Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "8 News Now — Las Vegas" channel.

@Im_Majik "There are no optical illusions about it." - Yes, there are. For example the rotation of one of the objects is glare reflected off a spinning mirror. A depot level FLIR technician made a video about the reflective surfaces that redirect the image inside the pod. "And these UAPs are doing things that would kill a human instantaneously" - No, they aren't. The only evidence for this are radar returns showing a massive drop in altitude which was not sensed by any other instruments. And funnily enough these strange returns started when the radar was upgraded. "government has invested millions of dollars in training for these pilots" - They trained them to fire missiles at aircraft and drop bombs on tanks, not be all-knowing observers. The military is more interested in a pilot knowing the difference between a T-72 and a BTR-60 than identifying grey blobs.
1
@rrar rarr The issue is, have you seen the reports on IDENTIFIED flying objects? Because for every one of these events there are plenty of pilot reports of drones and balloons sighted during these flights. No, it's not more problem that there are aliens. Nothing about this says it's alien in nature.
1
@rrar rarr "Then there are cases where they aren't" - Probably the same things as in the solved cases, but there's not enough evidence. "Did you see the 60 minutes segment that recently came out on ufos?" - Yes, and it just rehashed a lot of things that have been explained. "This shit is definitely not a duck" - But the footage is consistent with that. "or malfunctioning equipment" - Except that there's two ships where the mysterious signals started after radar upgrades, and stopped after a while. Now that's convenient. The Pentagon will come out and say it's a balloon and you're not going to believe it.
1
@rrar rarr Then what's the point? You're not gonna get the moment of vindication.
1
@rrar rarr "i also dont believe the official story about how covid came about" - The media complained about anyone who didn't believe the narrative and social media deleted posts that questioned it. Why is the MSM talking about this and why aren't people's posts being deleted for talking about UFOs? "i hope you're just as sketptical about outrageous things like string theory, multiverse, simulation theory and all the other stuff being thrown at us by scientists" - The hell does this mean? I don't have my feed clogged with people having a mass hallucination about physics. In fact I was recommended a video about why simulation theory is wrong the other day. But here are people freaking out about blurry pictures and easily explained footage.
1
@rrar rarr "Maybe it's not being censored by the media because even they are in the dark about this stuff." - Just stop. Your argument is that the "real" narrative gets suppressed, then why are they not suppressing this one? Even if they were in the dark, they'd be told what to say. "Bob Lazar" - He has zero credibility. Sorry. He faked his credentials through his photo processing business and even got the name of the department wrong. His ID badge and pay stub sat Department of Naval Intelligence when they should say Office of Naval Intelligence. He got the element 115 from a piece about transuranic elements on Scientific American that came out 2 years before he mentioned it. "there's no such thing as mass hallucinations" - It's a figure of speech. You know what that is, right? "you're a nobody" - You're a nobody too, the hell is that supposed to mean?
1
@lads.7715 "That FLIR "optical illusion" just happened to be tracking an object on Underwood's radar. Coincidence?" - Huh, no? The optical illusion is the glare rotating due to the internal mirror rotating. Not the object itself. "Those "faulty upgraded radars" tracking "optical illusions"" - Hold on. The faulty signals were the ones detecting objects dropping from 80,000 feet to 50 feet. This was NEVER captured by any imaging pod. The optical illusion was the rotation caused by internal mirrors, not the object being tracked. An optical effect can't be tracked. Please learn to read. "directly guide Fravor and his Wingwoman directly to the Tic Tac" - Footage of which contradicts Fravor's testimony. "but someone with Fravor's experience" - Fravor exposed himself on Lex Friedman. He keeps banging on about his experience but he doesn't even understand how the systems work.
1
@lads.7715 Eyes fail you, especially with perspective tricks. If you start circling around a static object at high speed, without a good frame of reference you'll think you're dogfighting a ship. Fly too close to a balloon and your jet wash will burst it and cause it to disappear. Fravor did pull an Argument from Authority and tried to claim he understands his systems better than the people who analyzed the footage. His ego cannot let him admit the possibility that he is wrong. Of course the Pentagon looked into it. They're just not telling you. So you lose your mind and embarrass yourself.
1
@rrar rarr Funny, I ain't heard of you.
1
@lads.7715 "to imply that a Top Gun with 1000s of flight hours still can't tell if he's circling a static object or not" - And you're using pure appeal to authority. Skilled people make mistakes. Trained pilots have plunged aircraft into the ocean because they were disorientated. "experienced, trained eyewitnesses" - They're not "trained" for the abstract concept of UFO approach. They're trained to fire AMRAAMs, drop GBUs and land in carriers. Things that actually matter. Every year they have 400 days worth of training they need to cram into 250-260. They're not wasting time on your wild goose chase. You're ignoring all the experienced, trained pilots whose UFO/UAP reports were investigated and SOLVED. There are SOLVED cases that you people ignore. You keep banging on the "trained" line but funnily enough, an Air Force avionics systems technician who wished to remain anonymous did an interview with Mick West. He noticed West's video about unsharp mask, the thing that causes the white pixels around the black hot picture for contrast, he caught Fravor ""lying"". In an ops check you turn it on and off. Fravor nodded when the white pixels were described as cold air. Your boy is either poorly trained or lying and I don't know which is worse. He either knows what it is and refuses to correct it to push the UFO narrative, or he forgot which means he's not credible. He got caught in 4k.
1
@lads.7715 "would I still rather be in a Hornet piloted by the likes of Mick West than Fravor?" - This is a complete non-argument because this isn't a discussion on who flies better. I would rather not be flown by either of them because at this point I can't trust Fravor. "House Speakers, Congressmen" - HAHAHAHAHA "for an impressive overview of the gimbal video and instrumentation" - I already watched that video. And I caught the uploader in a lie. He argues that friendly fire is not possible because of technology, ignoring that in modern air combat strict RoEs are enforced to prevent friendly fire.
1