Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. Fravor has never corrected the UFO nutters on the contrast border around objects, which can be turned off in the MFDs. He allows them to claim there's cold air around the "craft" when no, that's a contrast line drawn around a hot object to help pilots see.
    3
  2. At least two of the videos showing this amazing performance are actually pretty mundane. All we have is a supposed radar track no other sensor could corroborate.
    3
  3. Because witnesses are notoriously unreliable? So many UAP cases have been solved by people in their bedrooms. How many people would swear on their mother's grave they saw something unexplainable, then someone looks up flightradar and shows that an airliner was at the exact spot the UAP was?
    3
  4. The stories are similar because people's brains "fill in the blanks" with stories they have heard. Much like folk tales of monsters becoming warewolves or vampires. Why did people see warewolves? Because they heard of warewolves in stories.
    2
  5. No. It's birds. People have reverse engineered the footage into a 3d space with the aircraft moving and circling. The object seen was travelling at low speed and close to the water.
    2
  6. Pilots sometimes fly their aircraft into the ocean because they got disoriented. And Gaetz paid for a 17 year old to travel across state lines didn't he?
    2
  7. No. The FLIR video is pretty mundane.
    2
  8. ​ @blahblah49000  But they're not testifying the same thing. Fravor claims there was a dogfight. Videos show birds and objects being lost from track making them appear to accelerate.
    2
  9. The ones showing birds? lol
    2
  10. What happens when those three guys have nothingburger to serve and we're back to square one?
    2
  11. They saw the F-117 Nighthawk. It was only revealed later.
    2
  12. Combat veterans are a very diverse bunch. Some went to college, some became murderers and drug dealers. Taking part in combat is not a character defining trait.
    2
  13. Logical fallacies aren't illogical. That's why they're fallacies, they obey logical structure at a surface level. - Planets aren't made of cheese. - I am not made of cheese. - Therefore I am a planet. The conclusion actually follows the premises, but I am comitting a fallacy.
    1
  14. ​ @tbe0116  The radar data wasn't released and the FLIR videos don't match the claims.
    1
  15.  @blahblah49000  There's no evidence of radar track that matches the FLIR footage. If you're going to have corroborating evidence mentioned, you have to present it. We have heard of a radar track showing an instantaneous drop from 70-80 thousand feet to sea level. But that wasn't captured on FLIR. We can't put those things together.
    1
  16. What?
    1
  17. A lot of Americans have Germanic/Nordic heritage.
    1
  18. VW has experts in automobile engineering. So if they say they didn't cheat in emissions tests, they didn't. Of course, we know they cheated in the emission tests. Experts can lie. That's why you have to use evidence.
    1
  19. Sensors are fallible and able to be spoofed. Most sensors can't even detect origin of something.
    1
  20. UAP just means unidentified. If a bird flies in front of you, just you just see a black blurry shape speeding past, that's UAP.
    1
  21. It isn't. Your eyes can't measure accelaration without a frame of reference.
    1