Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Pamela Anderson Explains Paris Riots" video.

  1. The tax will be passed down to the consumer.
    1
  2.  @agnostinosatomon7023  if PETA takes a moral stance, which they do, then betraying the morals makes it worse...
    1
  3.  @agnostinosatomon7023  this is your brain in utilitarianism. They take the moral stance that almost any human activity that involves animals is wrong but they value their lives enough to use animal products/animal-tested products to save their own lives. Despite of the fact that their moral stance is being against animal testing even if it saved lives. They're garbage people who make a living out of being insufferable, hypocrite assholes while convincing you and thousands of other useful idiots that they're morally superior. If you were dying they'd deny you the life-saving cure while administering it to themselves because their lives are valuable enough to kill animals. Yours isn't.
    1
  4.  @agnostinosatomon7023  "Mary Beth Sweetland needs because of her Diabetes" - she could have either died for her beliefs or stepped down and taken the L by admitting her life is more important. "Are you morally superior, because you don't rape women ? Or do you rape them, since you are a sexist and women have to submit under your "natural" dominion ?" - that went from 0 to 100 real quick "Would it be o.K. for you to test pharmaceuticals on, let's say darker skinned people or Jews in order to save your pale skinned live one day, since you are a member of a superior race and other races have to succumb to white skinned rulership ?" - that's dumb. The testing should either reflect the general population, or if the medicine is supposed to help me later down the line I'd rather it got tested on a white majority group to make sure there isn't a weird genetic difference that makes the treatment safe for other ethnic groups but dangerous to whites. "Cannibalism, human sacrifices, slavery, opression of women, abuse of children...these actions were all widely accepted and welcomed by different societies in previous times and still are in some places." - and you make the same mistake of assuming that the future will validate your beliefs. "Pigs, cows and lambs are o.k., but Labrador and chimpansee is not o.k. to eat...THAT's pure hypocrisy, based on cultural habits, nothing more." - not really. Dogs and humans share a symbiotic companionship, I can actually use a dog to hunt other animals. There is no logical reason to eat a dog except in extreme starvation. The chimpanzee I would think it's actually dangerous to consume because we share enough DNA for diseases to easily jump across species. Wasn't AIDS spread to humans due to people hunting chimps? I understand there are cultural reasons to not eat dogs but there are logical ones as well.
    1