2
  821. 2
  822. 2
  823. 2
  824. 2
  825. 2
  826. 2
  827. 2
  828. 2
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918.  @BharatThatIsIndia  "Modi ji was doing Mujra in this election and now he will do the same for Naidu and Nitish. This is the power of people in Indian democracy." - Talking about Mujra is so Congress Eco-chamber language. When Modi got majority that was the power of people in Indian democracy as well. It's just that you didn't like it. So, it was labelled as "democratic backsliding". I have rarely me such loosers in life who are happy even if they couldn't cross a 100 seats after 10 years of anti-incumbency and because Modi didn't get a majority. When did Congress last get 240 seats? .. Remind me again? Btw, both Nitish and Naidu have a lot less leverage than Congress voters think they do. They will not be able to get Home Ministry, Defense, Finance, Foreign Affairs, for sure. And it's highly unlikely that allies get Railways, Commerce, IT or Telecom. That's where bulk of the work of Modi govt is happening. Naidu will have to take centers assistance to build Amravati while serving as the CM of Andhra and planning for Nara Lokesh's succession. Nitesh can't switch sides like he always does cause, firstly chances of INDI Alliance forming govt is zero and even if they do form a govt. what will Nitesh Kumar get? .. He has 12 seats while TMC has 29, DMK has 22, SP has 37 and Congress has 99. so the Mujra will be from the otherside. "Unemployment is at record high since 2018-19" - Unemployment is a structural issue. It started going up from 2011. And that's happening cause India has not become a significant manufacturing hub like it should have. Modi govt has done more for that transition to happen than Congress could ever have. But facts rarely matter to the average Congress voters. They just parrot what their supreme leader says mindlessly.
    2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967.  @PomegranateChocolate  Dude .. You comments are getting seriously delusional and devoid of facts. "The northeast including Manipur, Tripura, Sikkim, South Tibet, Nagaland, were never part of the British Raj. It was invaded and annexed by India after the British have already left." - I don't know where you read you history from, but North East has always been a part of British Ra and was called as NEFT. Even the present day Myanmar(Burma) was a part of British Raj and was ruled under the same administration until 1937 when it was separated from British India into a separately administered colony until 1948. This idea of India "annexing" NorthEastern States after the British left is a delusion. It never happened. India, since it's independence in 1947 has always maintained and claimed territory that were inherited from British India. No less. No more. On the otherhand, RoC and PRC claim parts of British India, because they believed Tibet was part of China (which it wasn't). Infact, PRC(/RoC) was much bigger than in 1950 as compared to 1913. Add to that the claims on South China Sea and funding economically dud projects and taking them over (E.g hambantota) .So, I would say China is expansionist. "This is obviously a political hack job. Not a single Muslim country raises any concern about Xinjiang" - Not even a single Muslim Country?? .. Ever heard of Turkey? Do you know why Turkey cut the water supply to the Chinese Embassy only some days back? What's East Tukstan ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Turkestan ) ?..Find out for yourself or live in delusion calling everything a Western Propaganda. That's up to you. "That place wasn't even called AP at that time. In the later years, it was called NEFA (Northeast Frontier Agency) by the British Raj" - Yes, it was called NEFA (previously NEFT and always a part of British Raj), but not just Arunanchal Pradesh. It included Assam, Nagaland and many other states, which were separated out of NEFA and made into states later. One of the states was named Aruanchal Pradesh. None of this means it wasn't a part of British Raj. "Shimla convention has no legal standing because it was a tripartite convention (the British, Tibetan and China) and China didn't sign it. " - China didn't sign it because negotiations failed between China and Tibet, not because China had a problem with the British & Tibetan arrangement (This is documented). So, the British & Tibet signed a bilateral agreement. China now uses it to assert claims which it never had. " The so-called McMahon line is a diplomatic forgery that was added on it decades later. The real original treaty of the Shimla treaty without the McMahon line still survives in the Oxford library. " - Not really. It way more complicated than that. And the original treaty does include the McMahon line. I don't think we can agree on much of this especially if Chinese Diplomats and Indian Diplomats have failed to agree for 70 years. You can believe what you want and I will do the same. So, let's not waste each other's time. The only difference between me and you is that I accept there was insurgency(funded by China) in India and the Indian govt. brutally crushed it. You can't even bring yourself to admit what China has done to Tibetans and is doing to Ughyurs in Xinjiang. You are brushing it off as western propaganda. Anyway, this is something may want to see (though it's not specifically related to the topic): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sXE-S_pWUQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv0JT9FuEQI It was a good conversation. Good Day!
    2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009.  @bigfigher  "My understading is that most of the countries thought exactly opposite." - I think you have made that pretty clear. "Many internatioal medias even wrote 'where is indian govt'. " - Quoting international media isn't a very smart gesture. They have a habit of showing India in a bad light to divert attention from the failures of their own governments. "India's healthcare system is not that bad. States like kerala handled the situation much much better" - Kerala has a very high HDI and it's healthcare is much better than other states. But when you were talking about 'floating bodies' you were referring UP. You can't paint all over India with the same brush. But it's an undeniable fact that Indian healthcare system is much less equipped as compared to all the other countries and the their media houses you are mentioning. "why Modi did not address the country when it was going though one of the worst periods in its entire history. " - How is this a requirement? .. How would the PM addressing the country have made difference in medical handling of the situation? "On the contracy, Biristh, American, French, German, Italian leaders... all of them addressed people through media on daily basis when the they face the worst of worst." - Firstly, why compare India with countries with 25x of India's per capita GDP? .. And how does it matter if they addressed the people? .. They didn't do very well in handling the situation. I lived in UK until very recently and my sister lives in Canada. I am speaking from personal experience. Not sure why are you glorifying the activity of 'addressing people'. As if that saves lifes more than vaccinating people, which is what India did.
    2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188.  @Tup7kSh7kur  2014-19 (Term- I): 1. Implementation of GST (Congress talked about it for 15+ years, but it was finally implemented by Modi govt. cause Modi gave a revenue guarantee to states, which was a huge political risk that Congress didn't have the guts to take.) 2. Deregulation of Diesel Prices (Before this Diesel Prices weren't determined by the markets) 3. Opening Coal Mining Sector (Ended Coal India Monopoly and brought down coal mining costs) 4. IBC (Improved Bankruptcy Process and was a major help in cleaning the NPA accumulated during UPA) Execution: 1. Direct Benefit Transfer (Plugged leakages and lead to efficient delivery of social welfare) on UPI 2. Layed 1 lac+ kms of optical fibres under BharatNet Program 3. Provision of Toilets (Near 100% delivery) and Gas connection to the poorest 4. Sewage treatment and Urban Waste Treatment went from 15% to 80%+ in the last 10 years. 5. Expressways, Railways (Vande Bharat, electrification etc), Border Roads and important passes, Bhogibil Bridge and other important infra. Even BJP's opposition can't deny this. 6. Electificity provision, Nal Se jal and Awas Yojana have made great progress 7. FTA with Australia, UAE etc 2019-2024(Term-II): 1. Air India Privatisation 2. Ending Retroactive Taxation (A gift to Indian Economy from UPA. Being sarcastic here) 3. 50%+ FDI in Insurance and Defense 4. Opening Mapping to private players (Before this only Survey of India had the Authority to Map India, Google Map was technically illegal and only 15% of India is Mapped. That is changing) and Space Sector to private players (This was done immediately after Galwan Crash when Sat. images came from private companies in the west. Today we have Agnikul and Pixxel because of this reform) 6. Labour Reforms (One of the main reasons why labour intensive manufacturing doesn't happen in India) 7. Good Progress has been made on privatising Discoms. Very important for viability of power sector. 8. PM Gati shakti is an epic reform in logistics. I have mentioned reforms which were highly consequential and very difficult to implement. There are a lot of other reforms as well. Not mentioning the work that has been done in getting manufacturing into India. There is some epic work going on that will change the way MSME lending happens. This will boost economy and be a significant change.
    1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258.  @mohamedhabib8460  This is a digression from the initial discussion. But I will engage. Your believes and demands only work in an utopian idealist world, NOT practically. Also, what's with putting every responsibility on the government?? ... Why is there no talk about the responsibilities of the Citizens? .. "US and MOST of the First World provide enormous information to the Public and the Press educate the People immediately. " - They don't educate their citizens. they put out information for citizens who are "interested" to find information that's required. No government on the face of this earth has been able to "educate" their citizens to be able to support the right policy. If what you say was true, Brexit would never have happened. Or people of Germany would never have opposed nuclear power generation. India puts out enough data (less than developed nations with better resources, but enough) to support some of the most obvious policies. Interested citizens can go through it and support policies like Farm Bills, for example. Does that happen though? .. Nope. Citizens are like spoilt entitled children who believe all they will do is put a vote once every 5 years and crib rest of the time. They will not take time to understand the country's limitations. They protest when there vested interest gets harmed. In an ideal democracy like the one you are describing, Citizens are equally responsible for the democracy to function the way you want it to function. "IF this is ignored or neglected, then you pave the way for Autocracy of the type of Putin, MBS, Xi " - Life of an average citizen is better in each of those countries when compared to many "democracies". Democracy is over-rated. And the proponents of it are ideologues. They support it cause they "believe" it's better. Whether it actually is better or not, is arguable.
    1
  1259.  @mohamedhabib8460  "I guess we both belong to Totally Opposite Ends of the Spectrum of our Views of the World. Maybe, our Life Experience, Education & Perception of Life are all quite different and opposite." - I agree. "So, I refuse to engage with you further" - Should be all the more reason to engage. Just pointing out some facts: 1. "Brexit and Germany going Non-Nuclear Energy had overwhelming Public Support. Whether it is right or wrong, we don't know as yet." - Brexit didn't have overwhelming public support. The vote was very close. Germany going Non-nuclear has already been proved wrong. It resulted in Ukraine's invasion by Russia. Opinion: Just because something has overwhelming public support, doesn't mean it should be done. In India if you ask the public whether India should bomb Pakistan, I am sure there will be overwhelming public support. Doesn't mean that it should be done. Public is usually dumb. 3. "I charge that current Modi Junta does not know HOW to pass a Legislation via Committee Meetings and Public Views on the matter on hand." - We can agree on that too. For Farm bills - There was no public opinion until protests started. And there was so much of vested interest that no amount of "consultation" would result in any different result. "Now, Covid came and ravaged our Economy, even though my State Tamil Nadu posted the best economic growth of 14.8% nominal in 2021, which makes it No. 1 State in the Union on Per Capita State GDP. " - Not sure how pointing this data out had anything do to with the discussion.
    1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381.  @saif9765  "media is called the 4th pillar because it keeps a check on the power and opposition is powerless.its the govt which holds power." - Absolutely. But the business model of media is broken. It's very easy to control the media just by throwing some ad money at them. It's the same in America. " I remember how the CAG in UPA govt made false allegations regarding 2g scam which ultimately brought down the govt ." - Exactly. That's the sad truth of Indian Politics. If you actually get to understand the issue you will see that the opposition takes up banal issues and tries to change public's perception to gain power. BJP opposing FDI in Retail was bullshit. And so was the Anna movement. And more recently the Farmer's protest. All political bullshit. The point I am making is, the nature of Indian politics is such that very little gets done. India can't afford it anymore. India needs to move at a fast pasce in Economic Reforms, Defense procurment, Bureaucratic reforms etc. "And one more thing India's capital expenditure on defence has been going down in the last 5 years" - That's true. And the cost of pensions is larger than salaries of active personel. As for govt. marketing, that's what this govt. does. Ignoring all that, the question that needs to be asked " Is there an existential threat to India and it's interests?" - And the answer to that unequivocally is YES. You need to listen to the strategic community to understand how bad the situation is, especially since last year when China killed Indian soldiers. And I am not talking about short-term situation like disengagement and stuff. I am talking long term.
    1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396. 1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435. 1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462.  @ggill3866  "4) how does the free hoarding law make any sense? " - It makes absolute sense cause it's not a hoarding law at all. People should know that "hoarding" works only when it's a "Problem of Deficiency", which is what India had in 1960s before the Green revolution. Today what we have is a a "Problem of Surplus". So, just like we built dams to "store" excess water when there is a surplus supply during rainfall, so that we can use it during summer when demand of water is high, we need to do the same for agricultural produce. We need to "store" them so there is "PRICE STABILIZATION". Price stabilisation ensures the farmers get paid a viable and fixed amount and consumers get a stable price. That's why Milk has a stable price but Onions don't. They keep fluctuating from Rs 20 to Rs 200 per kg while Farmers make nothing. The use of the word "hoarding" itself is misleading. All your other arguments are also of no real concern and can be answered quiet easily. Tell me, did you know that the Contract Farming Law that Centre has brought was first brought by Punjab Govt. back in 2013?? .. All you arguments regarding concerns with the Contract Farming laws are just based on flawed understanding of the law. Also, tell me what was Punjab's water table level 10 years back V/S today? " I work at Punjab agricultural university!" - You are either being dishonest or you aren't very good at your work. I suggest you read the report that Punjab govt. produced (The Committee was lead by Montek Sigh Ahluwalia) only 1.5 years back or listen to what Sardara Singh Johl about the Farm reforms.
    1
  1463.  @ggill3866  "Take Walmart for example!! Walmart at this moment is controlling prices of half the US." - Can we not talk about the US where 2% of the population depends on agriculture (and hence can be helped with a sustainable subsidy V/S India where 55% of the population depend on Agriculture. We have a long long way before we reach the stage were Walmart in US is today. Your argument is like "Look at all the car accidents in the Foreign country. So, let's just stick to riding bullock Carts" " If private players really wanna pay more then msp" - That is not the purpose of allowing Private Mandis. It's true that no one wants to pay even the MSP. That's because MSP is a politically inflated price. It's because of MSP that farmers in Punjab keep growing Rice/Paddy even though 1 kgs of Paddy requires 7000 Ltrs of Water. Punjab's water table has gone down drastically. Anyone who lives in Punjab knows this. Punjab (Land of 5 riviers) is slowly turning into a desert like Rajasthan. The idea is to encourage farmers to produce other things like Oil Seeds and other high value produce that market demands and sell it at a price that's viable. This needs infrastructure and building these infrastructure needs private investment. Govt. can't do it alone. Finally, Punjab over a period of time has to move away from Farming itself and reform it's economy. India needs to reduce it's population involved in farming and move many of them to manufacturing and services. Punjab used to be the richest state in 2000. Today it's GDP is same as Odisha (a state with 25% tribal population). What happened?? .. Everyone moved forward. Punjab stayed back. And you are still opposing the reform.
    1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. ​ @ggill3866  "When government has clearly failed to create employment opportunities!! " - It's NOT the govt's job to create employment opportunities. Government's job is to govern. Employment comes from the private sector. "We are ready for a change where farmers can get better prices of there produce and soul health can improve too!! And that we are all ready for!" - But none of the change can happen unless these reforms are brought in. Also, don't think these reforms are Magic Pills. There is a lot of work to be done after these reforms. And there will be hiccups, it won't be a perfect sail through BUT eventually outcome will be good. "And you already accepted that these bills just throws farmers out of farming so corporates can let cheap labour!!" - Never said that. Farmers still produce. Corporates build the supply chain. That's what I said. "On the other side you accepted that farmers should go out of farming!!" - Yes. Eventually that's what they have to do. Don't forget that everyone in India was a farmer once. Two generations back even my family was into farming (many of them still are). They eventually moved out. They have to. Farm lands will be consolidated with only some farmers who can grow their produce sustainably. The current scenario where the land holdings are small is unsustainable. " In this whole conversation you didn’t even mentioned one point how these bills will help farmers!!" - My conversation started with me describing how price stabilisation is important for Farmers and how removal of ECA is required for it to happen. And I did say everything else can also be explained. But it's bit hard to do so on youtube comments.Also, did you see the link I sent you? .. That has more.
    1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571.  @engalipak  " I will use 'instrumental in liberating Afghanistan'" - I am not sure where Pakistan gets this sense that everyone wants to get liberated and it falls upon Pakistan's shoulders to liberate them. "Majority of Aghanis 90% + are happy for the part that the foreign occupations have ended " - I don't know what gives you this confidence but every Afghans I have talked to absolutely loathes Pakistan. "Pakistan is a 3rd world country, yet it hosts Millions of Aghans and have suffered without complaining too much about it. " - Well, I don't think it can complain given it 'liberated' Afghanistan and it's the reason they are there. "Yes I am a patriot, in fact need to be right now. Pakistani awam needs to be the most patriotic currently due to the issues we are in right now" - Good for you, and Pakistan! .. But I think, the kind of patriots, who carefully "choose" words to reaffirm Pakistan's delusions. Those 'magnificent delusions' have lead to the state Pakistan currently is in. A true Patriot would give Pakistan a does of reality, not ideology. "There is no precedent on the planet currently where Muslims in West are demanding to close down pubs, demolish other faith related infrastructure, force to wear modest clothing" - Sharia Patrols from East Ham, London .. Say Hi! "Almost all of them have moved past this view and feel embarrassed when they look back." - I am very matured, I have read the Qu'ran & Hadith and I have very smart people who have drawn the same conclusion as me. I would be embarrassed if I thought otherwise about Islam. I couldn't care less if friends of some random dude on internet are embarrassed or not.
    1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595.  @shaikhrayyan2998  " It seems to me that it is you who have been fooled by IT Cell of BJP" - Dude .. just because you don't understand economics and don't follow what government has been doing doesn't mean others are being "fooled by IT cell". "Explained me what economic reforms modi government did in last 10 years except digitalization( UPI) which I accept it as a huge success of Modi govt." 1 . IBC. This is what led to clearing the NPA mess created during UPA-II 2. Open Coal sector to private players 3. Ending retroactive taxation. Another Gift from UPA-II. 4. Privatisation of Air India and Public Listing of LIC 5. Major Ports Bill. Decentralisation of decision making.Google “India has quietly transformed its ports” to understand better 6. Allowing more than 50% invest investment in Insurance 7. Allowing more than 50% investment in Defense. * Why do you think India’s defense exports have been going up? * 8. Labour Law Reforms (Passed but not notified, hopefully will have this term). This i One of the reasons why India didn’t have labor-intensive manufacturing 9. Started Privatising Power Distribution Companies 10. Opened Space sector and Mapping Sector to Private companies. Google Angikul for example. There are a lot of other reforms like bilateral letting and simplifying rules for IT companies. But those are smaller ones. I am not mentioning those and also NOT mentioning what BJP has done in infrastructure development (roads, railways, Bharat net, toilets, tapped water connection, housing for the poor, improving electricity coverage etc).
    1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598.  @shaikhrayyan2998  " It seems to me that it is you who have been fooled by IT Cell of BJP" - Dude .. just because you don't understand economics and don't follow what government has been doing doesn't mean others are being "fooled by IT cell". "Explained me what economic reforms modi government did in last 10 years except digitalization( UPI) which I accept it as a huge success of Modi govt." 1 . IBC. This is what led to clearing the NPA mess created during UPA-II 2. Open Coal sector to private players 3. Ending retroactive taxation. Another Gift from UPA-II. 4. Privatisation of Air India and Public Listing of LIC 5. Major Ports Bill. Decentralisation of decision making.Google “India has quietly transformed its ports” . to understand better 6. Allowing more than 50% invest investment in Insurance 7. Allowing more than 50% investment in Defense. * Why do you think India’s defense exports have been going up? * 8. Labour Law Reforms (Passed but not notified, hopefully will have this term). This i One of the reason why India didn’t have labor intensive manufacturing 9. Started Privatising Power Distribution Companies 10. Opened Space sector and Mapping Sector to Private companies. Google Angikul for example. There are a lot of other reforms like bilateral letting and simplifying rules for IT companies. But those are smaller ones. I am not mentioning those and also NOT mentioning what BJP has done in infrastructure development (roads, railways, Bharat net, toilets, tapped water connection, housing for the poor, improving electricity coverage etc).
    1
  1599. " It seems to me that it is you who have been fooled by IT Cell of BJP" - Dude .. just because you don't understand economics and don't follow what government has been doing doesn't mean others are being "fooled by IT cell". "Explained me what economic reforms modi government did in last 10 years except digitalization( UPI) which I accept it as a huge success of Modi govt." 1 . IBC. This is what led to clearing the NPA mess created during UPA-II 2. Open Coal sector to private players 3. Ending retroactive taxation. Another Gift from UPA-II. 4. Privatisation of Air India and Public Listing of LIC 5. Major Ports Bill. Decentralisation of decision making.Google “India has quietly transformed its ports” . to understand better 6. Allowing more than 50% invest investment in Insurance 7. Allowing more than 50% investment in Defense. * Why do you think India’s defense exports have been going up? * 8. Labour Law Reforms (Passed but not notified, hopefully will have this term). This i One of the reason why India didn’t have labor intensive manufacturing 9. Started Privatising Power Distribution Companies 10. Opened Space sector and Mapping Sector to Private companies. Google Angikul for example. There are a lot of other reforms like bilateral letting and simplifying rules for IT companies. But those are smaller ones. I am not mentioning those and also NOT mentioning what BJP has done in infrastructure development (roads, railways, Bharat net, toilets, tapped water connection, housing for the poor, improving electricity coverage etc).
    1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630.  @zakirhussainkhokhar5127  " I think you dont know ur country India Well." - I know it very well, actually. You don't. If you took 2 hrs out of your preparation and read the annual budget of state and center, understood how fiscal deficits work, you wouldn't have unrealistic expectations. "Every state in India doesnt have Bengaluru and Kolkata. " - Kolkata is a sh*thole. Looks like you don't know what you are talking about. No one has stopped you from going to bangalore btw. You don't need a passport/visa to go there. Btw, there is Mumbai, Gurgaon, Pune, Hyderabad and donzens of tier-II cities like Indore, Jaipur etc with jobs as well. "I dont think there can be any comparison with the govt teacher job and a private tchr job in terms of rumenaration." - I think that's the problem. Govt. teachers get paid way more than they should. Which is why people run after those jobs. "After all u hv to get married and make arrangements for your sister's marriages too. Some hv dreams of building their Pucca house. Its not about one man earning and then sleeping. Its about running families." - Everyone has responsibilities and dreams. The Maibaap sarkar attitude isn't going to help anyone. Please answer this one question. How many jobs do you expect the govt. to provide? Btw, I am happy to help in any way I can. Let me know your qualifications, what do you do now and how much do you expect to earn. I can't help you with govt. jobs though. I wouldn't do a govt. job even if someone offered it to me on a platter.
    1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701.  @swapniln8904  " Interesting, but then why he cries 70 years , when the condition of india was bad after 1947? " - I don't know who you are talking about. But if you mean Modi, then I must say, I am not a BJP spokeperson and I can't answer why he says the things that he does. My guess would be to discredit anything and everything Congress has ever done. So, I am smart enough to know that the narrative that Congress hasn't done anything in 70 years is crap. But I don't think most Indians are. So some believe it and it makes for good politics. Similar games are played by the Congress against BJP btw. "He would had made arrangements for travelling laborers." - Yes. Very Likely. "built oxygen plant instead of 1300 crore home." - Hope you do know that Oxygen shortage is a logistics issue, not a financial one. Redirecting 1300 Crs into making "oxygen plant" (as if it can be done in a day or even a month), would have made zero difference to the accessible Oxygen supply that India has today. So, this is just an opposition narrative that doesn't hold much water as an argument, but sure does make for good politics. Since you have diverted away from just talking about Covid into talking about economy, let me address that a bit. "He would not had carried out demonetization, the most foolish move. " - I agree. Purely from the perspective of economics , It was a dumb move. " GST would had good structure" - Congress had 10 year to implement it. They kept discussing it for "good structure". My guess would be, based on historical data, Congress would have discussed it some more for another 10 years but would never have been able to implement it, whether with good or bad structure. Getting all states to agree to let go of their tax collecting ability with many of those states having opposition in power is like solving a 30-dimensional Optimization problem. I don't respect people who don't appreciate that fact and rather read a few articles and jump to the conclusion that GST could have had a "better structure". "Some good public sector companies he would had established." - That's a clear impossibility. The only companies which are good are the ones which are efficient. And no Public Sector company is efficient. Public sector companies should all be sold off irrespective of whether they are profit making or not, unless they are strategically important. Something that this govt. has dared to say. Every previous govt. did it, cause it's the right thing to do, but didn't talk about it, they said "disinvestment". "He would had not done hindu muslim hatred." - This is very likely true. They would have promoted caste divisions. Since that helps their politics. "He would not had sold airports, railways, etc to private players." - Who sold the Delhi Airport?? .. remind me again? .. More importantly it's so moronic that educated Indians talk of Airports and Railways being "sold" to private players, when what's happening is actually a revenue sharing agreement exactly like Spectrum auctions. Govt.s's recurring non-tax income increases with this. And every Airport which has been sold is run better than govt. run airports. That is a fact based by data. Manmohan Singh govt. couldn't have brought in the extremely important Farm reforms and Labour reforms. They couldn't have privatised Public Sector Banks. Another extremely necessary step. They could have brought in the Mining reforms maybe. But nothing else. So, NO. I don't think Manmohan Singh would have done better for economy, even though he is an economist himself. He didn't have the political backing needed to implement difficult reforms. Now, please don't tell me economy grew faster when MMS was PM. Anyone who knows basic economics would know there is always a lag between the reform and economics. And Indian economy has been slowing down because the credit growth had collapsed, thanks to NPAs in the banks. IBC solved that issue. Guess which govt. brought that in.
    1
  1702.  Maximum Max  "well written sir." - Thanks " india today is full of highly oversmart unwise people who simply know to question and dont have the brains to analyze the root cause of anything holistically" - And most of them are in a slumber until someone starts protesting. Then they wake up, take a min to decide which of the two parties "seems" like the victim, read a few news articles and jump to conclusions. Next thing you know is #ISupportFarmer trending everywhere. "both UPA and NDA are effectively the same" - Exactly. Just like The Republic and The Wire are the same. It's just that, one is more polished than the other. And I actively avoid The Quint and Scroll. Those are very depressing. If someone keeps reading them, as many people do, you think that the country has gone to the Dogs, especially the Economy. Little so people know that Indian Economy is all set to scale new highs. "the only parties that dont do this is the BJD, JDU, AIADMK and maybe AAP." - BJD doesn't do it cause, one, it's based around a linguistic identity and Muslims are only 2% of the state. Polarisation doesn't work. AAP doesn't do it cause in a small place like Delhi, where public is relatively better educated and financially sound, it's easy to sell the idea of good governance. As AAP expands, it's politics will change. And given that in future India is going to have a larger Urban population vs rural, AAP maybe become the party which is BJP lite and fights in Urban India. I don't know about the others. AAP's stance on Farmer's protest was hilarious. Kejriwal implements Odd-Even and encourages people to not burst crackers on Diwali to control Delhi pollution but when Reforms are brought in that would stop stubble burning, the reason behind Delhi's pollution, he opposes it with the aim to win seats in upcoming Punjab election. He is Greta Thunberg Dwitiya. In every possible sense. :-D
    1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736.  @tomchristo  "NDA hasn’t fixed the NPA crisis" - That's the craziest thing I have ever heard. IBC is what has led to fixing of NDA crisis. Demonetization was/is a bad idea implemented only because of political reasons, but it isn't a structural problem unlike NPA crisis. "unplanned implementation of GST" - Still better than no implementation. UPA kept 'planning' and discussing it for 20 f*cking years. They wanted to plan some more. "neither of which UPA would have ever done." - I agree. It would instead implement a f*cked up land acquisition bill that will haunt India for years to come. "Also, inflation was demand driven and fuel prices were high." - Fuel prices were high, yes. But inflation was high because of copious amounts of notes that were printed during the second term "Now, India is in stagflation now" - Dude.. you seriously don't any economics. Do you? .. Where are you copying these dumb statements from? "the government did not pass through any of the low fuel prices to consumers and destroyed the economy," - All the Welfare schemes under NDA were funded by these. You don't seem to know much about anything. "Yes, there were issues during UPA but none like the blunders of this current government." - This is a bullshit narrative. NDA didn't start fixing problems until sometime. but certain didn't create structural problems like UPA did. "Stop thinking only you know economics" - I never said only I know economics. I said you don't And you certainly don't. "Americans had some sense which you Indians clearly lack!" - Says a moron who thinks confirming with him is the only way one can have sense. I don't support either parties btw. I just like to call out the bullshit of Bhakts from both sides of the aisle.
    1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740.  @Cotswolds1913  " India was very divided before Britain took over." - India had been divided and unified many times before the British came to India. Mughals aren't the only example. There were empires before them that had unified India 1000 years before Mughals came. And India didn't transition from Mughals to the British. There was a 70 year rule of Maratha Empire in between. People seem to forget that. "Would India have unified in an alternate timeline with no British control?? Idk, that's really hard to answer, I'd like to think it would have" - I don't think that hypothetical question can be answered without being biased. But given the advancement in communications, it's likely that someone would have unified India. Would India have looked exactly the same as today? - Probably not. "but we I think can at least take some of the good that came out of our timeline, rather than just lament the bad." - No one is lamenting the bad. But what you are trying to do is push a cuddly narrative. It's telling an African-American, "well it's true that the British brought you to America and traded you as slaves but atleast you got democracy and a chance at achieving the American Dream. So, don't just lament the bad, appreciate that atleast some good came out of the time you were being tortured." or telling the Jews, "it's true you had to suffer the holocaust, but atleast you got a country of your own. So, don't lament the bad. Look at the bright side. Atleast appreciate that you got something good out of it." Highly insensitive and patronising.
    1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768.  @AJ-uw9oe  "The economy has been on a downwards trajectory for some years now." - The Economy has been on a downward trajectory for 6 Qtrs before Covid, but the reasons for the same was the twin balance sheet crisis and NPAs leading to fall in credit growth. The effect was seen after 2018, after having accelerated by demonetisation but the structural problems started long before that. The fact is, people who have no clue about how the economy works always point to past economic performance to come to the conclusion that the future is going to be the same or even worse. That's most Indians, btw. That's why political parties lie to their faces without them having any idea. "And no rebounding is going to happen next year." - That's just a plain stupid statement. Even with the 2nd wave, the growth for FY22 which was previously predicted to be 11% has now been revised to 9.5%. That's a rebound by every possible definition. India will be the only large economy to do that. I don't care which political party is in power or which comes to power in future. The fact is, Indian Economy is at the cusp of a multi-year growth cycle, irrespective of the power at centre. It's going to happen no matter what, the only risk being Covid (which given the second wave should be taken care of). And then if NDA comes to power they are going to claim they did it because they rectified the economy and if UPA comes to power they will claim they magically did it as soon as they came to power. Fact is, it was going to happen anyway and both are fooling the citizens. " India has still not managed to hit 10% of vaccination targets." - You seem to be in love with the past. Past isn't an indicator of the future. Doesn't matter what India has or hasn't managed to do, what matters is what India is going to do in the future. The constraint was in production and logistics, not in finance or administration of vaccines. Both those issues are almost solved. Vaccination numbers should drastically improve in the coming weeks. But there is still an uncertainty related to Covid in the future, whether or not India vaccinates all it's citizens or not.
    1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898.  @TeluguBusinessChannel  1. That has been always true at any given point in history of the republic. The more important question is do they believe their situation has improved and if not who is the person/party that they can change it for them. 2. And yet you seem to confident that, even though the survey data suggests otherwise, Congress someone how magically has a better chance than it did in 2019.How about you wait for the seat sharing arrangement and a common agenda to come out before you start drawing conclusions. 3. It's not a numerical guarantee, but statistical probability. Btw, what kind of stupidity led you to compare Punjab elections with Loksabha election?? .. Congress handed over Punjab election to AAP by propping up Sidhu to publicly challenge Captain Amarendra Singh. Do you see anyone from within BJP challenging Modi publicly?? .. Why compare the two situation? .. "Btw, when it comes to development, Congress delivered better GDP growth rate than BJP." - Firstly, when people vote, they don't do a comparative study of who had better growth rates. It's weird that one would suggest this when the argument is about elections. And if you personally believe that "better GDP growth rate" = "better development". Then I am sorry to say, but you need more education on how the economy works. I am not sure what BJP fans and Congress fans should do. But you should work on your understanding of Indian Politics and Statistics. I don't think you fully comprehend what you are talking about.
    1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927.  @gurpreetbrar7005  Dude. As long as we have public sector banks, there will always be a politician somewhere who will take x amount of money and make a phone call to the banks chairman to approve a huge loan that the bank is almost certain will go bad. That's the very definition of Crony Capitalism. So two things need to be done. 1) A few Public sector banks should be privatised. It doesn't make sense for all Public sector banks to have branches & ATMs serving all areas. That's redundancy and highly inefficient. 2) The rest of the Public sector banks should be transferred to a separate holding company so that the govt. can indirectly guide the bank for more financial inclusion but can never order it to sanction loans. Those decisions would be independent. The NPAs that are going to rise to 15% is bcs of Covid. That was expected. But the previous NPA cycle is almost coming to an end, thanks to IBC. As for Private banks, it's true that RBI has to improve it's regulation but there are two things, private banks don't deliberately make bad loan decisions and hence there is less chance of failing and there is a high chance that they consolidate into some other Banks if they make bad decisions. Just like any other business. They don't have to be repeatedly refinanced. Finally, it's ironic that you see refinancing of public sector banks using Tax Payers money as problematic and unsustainable but not the funding of MSP for select crops for only 6% of Farmers. :-) These are exact same things. I understand that you might not agree. So let's skip the last part.
    1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108.  @jmchng9662  You must be a Singaporean Chinese. Tell me if I am wrong. Much of the moronic understanding of Singaporean Chinese comes from their own political hate for Indians in Singapore. They do believe they are a superior race. It's just that they don't say it openly. They try to say it in more subtle way exactly like you are trying to do. 1) "I had more or less the same arguments with Indian posters some 20 years ago. Almost the same kinda boasts. But where India still is now.....??" - Where is India now? .. If you think India is the same as it was 20 years back then you are dumber than I thought. And just because India didn't do as well as China doesn't mean India didn't do well. It did. The demographics of India as different. India has a longer run way. 2) "This statement is not out from my own mouth nor from any Chinese media but taken from Nikkei." - I know dumbo. I said it's an Opinion Piece, not your Opinion. Why is your English Comprehension so poor?!! .. I know it's from Nikkei, which is why I I shared some links to other articles (also recent) from Nikkei as well. 3) "btw do you think China's remarkable success story is just based on export alone" - It isn't based on export alone but export is the largest component. But you do think India's economic growth has to be export oriented which is why you keep saying "foreign companies don't want to invest in India". A large portions of FDI is usually export oriented. Isn't it? .. Hope you know that! i don't think we need to waste anymore time. We can talk again in 15 years, if you will still be alive that is.
    1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. 1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323.  @DineshTwanabasu  "West is in decline man." - True. Quiet sometime before any other grouping comes even remotely close. " It has greater gdp because it prints money." - No dude.🤣I can't believe that someone. Every country's Central bank can print money. No one has stopped them. printing money leads to only one thing: Inflation. The West has the GDP that it does because of brands, innovation and knowledge produced from R&D. The West eats the lion share of value creation in every value chain. There only three OS on computers, two are owned by US companies and the third one's (Linux) enterprise edition is owned by Red Hat, again in the US. There are only two operating systems on phones, both owned by US companies. There are only two card payment facilitator that operate world wide, Visa and Mastercard, both US companies. The entire Social media (except Tiktok), advertising, search etc are all US companies. If someone wants to buy planes, there are only two companies: Airbus & Boeing, both in the west. US owns the GPS. There are tons of other examples. You don't understand what the West is and the power it wields. "once they find out alternate currency to trade with" - That isn't going to happen anytime soon. All the talks of Brics getting a new currency is also BS. If countries could ditch dollar so easily they would have. They will eventually but dollar is going to remain the dominant currency of trade for couple of decades. You might want to find out, if China is a 18T USD Economy, why do countries not have yuan as a reserve currency in any meaningful way. Sry for the long reply.But that small comment had a lot of things that needed to be answered.
    1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388.  @AnuragKumar-mn7zu  "Take for example "government exams".What does it take to make it fair and timely? Why has no government achieved it? Because these political goons are greedy, they don't want to pay salary. So many posts of judges are pending. If you are talking in mass numbers.. See how TCS,Infosys,Wipro employs and delivers result , in total they employ almost 10 lakh employees." - Why would someone compare for-profit organisations who are incentivised to be efficient with Bureaucracies which aren't? ..Btw, politicians have jackshit to do with Govt. Exams. Also, if you use the same argument to privatise PSUs, public always pushes back. "Inflation is all time high" - Which Weed are you smoking, son? .. Inflation has been 4% on an average for years now. Please don't talk about inflation in short term. that's like measuring someone's heartrate after then have run a sprint and saying the heartrate must always be 120 bpm. "We have now maximum unemployment rate in the history of this country." - Thanks to collapsing Credit growth and FRBM Act requiring to maintain a fiscal deficit percentage. But why would you care to know about that?? .. As long as you can rant and it makes to look "woke", does it really matter if you understand the problem?,, right? Can't help someone who can't see any change in India over last 20 years. Economists won't be able to stop laughing at someone like that. Don't throw-up random stats when you don't really understand how they work. "It is the lack of will of these politicians to do anything substantial. " - no. It's the inability of citizens to understand what substantial means and how it can be achieved. Ranting doesn't achieve much, that's for sure. "In Human Development Index India ranks 131 out of 200 counties. " - Make comparisons. Not absolute statements. What was India's HDI before? And India is a vast country with HDI varying drastically. "Raise your voice,ask the politicians to implement everything mentioned in their manifesto,if they can't then it should not be promised" - Congress promised the same farm reforms today that it promised in it's 2019 Manifesto and the citizens love it. What does that say about the citizens of India? ""Since last 73 years we voted for caste/religion" - Jokes on us, the citizens. Politicians are reflection of the citizenry at large. "Most of these scums are even less literate compared to a watchman." - They don't need to be educated. They are public representatives, their job is consensus building. "More than 35% of politicans have heinous crime under their belt. 70% of them have been convicted." - That's why India needs political Reforms.
    1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393.  @sreekr  Well, Firstly the comparison was with US and China in military capabilities. Whether or not Chinese citizens will have better lives and whether India will be able to provide decent health care to it's citizens wasn't the topic of discussion. About US worries, advances in software (like AI) can easily be achieved. Hardware is where research takes time. And when US says it's not ready to compete, it means in China's back yard. The South China Sea, not even the second island chain, let alone the third Island Chain. But having said that, your understanding of Economics seems patchy. You seem to believe China is going to achieve all these great things while India can't. Sure, Chinese citizens will have decent lifestyles but so will Indian Citizens. China's economy needs domestic consumption to increase to be able to sustain it's Economic growth because it's export led growth has reached its limits and is only going to reduce from here on out. Not only is it's demographic collapsing but also the current generation don't spend much cause there is no social security. So, China being able to depend on it's own economy for consumption is really doubtful. India, on the other hand, has been a consumption led economy from the very start. India's growth is more sustainable. India will keep growing much after 2050, as well, while China's growth will most likely slowdown. What is China going to do when CCP's legitimacy doesn't come from economic growth as before?.. What will China do to service the huge debt it has amassed to boost it's economy leading to creation of Ghost Cities and infra which no one uses ?? .. What if EU & US diversify out of China, what will China do with it's over capacity? These are some questions which show the problems with the Chinese Economy and it's future prospects of growth. People rarely realise India is exactly where China was 15 years back and will be exactly where China is today 15 years from now. It will take, however, take a huge political will to implement Economic reforms regularly. If the right reforms are attempted, then it's quiet likely that India will surpass China as world's largest Economy sometime in the next 30 years.
    1
  2394.  @sreekr  "Economic growth, military capabilities, standard of living are all linked." - Not necessarily. "The ability of China to deal with the pandemic and carry on with economic growth" - Dude, they have an autocratic govt. They are supposed to control the pandemic better than democracies. If they can't even do that, what's the use of centrally concentrating all the power? " india failing with the pandemic control resulting in more damages to our economy and international standing has been playing out for weeks now." - I agree. India's Economy has been damaged (structural story remains intact though) and the International standing has slide lower, but we are talking about decades, not weeks. Being myopic to look at the current situation doesn't suit well to long term strategic views. " the presence of an ever increasing number of people reflecting a country's power does not hold up now and will play a decreasing role in the future. " - Probably not. But it has benefits which an artificially controlled population doesn't. And I think you are discounting those benefits a little too much because of advances in technology. "Have been hearing of the end of China's export led growth for a decade and more. Haven't seen any signs though." - The signs are pretty clear. And have been so for quiet sometime. I am not sure how you don't see it. "Had seen videos of China's ghost cities and then also later saw the same ones after being occupied." - The current size of China's unoccupied housing capacity is 200 million. That's how many people those empty buildings can house. Which are the ones you saw getting occupied? "I am sure there are lot of issues with china and the opaque nature of it governance hiding possible ills till they burst out. But at the moment they are going strong." - These are contradictory statements though. You can their opaque nature hides possible ills they they burst out. And at the same time you are sure they are going strong. How do you even know that since they are so opaque? You seem to give A+ to China with all their problems which are much bigger in size when compared to India. You seem to be convinced Chinese Economy will keep growing and Chinese will have better social infrastructure cause they will be able to afford it. And somehow China will be able to do it but India won't. You are overestimating the China, both wrt to India and US alike.
    1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1