Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. Just saying, but if a bad guy sees the gun and fears it, you'd be in more trouble for shooting a person in the back than admitting you didn't use the gun. >If you show your weapon and do not use it. You will be hammered, confiscation and loss of your right to posses arms. Can the possibility of collateral damage be a suitable defense?
    1
  2. >I am unsure exactly what your question about collateral damage being a suitable defense? "You drew a gun and didn't use it, you will be hammered, your guns confiscated and lose your right to own firearms" Defense: "I saw someone running in the back" The process is obviously oversimplified, but if prosecution tries to get someone for brandishing isn't what you just said a suitable defense?
    1
  3. Guns are not defensive weapons? Then the police only exists to attack? Guns only serve to impose fear and intimidate? Then the job of the police is to oppress us? If what he said couldn't be used against gun owners, we'd see a Occupy proportions crowd trying to get him out of his job.
    1