Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Biden Bombs the Germans" video.

  1.  @housewilma4904  Yes. You saw that Sy Hersh claimed that Jans Stoltenberg was a CIA asset since he was 16 years old. Deny it. You saw Sy Hersh claim that Norway used a P-8 aircraft they couldn't have used. Deny it.
    4
  2. Real journalists make up anonymous sources? Explains why journalism is so discredited.
    3
  3. Well, you didn't make it up. Someone else did. You're not seeing current events, you're parroting schizo-tier conspiracies from Substack.
    2
  4. What job? Making up a source in his mind and writing fanfiction about it?
    2
  5.  @Si_Mondo  Forget track record. He said Jans Stoltenberg was in Vietnam (16 years old at the time) and that Norway had a P-8 aircraft (will be delivered late 2023). It's all a lie and a track record can't rescue this drivel.
    2
  6. That's why he made up sources in his mind? lmao
    2
  7.  @alaskamark4562  Russia said they'd repair the pipes in exchange for sanctions relief.
    2
  8.  @jukka-pekkaparjanen7590  The radar evidence doesn't show anything. An American P-8 flew near where Sy claimed the Norwegian P-8 flew. But this can just be reversing from the evidence that exists to come up with a narrative. There's no proof that a buoy was dropped. But there was an airplane nearby - so claim the airplane was there to drop the buoy. Even though a civilian naval vessel could have been used for the purpose. The boat tracking data also would require divers to swim for several hours to get close to the explosion sites.
    2
  9.  @mihaiszilagyi9987  Putin. The US benefited nothing - NS1 was blocked by Russia, NS2 blocked by Germany. No reason to blow anything up. Meanwhile oligarchs had a reason to take out Putin and declare peace to keep profiting from gas. Blow up the pipelines, now the oligarchs must bow to Putin as they have nothing else but their leader.
    1
  10.  @mihaiszilagyi9987  Germany blocked NS2 by refusing to certify it. They did it on their own will, because they wanted Russia to give up on the war in exchange for opening NS2.
    1
  11.  @mihaiszilagyi9987  That's not how it works.
    1
  12.  @mihaiszilagyi9987  Ukraine in 2014? You mean when the US tried to keep Yanukovych in power but Ukrainians rejected the deal?
    1
  13. Which is why Barnes keeps proving himself to have double digit IQ.
    1
  14. Georgia isn't in the EU.
    1
  15. There's not enough LNG ships to handle that surplus. China also needs energy.
    1
  16.  @ICaImI  "Bombing their own people" and yet casualty figures are minuscule. Most casualties were the result of unexploded ordnance and landmines laying around in the conflict area. Russia used Hamas-tier tactics by firing Grad rockets from civilian areas and letting the Ukrainian response fall on the precious Russian speakers they were supposedly saving. Did you read about the 2015 Mariupol rocket attack? Russia fired Grads from within Russian territory into an Ukrainian city. The Russians were the ones bombing their "own" people.
    1
  17.  @ICaImI  Did you see the quotes? Russians claim they are their own people. They're Ukrainians and Russia doesn't care about them. They'll say they're Russians, but fire rockets at them. There's a reason why Azov was stationed in Mariupol, they became known as the defenders of the city when Russia invaded. The quotation marks are usually added to convey irony. Is this the first comment you've read online?
    1
  18.  @VladK-1  He's getting ride alongs with the Russian army, how is he independent? Also, Lancaster is a war criminal who desecrates bodies to stage scenes for his videos. He is untrustworthy. Look at his video of the roadside attack on a civilian car. The body shown had a straight cut on the skull. That body had been stolen from a coroner or mortuary after autopsy. The skull was sawed open to get to the brain.
    1
  19. Not really. Putin benefits the most. Oligarchs could take him out and declare peace in exchange for the juicy gas profits. With the pipeline gone, oligarchs have no option but to support Putin to get them out of the hole.
    1
  20. This, but the other way around. Seymour is the senile boomer trying to relive the "America bad" era from Cold War politics.
    1
  21. He's intelligent? Then how come he's leading his country to absolute ruin? He could have waited for EU/NATO infighting to make things worse for the west, instead he invaded and caused the west to unite under a single cause.
    1
  22.  @rjaymurphy  Didn't a Der Spiegel Pulitzer prize winner admit he faked his story? And didn't Lance Armstrong use PEDs? Great people have fallen. Why didn't you mention how Seymour Butts here disgraced himself by siding with Russia in the Syrian gas attacks and the Skripal affair?
    1
  23. The USA didn't do it. A guy with a made up anonymous source said the USA did.
    1
  24. How is it a self-own? Russia is being taken out for the price of peanuts, and China is realizing how bad a hypothetical war would go down for them.
    1
  25. Why would a hostage taker start executing hostages?
    1