Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Can Iran Stop U.S. Bunker Buster Bombs?" video.

  1. ​ @lillyanneserrelio2187 Cancer unfortunately is our cells going rogue. It's not like polio where you can just gain immunity from a medical preparation, it's like a computer bug in your code and you can never know where it's going to show up.
    8
  2. ​​​@mirroredvoid8394 no conventional weapon even reached the megaton range. How would you drop a bomb equivalent to a million tons of TNT? Even the FOAB was an estimated 44 tons of TNT.
    4
  3. ​ @anfrex3342 the US wrote the book on how to suppress enemy air defenses (then threw it at Iraq to great effect), and the use of a satellite weapon is a one and done. The retaliation attack on the satellite will be too late to mitigate the damage done.
    2
  4. Steel jacket is a thing: mild steel jacket with copper wash is common in Eastern states. Obviously the steel is very soft and the rifling does get worn out noticeably faster. Does not aid in penetration, it's merely a cost saving measure.
    2
  5. ​ @docfarl The bombs aren't dropped nose to tail. A few seconds of separation would allow them to not be affected.
    2
  6. Go tell that to Ukraine lol Seems like the best defense is having the will to fight, good allies and modern weapons systems.
    1
  7. You give peace a chance, I'll give you covering fire when it doesn't work out.
    1
  8. I mean Iran did attack US bases in Iraq.
    1
  9. Drill bits shatter if you look at them wrong, I don't think an air drop would fare better than careful pilot holing, lubrication and centering humans do while drilling stuff in the shop.
    1
  10. If you want peace prepare for war. It only takes a good look at eastern Europe today to see the cost of downplaying the existence of aggressors.
    1
  11. Bunkers are several tons of concrete walls and floors with a lot of volume inside. Consider that at least half the heat will escape through the hole on the ground you just punched. Even if you have enough fuel, at least at some point the people inside would find the heat spot on the wall or roof, and use fire extinguishing systems to cool that spot which would buy them time for the fuel to be consumed.
    1
  12. Some analysts seem to think their drone designs are subcontracted to Chinese engineering firms.
    1
  13. Small drones would run out of battery before they'd run out of canned food and water inside.
    1
  14. Israel "got inside" their bunker with a USB pen.
    1
  15.  @someboi4535  Not a power plant. An enrichment facility inside a bunker. Almost 30 feet underground, with a concrete shield over the concrete bunker itself. The place is covered in anti air defenses like a military base.
    1
  16.  @someboi4535  Nuclear plants are usually referred to as such because they're "POWER plants". Stuxnet did not attack a power plant, but an enrichment facility. The virus was meant to disturb the RPMs on industrial controllers to cause centrifuges to damage themselves. Centrifuges don't belong on nuclear plants, just enrichment facilities.
    1
  17.  @someboi4535  But they're not power plants. This argument is beyond useless, the point is that the Israelis bypassed the military defenses and structure hardening by attacking the computers themselves with malicious software. Doesn't generate power, it's not a power plant. By that logic an oil refinery is car engine.
    1
  18. Anti-anti-air systems have existed for decades. Missiles that seek anti air defenses have been in common use since Vietnam.
    1