Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "New UFO \"Evidence\" vs. SCIENCE" video.

@mtb416 It's not punching down. Wait, what? So flat earthers have the freedom of speech to spew nonsense but we can't correct them? If that's punching down, I'd rather give them the ground and pound, UFC style.
5
 @UFOtalk98 the cameras are made to put a laser spot on a Soviet made tank and drop a 1000lb bomb in it to make it vanish. Not to be a magical identifying machine.
5
@johannesg8959 I've seen the "curvature" by standing seaside then on top of a cliff and verifying that I could see more of ship hulls or just seeing the ship after only seeing the sail over the horizon. There's also no workable model for a flat earth where the sun, moon and stars move like they do in real life. The globe earth model explains what we see.
4
 @mickd8188 Silently breaking the sound barrier... or the radar is malfunctioning...
4
@hhaste math isn't wrong, but math based on flawed principles isn't math. The field of statistics doesn't work when your hypothesis is based on factors we can't know about. You switched from statistics to guesswork.
2
 @mickd8188 "F-16 pilot math" you mean that guy who was already contradicted by crew chiefs?
2
 @hydra70 "heat signature" usually refers to internal temperature. Cold sea water can reflect sunlight, so IR cameras can see objects "illuminated" by heat from other objects.
2
 @kanej7572 the US military sees no benefit in releasing their conclusions. Mick West is doing a public-facing job while most of the military work is internal, not posted online for PR.
2
A jammer could be working in the area completely unrelated to the occurrence, and I've heard of the sea surface thing being caused by a feeding of a certain species creatong bubbles on the surface.
2
1. But he was able to share it, just not in public. Whistleblowing can be done behind closed doors. 2. Snowden had the balls to reveal spying on telecommunications. If someone did have real evidence of aliens and a coverup, but wouldn't just YOLO it and flee the country, no balls. Either stand for what you believe in or stop wasting our time.
1
If you move a camera while recording an object, that happens.
1
@randywl8925 It's common for pilots to look at static objects without a frame of reference and thinking they are being followed. Same thing happens if you're driving down the road, almost static objects in the sky look like they're following you.
1
@isaactippetts882 Look, Cmdr Fravor probably believed he saw something. But he already "ruined" his reputation and can't back down now. You can tell when Elizondo or whoever is bragging about the "UFO" having an aura of cold air on the FLIR footage. Fravor's poker face is probably of a man realizing what he's gotten himself into. On targeting pods, there's an option that can be turned on and off to create a contrast outline so that the pilot can better notice targets. So if you have a hot source, you'll have a "cold" outline so that the enemy tank or whatever pops out from the background and you can point your laser guided munitions at it. The UFO nutter Elizondo doesn't know that. So he thinks there's a cold aura around the object. There isn't. That's an option you can turn on and off. Favor either forgot how his targeting systems worked, or he realized what he had done. He was looking at the tailpipe of another jet in the distance. And now we can't just admit he was wrong. So when you say military people are talking about it, remember that military people are like you and me.
1
Heat. There's no stealth in space.
1
How is it frustrating? Those videos are complete nothingburger. Those videos weren't the only data. Okay. But the supposed "data" they can't show doesn't correlate to the videos. Confused people and iffy radar operation. It happens. All those three things reported DIFFERENT phenomenon.
1
@haloadic2424 The military doesn't like airplanes crashing into objects. Pilots are seeing objects. They investigate to prevent accidents and figure out what's wrong with pilots and their training. Example, commercial pilots reported mysterious sightings. It was Starlink. Many pilots were trained before Starlink was launched into space. So people panic. It was nothing. But we had to investigate, and now we will tell young pilot trainees that at night they'll see Starlink. And they won't freak out when they fly at night. There's declassified UAP investigations. It's usually un-tethered balloons or drones violating FAA guidelines.
1
@kanej7572 Mind that the government is made up of thousands of departments. Just because the govt people coming forward say it's not explained, doesn't mean there's no departments that have the solution but it's still classified. There's been a few UAP investigations declassified. It's really mundane stuff. But even when an unlicensed drone violates FAA guidelines and it gets reported as a UAP, the government doesn't automatically come out and say it. The conclusion is still classified by default.
1
@UFOtalk98 What faulty cameras?
1
@hydra70 Aight. Everything is heat. Even the water is heat. What's the angle here?
1
 @mycarrysun If it's such a big deal, an earth shattering revelation, you do it anyway. If running to a different country is too inconvenient, then it's not worth showing.
1
@robotx4242 If it's not worth ruining his life over, it's not really important.
1
It's sheer thrust. Soviet/Russian designs would be able to pull the same stunts but their engines would melt the turbine blades trying to deliver that much power.
1
@kmodo93 LERX or leading edge root extensions. In the post stall, certain surfaces create a vortex that sticks to the wing and allows some control authority even though you shouldn't have it.
1
So you're saying it is... "concrete evidence"?
1
 @dealwolfstriked272 and if I'm not mistaken the backseater did two interviews with Mick West and she doesn't seem as adamant about what she saw.
1
@dealwolfstriked272 Brand new radar was funky, Fravor saw something unrelated. Big whoop. The FLIR does not corroborate the radar phenomenon (sudden altitude drop) nor the sudden disappearance from visual. Three separate behaviors captured by three sets of instruments.
1
But he didn't have to lie. "Someone told me" = everything can be fabricated but he doesn't get in trouble because he isn't lying if someone was lying to him. Think for 30 seconds.
1