Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. ​ @Bushodai  If the truck is an enemy asset and you plugged in the coordinates for a strike mission, that's combat. Like if you're driving a fuel truck as part of a logistics unit in the armed forces and the enemy takes it out, you think your family shouldn't get the benefits for you getting KIA?
    2
  2. Any satellite picture shows it.
    2
  3. Russia confirmed it.
    2
  4. ​ @lastknownjedi5119  A Su-34 just crashed per Ru MoD report. Crew didn't make it.
    2
  5. The F-117 did not have fighter capabilities. Engineers were adamant that trying to fire a missile off the bomb bay would scorch the RAM paint and ruin the stealth.
    2
  6. ​ @verdebusterAP  Iraq had a network centric air defense. It was called Kari and it was French built. Because "Kari" is "Irak" backwards, and the French often spell "Irak" with a K. The thing is that while Russia tried Shock & Awe the US deliberately targeted long range warning radars and HQs with Tomahawks while Apaches flew nap of the Earth and struck smaller radar stations close to the border. The F-117 had its chances of success maximized by a proper plan instead of just firing missiles at targets via Google Maps and 1980s Soviet maps. The firepower Russia brought out Feb 2022 was massive. It was an implementation problem.
    2
  7. ​ @anngo4140  It's not even that. 35M is most likely labor cost plus materials. When the Russian MoD buys, they're paying for R&D, the development of all the facilities, and the wages of the workers even when they're not tasked with construction.
    2
  8. Cope. Already confirmed by Russians on telegram.
    2
  9. ​ @shadmansudipto7287  Let's see you try to build a F-35 helmet that complies with govt/DoD standards for 10,000 lol
    2
  10. ​ @Hon2fun  The mark up us because of stuff like finding a Chinese magnet in the product requires a change in supplier. When DoD requires a laundry list of tests, background checks, audits, regulations, standards compliance, etc everything costs 16x. By all means try to make a targeting pod with an aliexpress camera. It would make for a guaranteed 1 million views video on youtube. But no government in a developed country would buy it.
    2
  11. The decoys are painted on the ground rather than built into 3d structures.
    2
  12. How is that an escalation? Has Russia not bombed Ukrainian airfields?
    1
  13. Every American getting 50 billion? Or every American getting 50,000/330 = 151,51 dollars? You want 150 bucks? Do a double shift at McDonald's lol
    1
  14. ​ @paulbarclay4114  Iraq was not stable. Saddam had to murd3r from 110,000 to 190,000 people to maintain his regime. Basically in a decade Saddam alone caused almost as much fatalities as the war and insurgency did the decade after 2003. A regime which needs bloodbaths to prevent rebellion is not stable.
    1
  15. ​ @paulbarclay4114  Syria was destroyed because when people started demanding freedom and protesting in the streets, Bashar Al-Assad released extremists from prison to false flag the protesters as terrorists. Al-Assad doesn't care that he rules over rubble as long as he's the ruler. The men he released later became ISIS.
    1
  16. ​ @paulbarclay4114  That's not accurate as that number was based on an interview study that could not be replicated. There's ZERO scientific backing for that number which media and propagandists repeat.
    1
  17. Fiberglass is good material. Since carbon fiber can block signal you need sections of aircraft built with fiberglass to put comms and radar antennas.
    1
  18. Hopefully it wouldn't show up on radar at all, because aiming radar at a road and not even using doppler filtering means the entire screen will be flooded by clutter.
    1
  19. >builds stealth aircraft >doesn't use it because it could be detected by radar Israel practically flaunted the F-35 by flying over Beirut and Iran.
    1
  20. ​ @korana6308  >truth an liberty >calls an aggressive war and oppression "SMO" lul you're for the same truth and liberty Stalin and Mao defended
    1
  21. Russians believe Ukrainians are too incompetent to fight back so anything they do is actually Americans/Brits.
    1
  22. ​ @FreedomForce100  How many targets has it engaged at 400km?
    1
  23. 1.6 losses per 100,000 flight hours btw. How many flight hours does the entire Su-57 fleet have?
    1
  24. The US had to use Patriot to defend their bases from Iraqi Scud attacks. Those are not sandals.
    1
  25. "Russians would never!" yeah this war had a lot of firsts, they're doing everything they'd never do.
    1
  26. Right but the Su-57 seems circumcised. Aircraft are fragile.
    1