Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "" video.

  1. There's only one radar station capable of tracking small space debris in Europe and its limit is 2 cm objects. Not microns. It's large and I assume the power consumption is enormous. If an anti-stealth radar is so large and powerful that a continent can only have one, and it can't be packed up in a few hours and moved away then it's going to be hit by a hail of cruise missiles the moment the conflict kicks off. Failing that, the power output makes it a juicy target for ARMs so it will have to be shut down anyway. And now the stealth aircraft has free roam. Stealth pure and simply has physics on its side.
    3
  2. Even in the early days it was known that there's a difference between SEAD and DEAD. If you want a SAM site to be truly knocked offline you'd need to use bombs and rockets on the equipment, and if necessary use the gun too.
    2
  3. That's great but losing radars is often worse than losing the launchers.
    1
  4. Modern HARM variants save the last known position.
    1
  5. The Soviets were using 80% of their GDP on defense while the US was spending 30%. No collapse.
    1
  6. A-10s would do any better than the Su-25s.
    1