Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "I Hate the US Gun ‘Debate’" video.

@_Sakidora_ Fine. Then speech is limited by the decibels in one's voice and the speed of the presses available at the time. Fourth Amendment doesn't apply to computers, cellphones or the internet either.
13
No, that was the Miami FBI shootout in 1986. It wasn't just a phase, 9mm bullets sucked. Or better, all bullets sucked but the sheer mass of 45 and 40 allowed them to do the job.
6
@kylekillgannon responding to an active shooting isn't vigilantism
4
@kylekillgannon In many countries if you see an accident on the highway you are required by law to insert yourself in the situation and provide help despite no qualifications.
2
@gipgap4 so let's just let culture get worse and people still die from other weapons?
1
Not really. Pistols were often in very weak calibers like .25 and .32, while 9mm Luger was a service round. Even the Browning Hi Power has that name because it was a response to a French military request for a high power pistol. It was by the 1980s that it started to be considered weak because American police officers were used to .357 Mag revolvers. In terms of WWI tech, it was a powerful pistol round. Not today with the advances in metallurgy and locking breech designs.
1
The thing is that most of the current shooters follow the pseudo-commando archetype. They're "warriors" using their strength on innocent victims as a form of "revenge" against society. The massacre being interrupted is a huge blow to the ego because they cannot accept defeat, hence the high chance if them turning the gun on themselves and ending it as soon as they meet resistance. The thought process was correct, the script wasn't. He should have leaned on how embarassing it's going to be, not how deadly.
1