Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "This is how the Russian SU-57 Will Fight the F-16 in Ukraine" video.

  1. ​​ @rajaydon1893 they use Ka-52s because the Vikhr missile outranges MANPADS by a few miles. This is a problem because we have MANPADS and missile defenses like the Patriot, but not something like the Buk. Which is why they're trying to mate the RIM-7 Sea Sparrow to Ukrainian Buks.
    5
  2.  @jaythomas3224  There's footage of HIMARS from this week and the last. You haven't heard because you only check out Russian sources. But the videos are out.
    5
  3. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp did you see the picture of the S-400 command vehicle struck by HIMARS? Bloody handprint on the door. The 100,000 tungsten BBs did a number on the crew inside.
    3
  4. Lmao can we see them? They also claimed to have donated 200 T-90s to the DPR/LPR.
    2
  5. There's 170 F-22s in flying condition. There's 14 Su-57s and half are prototypes.
    2
  6. The F-15EX is decades ahead of the Su-57.
    2
  7. Half the missiles fired at Ukrainian airfields missed, check the satellite photos.
    1
  8. The MiG-31 is a better launch platform. Better speed and better radar. The R-37M performance would be wasted on a Felon. Like shooting a Phoenix missile from a Fokker triplane instead of a F-14.
    1
  9. The Su-57 is a prototype, end of discussion.
    1
  10. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp  Russians bragged about killing Bradleys before they were in Ukraine.
    1
  11. ​ @themuckler8176  They desperately need it. A stealth aircraft would grant them.air superiority.
    1
  12. ​ @julienckjm7430  Those were MiG-31s which have a much more powerful radar.
    1
  13.  @julienckjm7430  Not sure why my comment didn't post. Radar is bound by physics. Bigger radar and bigger engines (power) means better detection and tracking. Faster speeds means better missile performance. The Su-57 can't cheat physics. So no, you can't tell the radar isn't less.
    1
  14. ​ @honzo1078  Earth isn't flat. The S-400 range is for targets flying up high like airliners. The curvature of the Earth hides aircraft.
    1
  15. Source on that claim? If Russia is so confident they could show the radar track.
    1
  16. The F-16 went into Iraq and Serbia. And Israeli did Operation Opera with F-16s.
    1
  17. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp  F-35s didn't cost 1.7 trillion, you're spreading fake news.
    1
  18. Russian pilots have less hours per year than what is considered the limit to be proficient.
    1
  19. ​ @classicgalactica5879  The Phantom scored like 90 kills out if 100 by missile.
    1
  20.  @sg4250  Why was a Su-35 in Italy?
    1
  21.  @pogo1140  But that's not true. Phantoms on MIGCAP were trading 3:1 at the start of the war. The 1:1 ratio includes ALL fixed wing aircraft. So obviously the side that was flying bombers and strike aircraft was losing to defensive fighters. Aircraft that couldn't shoot back or were heavily limited in the ability to shoot back sandbagged the ratio.
    1
  22. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp  Can we see them?
    1
  23. S-500 is a nuclear missile intercept system. Not something to shoot down airplanes with.
    1
  24.  @dieseldog5779  The only anti-aircraft missiles in the S-500 are the same as the missiles on the S-300 and S-400. The only differing tech in the S-500 is the ability to track and shoot anti-ballistic missiles.
    1
  25. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp What comes out of your mouth? I agree.
    1
  26. ​ @robertholbert3564  Seems like a bet he knew nobody would take. An unauthorized combat maneuver in regulated airspace would revoke the pilot licenses of the men/women involved. Do you think aircraft are like a Fast & Furious movie where anyone can challenge each other for a race and a geek changes the street lights to clear an avenue? Even planned stunts have resulted in crashes that killed the attendance at air shows. You think air combat is something that you can just do and not get in trouble with the law?
    1
  27. ​ @klardfarkus3891  They did. That's why they retreated from Kiev, then Kherson. They started with massive offensives from multiple directions to spending 9 months to take a single town. Sounds like they ran out of supplies to fight like they used to.
    1
  28. ​ @rdsox09  Forget the sources. Just name a video here on youtube showing more than 15 Su-57s in the same place at once. If they have 74, surely they have done an "elephant walk" in a runway.
    1
  29.  @rdsox09  Youtube isn't a source, it's a video hosting website. Anyone can film the aircraft. Where are they?
    1
  30. Burning game changers? Like the HIMARS buckbroke your army and forced you to resort to prisoner batallions and meat waves?
    1
  31.  @jaythomas3224  You can't jam INS. And yes, I heard of HIMARS. In fact, seen it. The videos are unmistakable, the 100,000 tungsten BBs create a cone of destruction that is awe inspiring.
    1
  32. But the MiG-31 is the better platform for it.
    1
  33.  @RighteousUncle  And you realize that there's this thing called "anti-radiation missiles" which lock onto air defenses, right? Of course there's no 1v1s. That's precisely why F-22s win. A flight of Su-57s can get jumped by a superior number of F-22s.
    1
  34. LMAO INSURGENCIES DO NOT HAVE RADARS Against insurgencies the US used A-10s and Apaches, not F-22s.
    1
  35. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp  then how come Russia can't defeat Soviet technology in Ukraine?
    1
  36. Outdated MiGs survived the Russian air defense.
    1
  37. ​ @DennisMerwood-xk8wp The Russian S-400 operators really got it. And by "it" I mean the 100,000 tungsten BBs from a HIMARS strike. Their bodies must have looked like ground beef.
    1
  38. Maneuverability looks like in videogames and movies, but in real life most pilots get shot down without knowing a missile was coming.
    1
  39.  @DennisMerwood-xk8wp  A flop that has 140 produced per year (there's 14 Su-57s, only 16 built and two crashed). It already flew missions against territory defended by Russian S-400s and Iran by Israel.
    1
  40. The real airborne sniper is the MiG-31. That one has the radar, missiles and speed. The Su-57 doesn't.
    1
  41.  @mikeyplayzwrld  Why is it? The MiG-31 has the bigger radar and bigger engines (more electric power) and since it goes faster it can sling the missile further. Russian missiles get better range performance when fired from a MiG-31 than a Su-57.
    1
  42. Difficult to reach with MANPADS, perfect launch platform for AGM-88 HARMs which seek the S-300 radar.
    1
  43. Please volunteer for the Russian army.
    1
  44. Yes. Already happened in Iraq. The F-15s with the improved IFF got the authorization to take a BVR shot without AWACS.
    1