Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Garand Thumb"
channel.
-
99
-
64
-
58
-
47
-
46
-
40
-
33
-
30
-
28
-
24
-
21
-
21
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ImNoBSING "I do not mean you are far left." - Then what? Why does the far left matter?
"I mean the service is in that good popularity" - Then it doesn't need to be mandatory.
"The mindset is that if you do not care to put effort for your country's security, you do not deserve it either." - Okay. Does Finland allow for a person to provide for their own security?
"once you get out of school and start working, it is quite hard to detach from that life. Being mandatory, it opens up for more people." - Sounds like an excuse to me.
"But you do understand that training everybody to use a gun" - Using a gun is something that needs to be continuously trained.
"basic tactics will make the country quite hard to conquer in the long run?" - Basic tactics will get you killed. Want to make the country hard to conquer? Train the populace to be terrorists. Make the enemy soldier suffer 20 casualties per day from suicide, like the Americans in the Middle East. Make them bleed a trillion dollars. You use basic tactics against an army, you get cut down by mortars and machine gun fire quick.
"Also, do you think paid mercenaries would stick around when the real war against a large country like Russia was coming?" - You think Russia doesn't have the manpower to push through conscripts in a conventional battle? All a conventional battle would do is delay the advance until the Americans arrive.
"If you mix today's peacekeeping with neo-colonizing, you are little lost" - No, you are. It's all moneyed interest. Aid and peacekeeping is leverage.
"They are just killing crazy fundamentalists, doing good." - Doing good? The wars have never been good. If killing fundamentalists worked then how come the Middle East is a mess? Why does killing them only create more? You say your country sends troops to keep them fresh, to test gear and tactics. You have money, they have nothing. You have pipes, they walk miles for fresh water. Sending people to war for sport, to "test" them. And say it doesn't matter that you're killing because the people you kill are wrong. Are you sure you're not the fundamentalist?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jlucmonag5712 Grads are manually aimed, take time to set up, they rock like a boat when firing so the rockets land wherever, and take 20 minutes to reload. Not to mention that the HIMARS has double the range.
In the time it takes to stop a BM-21 and start the process to aim it at the intended target, an HIMARS can just drive to a position, stop, fire, and move out. The rocket pods also take 5 minutes to reload. Given an infinite supply of rockets, a single HIMARS could destroy an infinite amount of Grads by simply staying out of range, firing, and moving. It would only have to stop due to maintenance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@HaloDude557 No, your comments are irrelevant. You're understanding the process backwards. It's the state that has to prove you committed a crime. If you shoot someone who was a threat to your life on a state that doesn't have duty to retreat, what crime have you committed? Start from there. If you're going by "need", you're trying to engage in a process where people are guilty until proven innocent. If we're going by "need", most times you don't "need" to resist against an assailant. Imagine if you had to prove that an armed assailant attacking you was a threat... Imagine if the state could say that a gun to your head doesn't prove you were going to die. How can I make it more clear to you that if we go by your logic, most self-defense would be deemed illegal?
You're doing the same thing as anti-gunners. Why do you need a gun? That's the backwards way of looking at it. It's not you who has to justify why you "need" a gun. You have a legal right to own them. Start from there. Otherwise it would be like in some countries, where to prove that you're in danger of being assassinated to justify getting a carry license, you need to have an attempt on your life first. Obviously this doesn't help if you die on the first try.
Driving away, unless you have a bullet-resistant headrest, can end up with a bullet in the base of your skull. You don't know what "circumstantial" is so don't use five dollar words to wow me.
"Fear of bodily injury or dead needs to be reasonable and justified" - Typically an assailant with a weapon does that for you already.
"Being scared someone might shoot you in the back at 200 yards" - Not even a Tesla can launch that fast, and I don't have a Tesla. You really gonna argue a car can do 200 yards from a standstill in the quarter second it takes to pull a trigger?
"through a vehicle body moving 60+ mph" - Your car does 0-60 in a quarter second? You could get in contact with the Guinness World Records.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NostalgicLink Are you gonna pay for those better fences? We're not talking about the perimeter of your average white picket fence suburban home. We're talking large swaths of land.
"don't create environments where "pests" naturally thrive" - Oh so stop farming altogether? Sure bud. But the food doesn't come from the grocery store.
"Do you also shoot dogs and cats who roam from house to house and produce litter after litter every spring because the neighbors take pity and leave shitty kibbles out for them?" - Dogs and cats have a symbiotic relationship with humans, I feel embarrassed that I have to be explain 6th grade biology to people on youtube comments. There's a big fucking difference between domestic and wild animals and the types of nuisances they cause, a cat isn't going to ruin crops. Also, we control the population of pets by neutering them.
"Or, does your cognitive dissonance tell you dogs and cats shouldn't be shot, but hogs are fine?" - You don't even know what cognitive dissonance means, you're using it incorrectly. Also, for it to be cognitive dissonance cats/dogs would have to be comparable to hogs. They're not. As mentioned above, animals can form pairings that are mutually beneficial that get ingrained into their biology. You can't have a wolf as a pet like you would a dog. We don't share the long history of bonding and selective pressure we do with the dog. Dogs can read human emotion and communication better than chimpanzees or bonobos. There is a factual, objective and scientific difference between a dog and a wild animal like hog. There's also no benefits to killing dogs for food or to protect livestock/crops. If anything, we use dogs to protect our livestock.
"Hell, by your thinking, why not start taking out the homeless? The homeless stain otherwise nice locations and laws aren't strict enough to keep them out." - Do you have an actual point or you simply argue from bad faith?
1
-
@NostalgicLink "I'm fully aware of the amount of land being used primarily to feed animals being taken advantage of around the world. And, yes, I'm solely going to pay to fix the situation, since that's what you're trying to insinuate I aught to do." - Stop being a child. Fences are expensive. You're demanding of others to pay for something you're not willing to contribute to. Either stop making unreasonable demands or pay up.
"Yeah, I definitely said we should just stop farming altogether. You're an idiot." - Yeah, you said that humans can't create environments that attract the hogs. This means no farming, bucko.
"Cats might not be able to ruin crops, but they can cause problems. I had to lay down anti-cat spikes in my small garden to keep them from digging up the soil and chewing up leaves to clean their teeth." - I'm gonna pretend I didn't just read the implication that the damage caused to your garden by cats is as serious as the damage caused to crops by hogs.
"Every now and then he tries to round up the females to have them neutered, but more show up every year anyway" - The fact that you can do that to cats only drives my point further home. Hogs will straight up gore you.
"You believe cats and dogs have the right to live even when they can be pests, likely because of your relationship or understanding of the normality of the relationship, but not all other animals, even though all other animals are trying to live just the same as cats and dogs." - Yes, this is called basic biology. Is the shark disgusting because it doesn't kill the remora?
"I do know what cognitive dissonance is, I am using it correctly" - You're not. Cognitive dissonance requires a state of dissonance. If someone is confident about their beliefs without suffering the stress of trying to balance them, they do not suffer from cognitive dissonance.
"Cats and dogs are comparable to hogs, in many ways." - Two things being "comparable" doesn't make them equivalent.
"Notably, as I've described, they're all animals that are just trying to live" - So is a mosquito. If you want to remove the "animal" qualifier even black mold is just trying to live. Even things that aren't technically alive, like viruses, are "trying to live" by holding onto hosts and replicating their genetic information. A criminal breaking into my home is an animal trying to live. It's not an excuse.
"You're okay with killing one but not the other, despite their similar desires to not die." - See example above. Oh no, the mosquito doesn't want to die. Fuck him. He's gonna die because his bite is inconvenient to me and also they spread diseases in some countries. Even a rapist has the desire not to die. The desire to not die is not an excuse. At one point actions have to have consequences and the culprit can't say "noooo you can't harm me because I wish to not die".
"You're also okay with killing hogs as they are a nuisance, but not the homeless." - The homeless aren't out there absolutely targeting our food supply nor are they multiplying because of their invasive nature you sick fuck. If a homeless guy tries to jump you with a knife then sure, it would be wise to defend yourself.
"Have you attempted to bond with a hog? Have their been studies attempting to do so?" - How about you try first and nobody steps in to help you if it goes wrong?
"Have humans historically attempted that? No, they did so with cats and dogs" - BUDDY DO YOU KNOW WHERE DOMESTICATED PIGS COME FROM?
I MEAN I WAS ONLY HALF JOKING WHEN I SAID YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND BIOLOGY BUT YOU REALLY OUT HERE ADMITTING YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THAT DOMESTICATED PIGS WERE BRED OUT OF WILD BOAR 10,000 YEARS AGO
"There are plenty of people who take pigs as pets though. Why's that?" - Because they were bred for it, and are not wild animals? What you're doing is like saying wolves are suitable pets because dogs exist.
"When a homeless guy does nothing but bother you for change every time you go to the store, offering you nothing in return but his gratitude, do you think "he's not as useful as a cat or a dog, so why don't we just eliminate him?" No, you don't, because you were shaped to know that would be wrong, and you should know that it's similarly wrong to just eliminate hogs." - And also because there's a big fucking difference between giving up a dollar once a week and entire farms getting wrecked? Even the health concerns with dirty needles or human excrement in cities due to homelessness isn't as big of a deal as wild pigs being a vector for swine flu or possibly carrying pathogens that can wipe out deer populations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1