Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "New US Policy Helps Russia Destroy Ukraine" video.

  1. ​ @Capt_Wupass  so if any country had intel on 9/11 they should ignore it?
    13
  2. ​ @philipz7996  just guessing the name behind the keyboard, as a joke. Ivan is a common name so it's funny. But Sergei is a good guess too
    6
  3. Are you missing the point? Sharing intel isn't a burden. The UK has US built Rivet Joints, will they have to stop providing intel because Trump got his fee fees hurt? Is that it? If a single nut or bolt is Made in USA you'll cry and whine about the labor you're forced to perform for others?
    4
  4. He literally offered to resign, ffs
    3
  5. You asked Ukraine to give up the nukes in exchange for security guarantees? Not your war? Then give Zelensky US nukes to restore the arsenal they gave up.
    2
  6. So the cruelty is the point. How are you different from the people sent to Gitmo or Abu Ghraib?
    2
  7. ​ @RealZekeShoots  the state was governing from Moscow. Just so you know who to blame. Kinda weird you'd bring up the Holodomor and not want to go after the state that caused it.
    2
  8. Long term will be more war. Rusdia re-invaded Chechnya despite two treaties. Russia agreed to respect Ukrainian sovereingty in 1994. Russia agreed to a ceasefire in Minsk I and immediately invaded Debaltseve. Long term, Russia will invade again.
    2
  9. How does the fighting end without guarantees?
    2
  10. You have no counter arguments, just insults.
    2
  11. He didn't cancel elections. The Ukrainian constitution forbids him from forcing elections.
    1
  12. That was Reagan who said it, and he was quoting a proverb. Reagan would have decked Trump.
    1
  13. Is Iran and North Korea not prolonging the war? How come Russia can get weapons instead of stopping when they run out, but not Ukraine?
    1
  14. Wrong. There was no deal. And Bucha cancelled the talks.
    1
  15. ​ @qwertyqart  Wrong. Putin said this goes back to the year 882.
    1
  16. There will be no end to the conflict without security guarantees. Russia will break the treaty before the ink dries. It happened in Minsk I. Russia invaded Debaltseve right after signging a ceasefire.
    1
  17. The same Victoria Nuland who wanted to keep Yanukovich in power as it was US State Dept strategy to keep Ukraine stable and appease Russia?
    1
  18. The fallacy is that the neighboring city forced that town to be located there. The US forced this situation by ensuring Russia kept their nukes while Ukraine had to give up theirs. Ukrainians cannot physically remove their landmass and take it somewhere not close to Russia, so they have an existencial threat next door and the US promised them to back them. The US forced that town to stand in the flood plain. The US knew the flood came after Georgia, Moldova, etc before.
    1
  19. This is 300 year old beef Russia has against Ukraine. The US didn't even exist.
    1
  20. Wrong. The peace talks as usual are Russia's stalling tactics. Russia has broken every peace treaty so far.
    1
  21. They aren't losing. Russia is using donkeys ffs.
    1
  22. Actual bot behavior
    1
  23. ​ @nooneking3959  Ukraine already shredded through a professional and a private army. Ukraine already won militarily but Putin keeps sending lemmings forward.
    1
  24. ​ @THERECOVERY90  Putin himself said on the Tucker interview it wasn't about NATO.
    1
  25. ​ @fredymader1750  their hopes and dreams are to make money in Ukraine Fortunately, most never see the money.
    1
  26. He was absolutely willing, but there's no guarantees. Last time a ceasefire was signed, Russia kept shooting.
    1
  27. "Not a warmonger" literally the guy who promised fire and fury
    1
  28. Israel voted due to US pressure.
    1
  29. If Russia wasn't getting North Korean and Iranian aid they'd have folded too.
    1
  30. ​ @jonathanleblanc9034  it was the mini sub Russia has, their ship with a submersible was in the area of the pipeline attacks
    1