Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. It's essentially a Harrier but actually good.
    12
  2. You got it backwards. Nobody will ever buy a CAS bird. The Europeans aren't making one. The Russians aren't making one. The Chinese aren't. It's a dead end design, it's a dodo. The animal kingdom has moved on. If you depend on a platform that was outdated in the 1980s when Tunguskas were introduced, you're already doing something wrong and need to think how to get out of that dependency.
    9
  3. So basically make new A-10s. It's gonna cost more than a F-35 because of economies of scale. Replacing the gun would be neat, but you'd have to replace it with ballast. The airplane center if gravity can't be shifted back.
    1
  4.  @TheMuricanMerc  You're not going to "turn radius" your way out of a modern missile. Proportional guidance is a bish.
    1
  5.  @seanlarabee6300  Can't fly a Hog off a short deck carrier. You're getting Harrier or F-35B. You're not picking Harrier, that's for sure.
    1
  6.  @pogo1140  If the Marines are calling in F-35Bs, radars aren't an issue by that point. There's going to be helicopters delivering supplies and bringing back casualties.
    1