Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters" channel.

  1. 135
  2. 66
  3. 59
  4. 48
  5. 41
  6. 32
  7. 31
  8. 28
  9. 27
  10. 24
  11. 23
  12. 22
  13. 21
  14. 20
  15. 17
  16. 16
  17. 15
  18. 15
  19. 15
  20. 15
  21. 15
  22. 15
  23. 14
  24. 14
  25. 13
  26. 13
  27. 13
  28. 13
  29. 12
  30. 11
  31. 11
  32. 11
  33. 11
  34. 10
  35. 10
  36. 10
  37. 10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 10
  41. 10
  42. 10
  43. 10
  44. 10
  45. 10
  46. 10
  47. 9
  48. 9
  49. 9
  50. 9
  51. 9
  52. 9
  53. 9
  54. 9
  55. 8
  56. 8
  57. 8
  58. 8
  59. 8
  60. 8
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 7
  68. 7
  69. 7
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 6
  76. 6
  77. 6
  78. 6
  79. 6
  80. 6
  81. 6
  82. 6
  83. 6
  84. 6
  85. 6
  86. 6
  87. 6
  88. 6
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 5
  105. 5
  106. 5
  107. 5
  108. 5
  109. 5
  110. 5
  111. 5
  112. 5
  113. 5
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. 5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. 4
  130. 4
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180.  @kokofan50  The best and brightest office clerks? The problem with a "secret base" is that you can't run a base with just spooks. You need people who spend their day at the desk typing whatever on the computer and taking photocopies, run the mess hall, etc. There's probably contractors who fix the AC and the roofs. I don't even know if in these bases the office floors get swept by privates or if cleaning is contracted out too. So right there you have a ton of personnel who are just 20 year olds who have no background in cloak and dagger stuff other than "don't use military computers to torrent stuff or the Russians will hack us". Now let's face it, the intelligence people are probably just looking at drone footage all day and not being secret squirrel spies either. The problem was not geolocation (as they had reasons to keep phones on) but how the bases were exposed through an unforseen effect. The fitness app creating user heatmaps and the people on the base running alongside the building walls created a near perfect outline exposing the base layout. That's it. If you wanted to know where the base was, you'd have looked into a catalog of blurred/blacked out locations on satellite imagery. Done, you geolocated the base by knowing where you're not allowed to look, no need for bad phone opsec. The embarassment here was that the base layout and activity was exposed. If they had instead ran alongside the inside perimeter of the base, we'd have learned nothing new except knowing which base had more runners.
    3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528.  @jaydy71  But it doesn't. All those "responsibilities" relate to things that were never your freedoms in the first place. Nobody ever had freedom to harm others. It doesn't even make sense. You bought the narrative, hook line and sinker. You've already internalized that you gave up freedom and that it's reasonable to give it up. That's just word trickery, you never gave up freedoms by not hurting others. "Now it means getting vaccinated to help protect you from doing harrm" 1. You're not doing harm by not being unvaccinated. There's a multitude of contagious diseases for which there are no vaccines and we don't hold anyone responsible for spreading them unless they are caught intentionally spreading it. 2. The vaccine does not prevent you from spreading. By your own twisted logic, you're still causing harm even vaccinated. Never leave the house again if you're really committed to this moral standard. "It's not a big ask" - Yes, it is. "And again he wasn't arguing in favor of government enforcement" - Pretty sure government enforces red lights. If you're saying "screw your freedoms" this means government enforcement. Stop excusing him. How can someone be screwed out of his freedoms without government enforcement? If it's still up to personal choice, why is he bringing up traffic laws? If he's saying we shouldn't have freedoms, is this the "it's voluntary until the voluntary phase is over"? Yes, apparently it is hard to get people to understand what's being said. If he's on the side of freedom and personal choice, then he completely bugled it up by saying the exact opposite of what he meant to say.
    1
  529.  @jaydy71  "This stuff isn't even controversial anymore" - And again, if you're blowing smoke in people's faces, even before we get to the health effects it's a nuisance. You have the choice not to smoke, and we used to have smoking/non smoking areas. Exhaling pathogens is part of human function. They got in when you took your first breath and they'll still be coming out the day you take your last. Breathing is not a nuisance unless I'm doing it right in your face. Hurling 1-2 ton vehicles at other people at considerable speeds is not the same as breathing. Or eating at a restaurant. Or going to a show. Or travelling to another country. "if there's a group of people large enough unwilling to take responsibility with vaccination" - WHAT RESPONSABILITY? You can still get it and transmit! Your own experts, your science has admitted it won't stop transmission. "vaccines are the best bet" - How? They don't do what they were supposed to. "they do reduce transmission as viral loads reduce much more quickly in infected vaccinated people"- COPE. Transmission is still possible. "It's just unclear to what degree exactly it reduces transmission in the delta variant specifically" - It's spreading in Israel despite high vaccination rates. It didn't work. Better luck next time. Can't wait for big pharma to make another 60 billion in revenue from the next year's revised formula. "Especially for people that can't get vaccinated." - THEY CAN STILL GET IT FROM THOSE WHO GOT VACCINATED. COME ON. THINK. "There's of course the alternative to simply accept Corona viruses as a new fact of life and hope for the best" - Oh, you better. Name a coronavirus with animal reservoirs we've managed to eradicate. Remember, the generic code shows it was hosted by bats and possibly pangolins. "then my response would also be "screw your freedoms, dickhead"" - Exactly. And you can be mad about it for the rest of your life. "I think that was clearly the crux of the governator's rant there" - The thing is that if you meet me in the elevator you're just some guy. Not a propagandist spreading an anti-freedom message from his mansion while we are under the thumb of a sanitary dictatorship. "But I guess his marriage infidelity years ago is somehow relevant to these guys" - It's always relevant when a man with questionable character starts to make character judgements.
    1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553.  @davoodoo8042  1. Georgia isn't demilitarized. 2. I'm failing to show what? The will to join a mutual defense agreement is based on protection. What is there to demonstrate? Being invaded is precisely how a country becomes fearful and considers the need for stronger protections. There's no speculation. Based on nothing? Someone who has their house broken into will invest in security. Period. You want the robber to threaten victims to not get new locks? Nonsense. 3. Ukraine cut themselves off from Crimea after it was seized by the Russian military, and a referendum asked the population if they wanted independence according to the 1992 constitution or be part of Russia. Independence would lead them to be a failed state so they were essentially coerced. There's also evidence of widespread fraud. I don't see what the point of bringing this up is. Severing one's limb is terrible. But if you have to do it to save yourself after that limb got crushed, it's understandable. You're being extremely one-sided by picking apart everything Ukraine did, and refusing to acknowledge Russian wrongdoings. Want to check the facts? How about the facts regarding the forced displacements during the Soviet times, which were meant to stop an Ukrainian identity from becoming counter-revolutionary? Purposeful ethnic displacement was a tool of the Soviets that has now been used by the Russian Federation. All this conflict is based on Soviets using Russian people to undermine Ukrainian people in the past, now being taken advantage by post-Soviet governments to go back on their recognition of Ukraine's borders.
    1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597.  @chrisb4009  You're trying to force a distinction between the issues. You can't do that. It's not how it works. You can't pick and choose. You get the bad with the good. Do they work? Inconclusive at best. Mask mandates do not typically have a rating requirement and people either use reusable cloth masks or use disposable surgical masks incorrectly. Spread does not correlate to introduction of mask mandates or compliancy rates so even if you bring up studies that say they work (and ignore the ones that say it doesn't) it's impossible to see those studies translated to actual results in the real world. So in the end, the definition of "working" is compromised by the intended use-case. Regarding your second point, you're trying to dodge your own premises. By your own account, the mask is only effective at suppressing spread from symptomatic cases, and even then a cough or a sneeze will create a positive pressure area that will push the mask away from one's face unless they're using a higher grade of PPE, which almost nobody does. Forcing asymptomatic people to be wearing a mask that only works against symptoms they don't have is the equivalent of of forcing everyone to wear a diaper even when they don't have diarrhea. The incubation period? Your own argument is that masks reduce spread in the post-incubation phase. We started with masks and now we have police using live rounds against protesters in the Netherlands. Do not come here and talk about small impositions. They all stack on top of one another. Asymptomatic spread is not a driver of cases. We've known this for about a year. Can you please stop pretending it's March 2020? It's really tiring.
    1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889.  @ts757arse  Suicide rates are pretty consistent across a lot of the big western countries. Like I said I read the POST's own report on it and they admitted it wouldn't work so it was never introduced into the process. I'm not judging from the armchair, I simply looked up the facts and turns out the UK's own government laid it out pretty well. The vast majority of people don't know anything. What does it matter if they're quite happy? I mean, why are you on this channel anyway? If things are fine the way they are, why is there a podcast dedicated to complaining about the state of the UK? How is it obvious in the stats? If you plot gun ownership and gun homicide by country there's no correlation. I don't agree with the way America does it either, so you're just strawmanning. America is wrong too. No, it's not different, it's just wrong. The whole point behind Britain's gun control was 1920s fears about WWII veterans staging a coup that mirrored the Russian revolution. It's just a sign your government hates you and wants you weak. I don't care about the uproar or legalizing anything. I'm just exposing your rationalizations. If it was about target shooting you wouldn't need a gun, you can shoot targets through other means. It's about the gun, but you can't admit it to yourself. I didn't say I wanted you to shut up about UK laws, I wanted you to get off my case about what kinds of weapons you want to brag about. You people always assume you're talking to people who think guns are banned and love going on and on about all the guns you can have. I always find it amusing when people mention .50 BMG as if the number of people with those rifles isn't miniscule and the number of ranges that authorize that kind of shooting is high enough to matter. I'm not American. If you were done with nonsense you wouldn't get a loicense lmao.
    1
  890. 1
  891.  @elias_xp95  It's not cherry picking. Australian gun crime was already on the downward trend since the late 60s. Japan never had much gun crime. Most of Europe passed gun control as a way to collect taxes or a response to situations like danger of revolution because the gun crime was never a big of a deal. This is like giving a drug to someone whose cancer is already in remission and claiming your drug cures cancer. No, I'm not American. The problem with your argument is that by that logic, crime should be higher outside of Chicago. The fact that it isn't proves it's not the guns, it's the society. Society outside of Chicago is peaceful and has no problems with guns despite having open access to them. But most regulation does stop law abiding citizens. It's a cultural engineering tool that discourages most law abiding citizens from even attempting to go through the process, and make those who do look like weirdos in the eyes of society. Not to mention that most countries with regulation do have some kind of ban in place, so your argument makes no sense. Like in some countries people have .38 Super or 9x21mm handguns because they can't own 9x19mm. By your own logic the restrictions would make sure no bans are needed, but they put nonsensical bans in place anyway. You ask for one you need to take the combo deal. You don't get to demand only rational regulations. In the US gun crime is punished, I don't even know what you mean with that line of reasoning that gun control is necessary to punish criminals.
    1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976.  @samething9376  I didn't say you said that. I simply asked you to apply the same logic. You're concern trolling about casualties, because you see the defender as having the moral responsibility to limit them, even though it's the aggressor who's firing the shells. There would have been ZERO war casualties had Putin not called for the invasion. It is a lot. Please think. The Russian Federation is losing a lot of valuable equipment and men. Even though these losses may seem sustainable, this "special military operation" is costing them men at rates seen in total wars. The munitions and fuel being spent are also depleting their stock. 10k dead and wounded in two weeks means 100k dead and wounded in two weeks versus a more capable adversary. The no-fly zone wouldn't do anything. There's essentially no middle-road here. The damage has been done. The only options are either instant capitulation or fight until defeat. The half-measure of giving up now will not bring back the dead. It will not rebuild Ukraine. Many of course want to return, but there will be nothing but exposed concrete and rubble waiting for them. You think surrender will make things get better, but they won't for several years. The homes, the roads, the bridges, the jobs won't be there. People will be refugees in their own country. And you're asking of them to just accept that. Roll over. The fact that the outcome is the same only reinforces the point - if the country is a wreck either way, might as well ask Russia to pay with the blood of their young men and the aluminum and steel of their war machines. The outcome will be the same for Ukraine. But it won't be the same for Russia. You're asking for Russia to get away scot free.
    1
  977.  @samething9376  Oh yes, the usual "no solution" cope. Bad bosses love it, the workers can't call out bad decisions that everyone knows are bad, because they're not aware of better alternatives. Let's just drive off a cliff because nobody knows which way the destination is! Want to limit casualties? Russia stops attacking. Simple as. Surrender? Who said surrender? It's you who's denying the solution now! The murderer gets away scot free! The solution is easy, and you're actively supporting more strikes! The mask comes off, you have been concern trolling about casualties all along, like I predicted. The negotiations failed because Russia is demanding Ukraine to stop being a country. They turned it into rubble, and want to make sure it can't resist invasion again. The robber steals from your house. Then demands you can't change the lock or install an alarm. Yes, it's the home owner's fault this deal can't be made. It's out of the question to have peace? Oh, so Ukraine gets beaten into a bloody pulp, but can't even leave this fight humiliated and shake hands. It needs to submit even further. Out of the question, you say. Defeat isn't enough for you. I mean, Putin... You're clearly making excuses for the aggressor and pretending you want him to stop, while actively saying it's impossible to stop. It's not impossible, that's what China did after they invaded Vietnam in 1979. Their losses were unsustainable so they declared victory, said they had caused enough punitive damage and left. That's not fanfic. That's not universal world peace. It's the real world.
    1
  978.  @samething9376  And you are waaaaay to emotionally attached to Putin's idea of might makes right. I gave plenty of retorts. I didn't say they "should" stop, I said they have the ability to stop this at any time. You blame the victim and refuse to blame the aggressor. "Well Ukraine should just stop existing" genius why didn't anyone think of that? Come on Ukrainians, just be Russia. You're saying Putin won't stop if you ask nicely, but then claim Ukraine's only option is to... ask Putin to stop. You defeated your own argument. You're admitting that surrender will not erase Ukraine's troubles. He will not stop by asking nicely. You're the one promoting the kumbaya fantasy that Russia will simply stop having an interest in a subjugated Ukraine. I'm promoting the harsh reality that Ukraine will only achieve satisfactory conditions by forcing Russia to pay in blood. This is not kumbaya. This is speaking the only language that you "might makes right" fools understand. The more power you give to force, the more you practically beg for force to be used against you. You asked for these rules. Now we will play by them. You think the victim should stop by asking nicely. Instead the victim focuses of making you bleed. Bad guys are bad. Which mean good guys should make them pay. In blood. Or else they won't stop. Bad guys won't stop being bad. They stop. When their heart stops. You are ignorant of what "concern trolling" is. I didn't call you a "troll". You don't understand what terms mean, that's fine, we're not born with all the knowledge. But learn. You have no complaint here. Your fanfic is that bad people will stop when asked nicely. You make the case that Russia won't stop, then say the solution is asking them for a timeout. All I'm saying is if Russia won't stop, Russia must bleed until it learns the lesson. You say might makes right and everyone else should cower, but you cower at the use of might and say that instead Russia should just be allowed to march into Kiev for a victory parade. You're the one writing the fanfic where the bad guy stops, even though your entire argument is based on bad people not being bad.
    1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983.  @limabravo6065  First of all, the F-22 is an air-breathing engine aircraft. Not a rocket. At the altitude the balloons were, the F-22 would be pushing through the service ceiling. For controlled flight you need thrust and lift. When you fly through thin air you lose lift which forces you to fly faster, but thinner air has less oxygen to burn with the fuel, so you lose power. Hitting the bits does nothing. Hitting the solar panel wouldn't do anything to a balloon that would still be carried by the wind. A refund on the plane for what? You're using an argument from incredulity, which is not a real argument. It's a fallacy. I don't care if you don't believe in the physics of flight. The aircraft doesn't exist to please your cartoonish fantasies of what fighter aircraft do. There's no such thing as cheap bullets in air combat. Your pilot cost more than a million bucks to train, and the aircraft costs several Gs per hour to run. And you're trying to save money by using the cannon? The debris fly off and your 220 million dollar aircraft ingests the bits through the intakes, busting the engines and forcing the pilot to ditch the aircraft. Suddenly those cheap bullets became seriously expensive. The cargo plane does orbits and shoots at the ground. Gravity helps. The Japanese had trouble shooting down B-29 Superfortresses and made heavy fighters with cannons angled upward so that they didn't have to climb as much. Still didn't work. To fire a cannon at an air target, especially when fighting gravity, you need to be within a few thousand feet. If you got more questions I can lecture you on air combat all day.
    1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1