Comments by "Daniel Bradford" (@Falconlibrary) on "GBNews"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1.4 million Americans identify as transgendered. That's .00424%, or a less than one-half of one percent. Women are 53% of the population. Why do 53% of the population have subordinate rights to a group whose entire population could fit in the city of Dallas, Texas?
I'm glad to see that the Brits are resisting this madness, which has resulted in the US destroying women's sports by allowing "transwomen" (i.e., biological males who claim to be females) to "compete" in sports, winning all or most of the matches.
I'd heard terrible things about JK Rowling, but all second-hand, so I decided to investigate for myself.
I agreed with almost everything Rowling wrote on this issue. Rowling isn't a bigot, she's an advocate for protecting women's rights in our society.
I don't have a daughter, but I do have nieces. I don't want them in a changing room with "women" who have penises, nor do I want them competing in sports with "women" who have penises or the XY chromosome, even if they've had "reassignment" surgery. There is NO surgery that can change the chromosomal makeup of human being, and that's what determines sex.
XX = female
XY = male
Biology has spoken and it cannot be refuted.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is actually smart marketing strategy by Nike, Bud Light, Kate Spade, et al.
Let me explain!
66% of people 18-29 strongly support the trans movement. The more affluent someone is, the more likely they are to support it.
The 18-29 demographic is coveted, as we all know. Establish loyalty to a brand when people are that age, and you've got them for life.
By supporting the trans movement (or pretending to), these companies are establishing and/or reinforcing loyalty to their brand among young people.
Ex: "I support the trans movement and so does Nike, so I can support trans people by buying Nike."
That's how "socially conscious" advertising works. It's why so many big companies donated millions to Black Lives Matter.
The people who oppose the trans movement's push for special rights--older folks, conservatives, etc--are NOT a coveted demographic and if you buy their products, it will actually DIMINISH their brand among the 66% of young people who are "woke" and "pro-trans".
In America, always, always, always FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Does it all make sense now why these companies are pushing the trans movement on us? It's a cynical attempt to exploit support for trans people so they can make more money.
(I think it's horrible, but I also know people in advertising, and this is how they think. They're all basically Don Draper.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Was Roald Dahl, rabid anti-Semite, on the list?
No. Guess old Roald should've just written brilliant children's books and kept his big mouth shut about his political views.
There's a novel by the infamously misogynistic writer VS Naipaul, though. I guess writers of color get pass on problematic views.
But nothing for Rowling, who wrote seven out of the twenty best-selling novels, ever. Rowling is like a one-woman literary Beatles. But she crossed the trans activists (a tiny minority) and besides, she's white, anyway.
Nothing for Dame Agatha Christie, either, who had the bad luck to be born white and English.
Nothing for JRR Tolkien, either. White, English, and male. Bad combination, mate.
Here's the good news: 100 years from now, no one will remember these writers' critics, but we will still be reading their books.
Creating something immortal is the best revenge, don't you think?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1