Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Balloons, Aliens u0026 Psyops" video.

English language sightings happen mostly in the English speaking country with 330 million people? If you search in other languages you find their sightings.
3
It's IR imaging. That stuff is meant to spot tanks from 20 miles away. A tank can look like sh*t and you still know it's a tank. You put a laser spot on it and drop the payload to make it stop existing.
1
 @DarknessProphet Do you carry a satellite with you every day? Cameras in phones are tiny.
1
@denofpigs2575 And from miles away, you see the outline of a tank. They teach you to identify tanks from their blurry outlines. Basically any object you haven't seen before is difficult to identify in FLIR.
1
The problem is, we haven't even put Man beyond the Moon yet and we've already put lots of thought on how to survive landings in places like Mars. You can't just discover FTL travel prior to taking a few laps around your own planet's orbit.
1
Canada tried to down a balloon witu guns a few decades ago, they shot a thousand rounds and the thing still crossed the Atlantic ocean leaking helium.
1
@limabravo6065 First of all, the F-22 is an air-breathing engine aircraft. Not a rocket. At the altitude the balloons were, the F-22 would be pushing through the service ceiling. For controlled flight you need thrust and lift. When you fly through thin air you lose lift which forces you to fly faster, but thinner air has less oxygen to burn with the fuel, so you lose power. Hitting the bits does nothing. Hitting the solar panel wouldn't do anything to a balloon that would still be carried by the wind. A refund on the plane for what? You're using an argument from incredulity, which is not a real argument. It's a fallacy. I don't care if you don't believe in the physics of flight. The aircraft doesn't exist to please your cartoonish fantasies of what fighter aircraft do. There's no such thing as cheap bullets in air combat. Your pilot cost more than a million bucks to train, and the aircraft costs several Gs per hour to run. And you're trying to save money by using the cannon? The debris fly off and your 220 million dollar aircraft ingests the bits through the intakes, busting the engines and forcing the pilot to ditch the aircraft. Suddenly those cheap bullets became seriously expensive. The cargo plane does orbits and shoots at the ground. Gravity helps. The Japanese had trouble shooting down B-29 Superfortresses and made heavy fighters with cannons angled upward so that they didn't have to climb as much. Still didn't work. To fire a cannon at an air target, especially when fighting gravity, you need to be within a few thousand feet. If you got more questions I can lecture you on air combat all day.
1