Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Australia Bans Trolling u0026 The US Wants to Ban Online Scalping" video.

  1. 6
  2. 5
  3.  @RmFrZQ  If you check the UK Health Security Agency weekly report, for example I'm using week 42, in page 20 it shows a graph showing antibodies over time. Most of the population got S antibodies from infection and and vaccination. But the proportion of people getting N antibodies has stalled. This means that people who were infected after "immunization" (lol) mounted an immune response based on spike protein antibodies alone. The immune system was primed to respond to the spike proteins and now doesn't respond to the nucleoprotein. There's no other explanation. The rising prevalence of N antibodies is probably coming from the unvaccinated and the "true" vaccine failures where the person didn't mount an immune response to the shot, but most of the population now has an incomplete immune response even if they get exposed to the real thing after the shot. The spike protein is also a mutable part of the virus so it's always a gamble if old spikes prime the body for new variants. A good article is "Could live attenuated vaccines better control COVID-19?" by Shinya Okamura and Hirotaka Ebina, PMCID: PMC8354792/PMID: 34426024 Notice how the live attenuated shot is praised for the potential for broad immune response, but in trials in Syrian hamsters they had less virus in the lungs but the same amount in the nasal cavity. This means the immune system can prevent illness, but doesn't defeat the virus in the nose. People can stop being sick, but they'll keep hosting and spreading. And what happens when this creates a variant that evades our immunity?
    4
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1