General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Titanium Rain
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
comments
Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "BLM Leader Shot by Gang" video.
@mrmagoo-i2l Why would an intelligence agency want her dead? The powers that be want us divided.
5
If she dies you'll have to keep seeing her on tshirts and murals.
3
@philcollins2546 for the past year people have been paying over a dollar a round no matter the caliber, so not a big deal
2
@Sajuek That's not how you do things. You don't compare a cancer free control group subject to a cancer patient to see if a drug works. You compare the same patient before and after.
1
@ts757arse the "revolver" has to be a rifle with a barrel length minimum and a grip extension.
1
@AeneasGemini No, the data doesn't support it. You just claim it does because it's expedient. Gun crime rose after the bans.
1
@Sajuek number of metropolitan cities per capita in the US is huge.
1
@Sajuek because you already live in one?
1
@FatalPies the M14 is a pretty crappy weapon, but Abrams and Apaches didn't solve Afghanistan.
1
@FeatherSword446 still saved his ass pulling the blaster on Grievous.
1
@SP-lw7mr Learn from what? Automatics were banned by the Hughes Amendment in the 80s in the US.
1
@FatalPies It's the graveyard of empires for a reason. You can't govern those who refuse to be governed. And we could learn from them in that aspect.
1
@ts757arse I watch English Shooting sometimes so I know what goes on. The issue is that those require a FAC so most people have an easier time getting a shotgun certificate.
1
@ts757arse "Regardless, the system is there to stop people with the attitude of "I just want a gun"" - Which are exactly the people I trust. Not the weirdos so obsessed they subject themselves to the ritual. "I didn't find the speed a problem as I wanted to learn how to use different weapons and so on" - This is the definition of cope. "so if you go "I want a gun, any gun" well you may be happy with a shotgun" - Not sure what's the point of this.
1
@elias_xp95 Nobody has a right to shoot any children. What you're describing is a crime.
1
@ts757arse Oh, you want people to be trained? But that makes them more dangerous. Oh and the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology did their own study and admitted that mental health vetting doesn't work. Mental illness doesn't correlate with violence and the people who are dangerous would simply lie to pass the vetting. Plus there wouldn't be enough psychologists and money to afford putting all licensees through the process. I'm not the weirdo. I'm chill. You're the one defending your own government treating you like a criminal. Personal attacks? I'm not attacking anyone. I only said I watch a youtuber so you'd quit talking about the types of guns allowed. Clearly I should have just allowed to keep you ranting about how much freedom you have.
1
@ts757arse Suicide rates are pretty consistent across a lot of the big western countries. Like I said I read the POST's own report on it and they admitted it wouldn't work so it was never introduced into the process. I'm not judging from the armchair, I simply looked up the facts and turns out the UK's own government laid it out pretty well. The vast majority of people don't know anything. What does it matter if they're quite happy? I mean, why are you on this channel anyway? If things are fine the way they are, why is there a podcast dedicated to complaining about the state of the UK? How is it obvious in the stats? If you plot gun ownership and gun homicide by country there's no correlation. I don't agree with the way America does it either, so you're just strawmanning. America is wrong too. No, it's not different, it's just wrong. The whole point behind Britain's gun control was 1920s fears about WWII veterans staging a coup that mirrored the Russian revolution. It's just a sign your government hates you and wants you weak. I don't care about the uproar or legalizing anything. I'm just exposing your rationalizations. If it was about target shooting you wouldn't need a gun, you can shoot targets through other means. It's about the gun, but you can't admit it to yourself. I didn't say I wanted you to shut up about UK laws, I wanted you to get off my case about what kinds of weapons you want to brag about. You people always assume you're talking to people who think guns are banned and love going on and on about all the guns you can have. I always find it amusing when people mention .50 BMG as if the number of people with those rifles isn't miniscule and the number of ranges that authorize that kind of shooting is high enough to matter. I'm not American. If you were done with nonsense you wouldn't get a loicense lmao.
1
@elias_xp95 Except it doesn't, because regulation and gun violence doesn't correlate. That's the facts. Your love for gun control? Feelings.
1
@elias_xp95 It's not cherry picking. Australian gun crime was already on the downward trend since the late 60s. Japan never had much gun crime. Most of Europe passed gun control as a way to collect taxes or a response to situations like danger of revolution because the gun crime was never a big of a deal. This is like giving a drug to someone whose cancer is already in remission and claiming your drug cures cancer. No, I'm not American. The problem with your argument is that by that logic, crime should be higher outside of Chicago. The fact that it isn't proves it's not the guns, it's the society. Society outside of Chicago is peaceful and has no problems with guns despite having open access to them. But most regulation does stop law abiding citizens. It's a cultural engineering tool that discourages most law abiding citizens from even attempting to go through the process, and make those who do look like weirdos in the eyes of society. Not to mention that most countries with regulation do have some kind of ban in place, so your argument makes no sense. Like in some countries people have .38 Super or 9x21mm handguns because they can't own 9x19mm. By your own logic the restrictions would make sure no bans are needed, but they put nonsensical bans in place anyway. You ask for one you need to take the combo deal. You don't get to demand only rational regulations. In the US gun crime is punished, I don't even know what you mean with that line of reasoning that gun control is necessary to punish criminals.
1
@mrmagoo-i2l Seems like my comment didn't go through. My reply is that it simply makes no sense. Noisy is good. There's no such thing as too noisy. Unknown variable? These people are all predictable, they're trained by their ideology.
1
@MacTastic360 Yes, and they didn't need false flags to cover it up, they just did it and had enough allegiance from their own power structure to do it in the open and get support for their actions.
1