Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Vlod the Impaler!" video.

  1.  @vladimirzakrevski3157  their commander literally has the two lightning runes the SS used tattooed near his neck.
    5
  2. Hold on. Russia could also do that. Are we finally admitting "might makes right"?
    3
  3. I was also explained why we needed to invade Iraq. I wasn't convinced then, and I was a child.
    2
  4. Give Putin what he asks and one day there will be nothing left.
    2
  5. They're concerned about a rearmament after they took over Crimea? Even if Crimea is rightfully Russian, you'd expect a country to notice its vulnerability and spin up a military force.
    2
  6. Iran also shot down an airliner, and so did pro-Russia rebels over Ukraine with a Buk missile system. Literally nobody is innocent in this case, and Russia helped sweep it under the rug by moving the SAM back to the homeland after they realized what the rebels did.
    2
  7. Why doesn't Russia give in to NATO demands instead of risking war? Why doesn't NATO give in to Russia?
    2
  8. How do we know who put them there? And when? And is there confirmation it's actually mined or just one or two for the tale?
    1
  9. They attempted to seize an airport near Kiev to deploy troops into the capital right in the first night but the Ukrainians hit it during the fighting which means they had to do the trip by land. Had they secured that landing strip, they'd have taken Kiev in the first day.
    1
  10.  @Ziegfried82  If the concessions are being reported accurately, Putin is already showing that he's backing off on his demands.
    1
  11. Give me a source, I found 13k dead from both sides.
    1
  12. That happened before he was elected.
    1
  13. The MiGs themselves are in a state of disrepair. No good sending those death traps.
    1
  14.  @robertrussell5856  I'm on mobile so it's difficult to confirm source but I think I read yesterday they were put on hold from flying in 2017. Also, do the Ukrainians still control usable airfields or are they going to operate them off highways?
    1
  15.  @robertrussell5856  The results if I google MiG-24 are of Su-24s. MiG is short for Mikoyan-Gurevich and Su is short for Sukhoi, they're manufacturer's names and not just designations.
    1
  16.  @robertrussell5856  That's not how it works. The search engine guessed I had made a mistake and presented me the correct results. Without a search engine I'd be stuck on a wild goose chase looking for a MiG-24 that doesn't exist. Your excuse is centered around the fact that modern tech can sometimes compensate for human error.
    1
  17.  @georgeian3243  They get a bad rap these days but they sure warned us of every possible pitfall.
    1
  18. The RPGs are not as effective as the NLAW.
    1
  19. By that logic, you should keep going anyway. If it's already lost, gut the enemy. It might not save you, but will save countless in the future by making it known that the small guy will cripple the big guy. And plays like these will kill empires.
    1
  20.  @samething9376  Okay. Should we go tell Putin his actions also affect others? The Russian claim that 95% of their forces are combat effective kinda leads credence to the estimate of 10k dead and injured. Far less optimistic than Ukraine's bolt claim, but pretty severe. That's not miniscule. The equipment damaged is also a huge factor, and even if they sent older stock the losses are not recoverable in this economy.
    1
  21.  @samething9376  I didn't say you said that. I simply asked you to apply the same logic. You're concern trolling about casualties, because you see the defender as having the moral responsibility to limit them, even though it's the aggressor who's firing the shells. There would have been ZERO war casualties had Putin not called for the invasion. It is a lot. Please think. The Russian Federation is losing a lot of valuable equipment and men. Even though these losses may seem sustainable, this "special military operation" is costing them men at rates seen in total wars. The munitions and fuel being spent are also depleting their stock. 10k dead and wounded in two weeks means 100k dead and wounded in two weeks versus a more capable adversary. The no-fly zone wouldn't do anything. There's essentially no middle-road here. The damage has been done. The only options are either instant capitulation or fight until defeat. The half-measure of giving up now will not bring back the dead. It will not rebuild Ukraine. Many of course want to return, but there will be nothing but exposed concrete and rubble waiting for them. You think surrender will make things get better, but they won't for several years. The homes, the roads, the bridges, the jobs won't be there. People will be refugees in their own country. And you're asking of them to just accept that. Roll over. The fact that the outcome is the same only reinforces the point - if the country is a wreck either way, might as well ask Russia to pay with the blood of their young men and the aluminum and steel of their war machines. The outcome will be the same for Ukraine. But it won't be the same for Russia. You're asking for Russia to get away scot free.
    1
  22.  @samething9376  Oh yes, the usual "no solution" cope. Bad bosses love it, the workers can't call out bad decisions that everyone knows are bad, because they're not aware of better alternatives. Let's just drive off a cliff because nobody knows which way the destination is! Want to limit casualties? Russia stops attacking. Simple as. Surrender? Who said surrender? It's you who's denying the solution now! The murderer gets away scot free! The solution is easy, and you're actively supporting more strikes! The mask comes off, you have been concern trolling about casualties all along, like I predicted. The negotiations failed because Russia is demanding Ukraine to stop being a country. They turned it into rubble, and want to make sure it can't resist invasion again. The robber steals from your house. Then demands you can't change the lock or install an alarm. Yes, it's the home owner's fault this deal can't be made. It's out of the question to have peace? Oh, so Ukraine gets beaten into a bloody pulp, but can't even leave this fight humiliated and shake hands. It needs to submit even further. Out of the question, you say. Defeat isn't enough for you. I mean, Putin... You're clearly making excuses for the aggressor and pretending you want him to stop, while actively saying it's impossible to stop. It's not impossible, that's what China did after they invaded Vietnam in 1979. Their losses were unsustainable so they declared victory, said they had caused enough punitive damage and left. That's not fanfic. That's not universal world peace. It's the real world.
    1
  23.  @samething9376  And you are waaaaay to emotionally attached to Putin's idea of might makes right. I gave plenty of retorts. I didn't say they "should" stop, I said they have the ability to stop this at any time. You blame the victim and refuse to blame the aggressor. "Well Ukraine should just stop existing" genius why didn't anyone think of that? Come on Ukrainians, just be Russia. You're saying Putin won't stop if you ask nicely, but then claim Ukraine's only option is to... ask Putin to stop. You defeated your own argument. You're admitting that surrender will not erase Ukraine's troubles. He will not stop by asking nicely. You're the one promoting the kumbaya fantasy that Russia will simply stop having an interest in a subjugated Ukraine. I'm promoting the harsh reality that Ukraine will only achieve satisfactory conditions by forcing Russia to pay in blood. This is not kumbaya. This is speaking the only language that you "might makes right" fools understand. The more power you give to force, the more you practically beg for force to be used against you. You asked for these rules. Now we will play by them. You think the victim should stop by asking nicely. Instead the victim focuses of making you bleed. Bad guys are bad. Which mean good guys should make them pay. In blood. Or else they won't stop. Bad guys won't stop being bad. They stop. When their heart stops. You are ignorant of what "concern trolling" is. I didn't call you a "troll". You don't understand what terms mean, that's fine, we're not born with all the knowledge. But learn. You have no complaint here. Your fanfic is that bad people will stop when asked nicely. You make the case that Russia won't stop, then say the solution is asking them for a timeout. All I'm saying is if Russia won't stop, Russia must bleed until it learns the lesson. You say might makes right and everyone else should cower, but you cower at the use of might and say that instead Russia should just be allowed to march into Kiev for a victory parade. You're the one writing the fanfic where the bad guy stops, even though your entire argument is based on bad people not being bad.
    1