Comments by "Daniel Bradford" (@Falconlibrary) on "'Cowards': Teacher who survived Uvalde shooting slams police response, will 'never forgive them'" video.

@mikedimaria5460 Yes, this is what happens when you vote for liberals and take prayer out of the schools. That gunman was almost certainly an atheist and a liberal.
111
Officer safety comes first! You sound like you wanted those cops to risk THEIR lives. For what? None of those kids even pay taxes.
3
That teacher should've been armed with latest military-grade weaponry. The kids should've been strapped, too. A 4th grader is big enough to handle a firearm.
2
@tamfx2138 You keep talking about just arming the teachers. The kids should be armed, too. The teacher plus those 11 4th graders = 12 people shooting back at the gunman. Eliminate recess and replace it with firing range practice, every day. Eliminate free lunch and replace it with free bullets.
2
@jolo4036 Both the teachers and kids in that school needed to be armed! ALL teachers and students should carry loaded weapons at all times during the school day. Schools should also have lethal boobytraps in the hallways and entrances that will blow up any intruders.
1
Hey, that was a dangerous situation. We can't expect cops to risk their lives and safety by confronting armed suspects. The guy was bound to run out of ammo sooner or later. The cops would've been smart to just wait him out. Ok, so a lot more kids would've been killed, maybe dozens more, but officer safety comes first.
1
@davidtester1458 I AGREE AND WE SHOULD ARM THE KIDS TOO! 4TH GRADERS CAN HANDLE A SMALL PISTOL AND THEY CAN PRACTICE TARGET SHOOTING AT RECESS!
1
Cops shouldn't be expected to risk their lives to protect citizens. That's not their job. Their job is to arrest people only when it's absolutely safe for them to do so. Police should never have to confront an armed suspect. The cops could get hurt that way!
1
@tamfx2138 Absolutely the teachers and students should be armed. Well, maybe not the kindergarteners, but if you're old enough to be in first grade, you're old enough to pack heat. I'll bet those seven year olds can shoot really well if they're given a chance but these bleeding heart liberals are afraid to let the kids exercise their Second Amendment rights to be armed with lethal weapons. Maybe the gun manufacturers can come out with a special lightweight design just for kids under the age of 12. The schools should also be booby-trapped with anti-personnel mines and tiger pits. The first thing the Communists did in Russia and China was to take guns away from schoolkids! Maybe seal the schools and release a knockout gas during these mass shooter events. This will all cost money, of course, but we can just eliminate do-nothing programs like free school lunch and cut people's Medicaid and Social Security to pay for it.
1
@gordsruby5963 The police were waiting for the gunman to surrender. What else were they supposed to do? If they went into that building, they might get shot or killed. Police officers didn't sign up for that. No police officer should ever be expected to risk his life or his safety for the sake of some kids whose parents should've armed them and equipped them with military-grade body armor if they wanted them to live through the school day. Really, this is the fault of atheistic liberals who've driven our Lord Jesus out of the public schools. If we brought back prayer into schools, no more mass shootings, guaranteed.
1
@spikethespacecowboy We should be able to buy them, though. I need an automatic machine gun to shoot the squirrels that keep raiding my bird feeder. It's an infringement of my Second Amendment right to have ANY kind of firearm I want.
1