Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Good Luck Finding out the Truth on Ukrainian Biolabs" video.

Yeah. These facilities already have occasional leaks, last thing we need is an 18 year old private trashing the place.
2
@command_unit7792 lmao trash the houses, create thousands of refugees, eliminate the jobs making it hard to come back, then pretend you didn't do anything because you didn't touch the flag. Things like these make me more understanding of thought-crime, because anyone who uses that excuse for real actually deserves medieval forms of punishment.
2
@jussim.konttinen4981 I understand that's the country total, I'm just saying "thousands" to estimate the count from a few days from a single city.
2
@iantaylor9455 This is nonsense. You have no way of predict the chaos of a hit. Just a meter of drift would cause the building to suffer differently. The hot fireball lasts a fraction of a second. Thermal conductivity to destroy pathogens inside what's probably cryogenic storage would be insufficient. Manually removing the storage vials and placing them inside a commonly available pressure cooker for 15 minutes would be better than 10,000 degrees C for a tenth of a second. Stop using children's logic.
1
@iantaylor9455 Imagine being this passive agressive over being called out for thinking real life is even more cartoonish than Mission Impossible 2. Lmao
1
@iantaylor9455 I'm "throwing shit" for explaining that tossing bombs at facilities does not sterilize them? It's not an insult. Thinking that bombs cause fire and fire sterilizes is literal children's logic. If you feel insulted, that's on you.
1
@iantaylor9455 Perhaps because nobody would go over there, so nobody gets infected even if it leaks.
1
@markscouler2534 Something doesn't need to be weaponized to be nasty. Inagine that - all the diseases we want to find cures for and keep secured inside facilities are things you don't want to get.
1
@Zuluknob If the coof was a bioweapon, it was terrible. I had it twice and survived.
1
@Zuluknob I'm sure the numbers weren't fudged. Impressive how the government can't be trusted, but you will use their numbers when it benefits you. Also, you're already walking back your initial argument. That's all I needed.
1
@Zuluknob Oh, so it's back to being a weapon. Changing the argument again... If the effectiveness of a weapon was entirely based on governmental-self sabotage, it's not a weapon. It's just a feint. The economic damage hit all sides, meaning the effectiveness can't even be relied on. Even taking this argument at face value, it's a terrible weapon and not worth the effort put into it, considering there's just natural diseases that could have done the same.
1
@Zuluknob I can't because youtube is deleting your comments. But you said that it was not ready, it was a leak of a disease that wasn't final.
1
Exactly. Anyone who's been playing this game for a while has seen the moves. First it was internet claims that the biolabs were struck by the first cruise missiles (which would cause leaks and erase evidence), then American deboonkers started tracking mentions of biolabs on alt media. Russia and China decided to press on the claims after DC already knew this would be the next card being played.
1
If it was something we didn't care was let loose, would it be worth studying?
1