Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "After Kherson, Where Will Ukraine Go Next?" video.

@dreamadventure8220 This was also said about Kharkiv and Kherson. Maybe stop saying it if you're pro-Russia. You might be jinxing it.
14
Just in time for the Kerch bridge reopening.
2
@markdowding5737 But we didn't. We laid the terms for peacekeeping forces to enter the country and Milosevic started nitpicking as a delay tactic to continue the genocide. And what do you know, Russia was part of the peacekeeper force. Years later Kosovo declared independence. Crimea was seized by the Russian military. Crimea didn't leave Ukraine, Russia sent their armed forces to take over.
2
The other way around, buddy. It's Russia who has a bullet lodged in the heart and still swinging a knife like crazy. Ukraine will receive a Marshall plan to rebuild. Russia will get nothing.
2
@bahadir7677 It's "easy" being a separatist when Mother Russia is handing out money and equipment like candy. Try being a separatist when all Russia has are cheap airsoft vests and rusty AKs.
1
@bahadir7677 Whatever. They're free to take Russia's offer of passports and go live in their motherland. They don't want to be governed by Ukraine, maybe they shouldn't live on Ukrainian land that Russia stole. Or, they just just get mad for 5 minutes, touch grass, and leave peacefully because letting water go under the bridge is preferable than trying to hitch your wagon to the losing side. Russia started the war, got humiliated, and you want to live under them? That's masochist. "Its military" lmao it's Russian military, not Crimean military. They'll cross the Kerch strait. You really think a Crimean military force would have the supply lines to fight for itself after Russia calls it quits?
1
Ukraine could push Russia to the Kamchata peninsula and you'd still do this.
1
That's why he's buying from Iran.
1
@spacextsl7446 The US isn't running out of weapons, they buy whatever is good enough. Russia running out of their stuff and resorting to Iran is pathetic.
1
@command_unit7792 The Soviet Union is not Russia. Russia doesn't have he demographics for a 10 million man army. Or the economy.
1
@Jay...777 Kiev was of no use. Snake Island was of no use. Moskva was of no use. Kharkiv was of no use. Kherson was of no use. Getting kind of repetitive.
1
The railway had two empty trains roll at 5 km/h for the cameras. Same was done with Antonovsky bridge. It's all cope.
1
@MaN2Mega The train tracks were bent and the bridge span was sagging due to the heat. The bomb didn't destroy the train tracks - the massive fires did.
1
No government justifies the war. The Ukrainian people do. They want revenge and their land back. You can dislike the war all you want, you will not stop them from fighting. The German government, with all due respect, does not have to choose because they have no choice in the matter. It's not their fight. If they want to cut support and indirectly kill Ukrainians by financing Putin's war, that's on their conscience. But Ukraine will still win.
1
Apparently Russians are abandoning positions in the Eastern side and Ukraine is doing crossings on the south.
1
Ukraine isn't bombing "outgroups" they're fighting foreign invaders. The separatists in 2014 were Russians and FSB agents.
1
You look at the Russians out of fuel and asking for directions, the trenches dug in Chernobyl, the cages welded on top of tanks, the 1.5 million missing winter uniforms and the rusty AKs and tell me this was planned.
1
They'd have to race the Poles or else they get there first.
1
Except that the loss of Kharkiv will reduce them to 2014 borders at the very least in the Donbas, and they may lose Crimea. If not, at least the water access. So Russia threw it all away for nothing.
1
That's fine. Ukraine doesn't have to cross the narrow corridor until all the meat is tenderized with HIMARS. It's not easy to defend territory when all your stuff blows up every day.
1
Light vehicles can cross it, there's a single lane still open.
1
Lay off the krokodil.
1
Kosovo isn't the 51st state. Why doesn't Serbia ask for Croatia and Bosnia too? What's so special about Kosovo, an autonomous region in Yugoslavia, that they can't demand independence?
1
@markdowding5737 It's not a violation of international law, genocide is a recognized valid reason for unilateral declaration of independence. That's exactly why Russia tried to use the genocide excuse. They know what they're doing. A cheap copy of things that have happened before. The bombing of Serbia was a response to a blatant violation of human rights, and also justifiable because Serbs have a history of taking peacekeeping forces hostage to continue their genocides. There were peacekeepers in the Balkans to preventing the conflict from escalating was reasonable. There would be no bigger military confrontations. Russia was there because it was an internationally agreed upon peacekeeping mission. Don't try to deny it, even Russia participated so don't try to come up with excuses. Russia started a conflict in Donbas. Serbia started a conflict in Kosovo. How is this hypocritical? Yes, Russia tries to do cheap copies of what the West has done. But they are purely cynical about it. They know they're lying and know we know they're lying. But we have to remain respectful and diplomatic even if the face of such evils.
1
@Tugela60 They have boats. And they received an extra 40 boats through the foreign aid program.
1
BS. FSB goon Igor Girkin and the little green men took over Crimea and oversaw a phoney referendum. There was repression of dissident voices like the Crimean Tatars.
1
Historically they also suffered severe upset losses.
1
@christopherduke2477 BS. Not only is the Russian economy collapsing, the dissident right was pro-Russia from the start. Neocons are pro-Ukraine. Mind that Milley also said he'd warn China if the US was about to attack. I cannot imagine why he would ever admit that.
1
@circle7673 So Britain robbed but not Russia?
1