Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Why don't tanks use commercial TVs for navigation?" video.

  1. The tank sights are already monitors, though. Gunner and commander have their own.
    1
  2. Okay. You're gonna do 2000 Abrams? Are weekends good for you? The problem is that you think about outfitting one tank, and don't realize you have to extrapolate this solution.
    1
  3.  @andreiiasi  But those millions were spent what? In the 1960s and 1970s? I need tanks, I need them now, we're gonna do what we can and hatches open it is. I'm not going to wait on a McGyvered solution people on youtube tell me is really easy.
    1
  4. One guy did one. Now try a 2000 unit sized fleet and just 1000 for foreign orders to start with.
    1
  5. And we also have overhead ISR drones and don't send out armored vehicles without support so we don't face the problem those screens are supposed to solve.
    1
  6. It's like weathering the cold because the rest of your classmates said your jacket looked "gay". We mocked them so hard they stopped using them.
    1
  7. Cameras are cheap now. Most armor design dates back to the cold war.
    1
  8. They're not using the drones to chase a problem, they're using them to solve problems. That's the difference in attitudes, the ones who say "just do X" and the people who do.
    1
  9. The issue is now setting up a program to upgrade a thousand vehicles.
    1
  10. Now do that to a fleet of thousands of armored vehicles. Anyone can do a one-off of anything. It gets exponentially harder to mass produce.
    1