Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "RE: Bren vs Spandau - which was better? @Lindybeige" video.

@laurancerobinson "Experts are not infallible" - but somehow the average Army trained bloke living in a country where he can't own any semi-auto centrefire for comparison is
13
@laurancerobinson the studies and tests that determined that HK had to come along and fix the damned thing?
10
@laurancerobinson this argument is useless if you're not willing to say which studies you're even referring to. I tried to find them on my own and came across the LANDSET Report, which the MoD apparently tried to claim was fake and then later admitted to be real. Classy.
8
+Jim Fortune "The American M-60 is a machine gun. It was not heavily influenced by the design of an assault rifle" You are cordially invited to look at the goddamn FG-42 bolt and realize that M60 design copied it, even the spring used to assist semi-auto primer ignition, which is useless in the M60 but they copied it anyway.
7
+BorkaBonum because it encompasses two different guns, which leads to confusion, and was already the nickname for a WWI machine gun. Everyone knows what a Grease Gun is. If you say "Spandau" I'll actually assume you're talking about 80's music.
5
+Titytit Mk2 I somehow highly doubt that any gun on full auto could put two bullets on the same hole unless by 1 in a billion chance or the target is an inch from the muzzle. Not even an ultra-controllable Ultimax 100 firing 5.56, let alone a .303.
5
+Jan Schlossar how many AR-15 rifles have you fired?
1