Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Michael Bloomberg and the Imperious Presidency" video.

@sarjim4381 dude, what? In what way is Trump libertarian? This isn't a purity test, just calling it like it is.
6
@MyplayLists4Y2Y "that is a "conflation logical fallacy" as well as a "faulty cause" propaganda technique." - No, it's hypocrisy. "Stop and Frisk was started under the Guiliana administration, then ramped up under Bloomberg to address violent gun crimes in NYC (which it succeeded in doing)" - Bullshit. Violent crime has been decreasing across the country, you can't claim Stop and Frisk did anything. Also, it's a violation of constitutional rights. "Just pathetic : /" - pathetic is the person literally shilling for an authoritarian like Bloomberg. A few centuries ago Patriots knew how to deal with people like him. And his supporters too.
5
@sarjim4381 "Reining in regulations, getting us out of bad trade deals, starting get NATO countries to pay their share" - All of that isn't libertarian exclusive. Any neo-con worth his salt will reign in regulations and libertarians want the end of NATO. Fuck forcing others to pay more. If Europe is so afraid of Russia they might as well start issuing guns to every adult and claim the EU will have a rifleman behind every blade of grass. "appointing judges who may stop federal overreach" - Kavanaugh was pro-PATRIOT Act. "not getting us into new wars" - I'm sorry but that is a weak excuse. The tremendous cost of war is what has prevented the start of new ones. Meanwhile a libertarian president should be ENDING them. There's US special forces in Africa and the US is supporting the Saudi war on Yemen. Just because no country can afford for formally declare war on the US for the acts of aggression it commits doesn't mean Trump is libertarian. "and let's not pretend Gary Johnson was any kind of libertarian" - Which nobody did so far. Pointing to Gary Johnson's bad example of a LP candidate doesn't absolve Trump of simply being a neo-con.
4