Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "BLM Leader Shot by Gang" video.

  1. 5
  2. 3
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17.  @ts757arse  Suicide rates are pretty consistent across a lot of the big western countries. Like I said I read the POST's own report on it and they admitted it wouldn't work so it was never introduced into the process. I'm not judging from the armchair, I simply looked up the facts and turns out the UK's own government laid it out pretty well. The vast majority of people don't know anything. What does it matter if they're quite happy? I mean, why are you on this channel anyway? If things are fine the way they are, why is there a podcast dedicated to complaining about the state of the UK? How is it obvious in the stats? If you plot gun ownership and gun homicide by country there's no correlation. I don't agree with the way America does it either, so you're just strawmanning. America is wrong too. No, it's not different, it's just wrong. The whole point behind Britain's gun control was 1920s fears about WWII veterans staging a coup that mirrored the Russian revolution. It's just a sign your government hates you and wants you weak. I don't care about the uproar or legalizing anything. I'm just exposing your rationalizations. If it was about target shooting you wouldn't need a gun, you can shoot targets through other means. It's about the gun, but you can't admit it to yourself. I didn't say I wanted you to shut up about UK laws, I wanted you to get off my case about what kinds of weapons you want to brag about. You people always assume you're talking to people who think guns are banned and love going on and on about all the guns you can have. I always find it amusing when people mention .50 BMG as if the number of people with those rifles isn't miniscule and the number of ranges that authorize that kind of shooting is high enough to matter. I'm not American. If you were done with nonsense you wouldn't get a loicense lmao.
    1
  18. 1
  19.  @elias_xp95  It's not cherry picking. Australian gun crime was already on the downward trend since the late 60s. Japan never had much gun crime. Most of Europe passed gun control as a way to collect taxes or a response to situations like danger of revolution because the gun crime was never a big of a deal. This is like giving a drug to someone whose cancer is already in remission and claiming your drug cures cancer. No, I'm not American. The problem with your argument is that by that logic, crime should be higher outside of Chicago. The fact that it isn't proves it's not the guns, it's the society. Society outside of Chicago is peaceful and has no problems with guns despite having open access to them. But most regulation does stop law abiding citizens. It's a cultural engineering tool that discourages most law abiding citizens from even attempting to go through the process, and make those who do look like weirdos in the eyes of society. Not to mention that most countries with regulation do have some kind of ban in place, so your argument makes no sense. Like in some countries people have .38 Super or 9x21mm handguns because they can't own 9x19mm. By your own logic the restrictions would make sure no bans are needed, but they put nonsensical bans in place anyway. You ask for one you need to take the combo deal. You don't get to demand only rational regulations. In the US gun crime is punished, I don't even know what you mean with that line of reasoning that gun control is necessary to punish criminals.
    1
  20. 1
  21. 1